What is the best way to categorize your commentaries? How do you know which one is more expositional, exegetical, homiletical, or devotional. I am not very familiar with my commentaries so it is not easy for me to categorize them.
How do you know which one is more expositional, exegetical, homiletical, or devotional.
perhaps this site: http://www.bestcommentaries.com/category/genesis/
It has them categorized using this legend
i would guess that Technical = Expositional, Exegetical; Pastoral = homiletical??; Devotional
You have two basic options: tags, or collections. I chose collections, and they're listed below. To tag, you'd sort your library by series, then put type:commentary in the filter, then create your collections from tags.
Ideally, you should really get to know your commentaries and come to your own conclusions. You'll need a feel for quality as much as categories.
(There's an updated version of these rules now available.)
i like a little of both of the above. (I like "special study" and technical and pastoral/expository, along with some of the other designations Mark has--one volume.
Mark do some of your commentaries overlap? I find certain series might be a little technical and a little expository. I might want them in both. Wonder what your experience was.
How do you know which one is more expositional, exegetical, homiletical, or devotional. perhaps this site: http://www.bestcommentaries.com/category/genesis/ It has them categorized using this legend i would guess that Technical = Expositional, Exegetical; Pastoral = homiletical??; Devotional
For some reason when I go to the new testament page nothing show's up http://www.bestcommentaries.com/category/new-testament-commentaries/
Maybe I am doing it wrong?
I prefer them not to overlap, so I try and make a decision one way or the other. Currently the only one I do let overlap series is the Expositor's Commentary, and that's due to to the mixed nature of that series, and the fact that I don't currently know the individual volumes well enough to place them exactly.
For some reason when I go to the new testament page nothing show's up http://www.bestcommentaries.com/category/new-testament-commentaries/ Maybe I am doing it wrong?
Think that you need to click on each NT book (one at a time), clicking on the tab NT Books doesn't go anywhere.
EDIT: i also was looking for Logos page on commentary set review, it used to be on the old product page, but i can't locate it now on the new site. It was similar to the site above in that it had markings relative to type of commentary, but was for whole sets. Perhaps someone else knows how to find it on the new Logos.com site.
I made a separate collection for language commentaries. It includes the Handbook series, The New International Greek Testament series, Word Pictures in the N.T., Word Studies in the N.T. and Wuest's Word Studies in the Greek N.T.
What would you consider beets commentaries
For some reason when I go to the new testament page nothing show's up http://www.bestcommentaries.com/category/new-testament-commentaries/ Maybe I am doing it wrong? Think that you need to click on each NT book (one at a time), clicking on the tab NT Books doesn't go anywhere. EDIT: i also was looking for Logos page on commentary set review, it used to be on the old product page, but i can't locate it now on the new site. It was similar to the site above in that it had markings relative to type of commentary, but was for whole sets. Perhaps someone else knows how to find it on the new Logos.com site.
Thanks, I figured I was doing something wrong.. I noticed NICNT was in the pastoral section. I am debating if I should tag it as exegetical or expositional.