NT221 Resource Problem

So I just got Nt221 and was looking through the resource list and notice it said I do not have Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. The problem is I do and upon further inspection its because its linked to the first edition and not the second. Is there anyway yal could fix that so that when I get to that resource its connects to my second edition and I can see the resource.

Find more posts tagged with

Mobile Education

Comments

Michael S.

That has been an issue for quite some time. Many teachers and resources reference the original edition. I dont know why- do they not like the updated one? Is something wrong with the update? Im not sure.

Landon Brake

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1102675#Comment_1102675

Yea that's interesting but I just know I'm not going to buy the firsts edition just so it gives me the resources.But then the other problem is that its auto connected to a specific spot in the book so even on my second edition It wont tell you where its being pulled from.

Kenneth Neighoff

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1102678#Comment_1102678

Faithlife has been adding links to the second edition. Often you can figure out to where you ought to read.

Miles Custis

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1102675#Comment_1102675

This new edition is different from a lot of other books that come out with new editions. It has many completely new articles written by completely different people, so it essentially is a different resource. We decided not to add links to the new edition in our courses that linked to the old one. Sometimes the specific section linked to in the first edition doesn't exist in the second edition Also, both editions are available for purchase (although I completely understand not wanting to purchase the first edition when you own the second). Once the second edition was available in Logos we started linking primarily to it in our courses.

Landon Brake

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1102697#Comment_1102697

Okay that makes a lot of sense especially for the type of dictionary it is. A little bit of a bummer but I understand. Thanks for replying back.