Why doesn't the detail show the 16:16 reference that is shown elsewhere? Showing 16:1 rather than 16:16 is not helpful.
This is because the label for that figure of speech covers the entire chapter, not just verse 16.
That doesn't make sense as the coding is supposedly that of Bullinger whose reference to chapter 16 in the article on Hypocatastasis referenced the chapter as a contrast not as an instance.
Matt. 15:26.—“It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Here, the Lord Jesus, did not say to the woman of Canaan, Thou art a dog of the Gentiles (which would have been Metaphor), but He left out all reference to her, and only referred to her by implication, substituting a “dog” for herself. The woman, unlike the disciples (in chap. 16), at once saw and understood what the Lord implied, viz., that it was not meet to take that which belonged to Israel and give it to a Gentile (or a dog of a Gentile as they were called by the Jews), “And she said, Truth, Lord.” What she felt is clear: “It is quite true; Thou art perfectly right; I called Thee ‘the Son of David,’ and deserved no answer; I pleaded for ‘help’ and said: ‘Lord, help me’; but I made no confession as to who the ‘me’ was: no acknowledgment of my unworthiness and unmeetness as ‘a dog of the Gentiles.’ ” “Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their master’s table. Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith.” So, it is “great faith” to understand what the Lord implied by the use of this beautiful figure, and it is “little faith” not to understand it! even though the former was spoken of a Gentile woman, and the latter of the apostles of the Lord. See also under Synecdoche and Meiosis.Ethelbert William Bullinger, Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (London; New York: Eyre & Spottiswoode; E. & J. B. Young & Co., 1898), 746.
Matt. 15:26.—“It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Here, the Lord Jesus, did not say to the woman of Canaan, Thou art a dog of the Gentiles (which would have been Metaphor), but He left out all reference to her, and only referred to her by implication, substituting a “dog” for herself. The woman, unlike the disciples (in chap. 16), at once saw and understood what the Lord implied, viz., that it was not meet to take that which belonged to Israel and give it to a Gentile (or a dog of a Gentile as they were called by the Jews), “And she said, Truth, Lord.” What she felt is clear: “It is quite true; Thou art perfectly right; I called Thee ‘the Son of David,’ and deserved no answer; I pleaded for ‘help’ and said: ‘Lord, help me’; but I made no confession as to who the ‘me’ was: no acknowledgment of my unworthiness and unmeetness as ‘a dog of the Gentiles.’ ” “Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their master’s table. Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith.” So, it is “great faith” to understand what the Lord implied by the use of this beautiful figure, and it is “little faith” not to understand it! even though the former was spoken of a Gentile woman, and the latter of the apostles of the Lord. See also under Synecdoche and Meiosis.
Ethelbert William Bullinger, Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (London; New York: Eyre & Spottiswoode; E. & J. B. Young & Co., 1898), 746.
Will you report it to the data team or should I create a new error report for them.
It appears there are two hypocatastasis labels labels present there. One covers the entire chapter of Mt 16, and the other covers Mt 16:12-16. Since we usually merge together overlapping references, I'm not surprised to see only the full chapter one displayed.
I have passed on the comment about the Mt 16 label, and I would expect that if that is removed, the other should show up as you expect.
If it isn't removed, I promise to throw a fit … not sure I can throw as far a Bellingham as I am in North Bend … but it is clearly a coding error.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
For a long time, I could have Logos indexing on my computer with no noticeable impact on performance of other apps. Recently - and I don't know when it started - but certainly for some months this is no longer the case. When Logos is indexing (or at least for some of the indexing process), it has a significant impact on…
I had to replace my PC which necessitated reinstalling Logos. The reinstall apparently updated something so that every time I open a book I now get a marketing side panel named "insights" which I cannot determine how to turn off. I want to permanently turn off the insights - how do I do it? Logos needs to stop adding this…
In Logos there was/is a feature that had the books of the bible linked to common passages in a circle of books linked back and forth as they where tied by common theme What is it and where can I find it I had it once but now I can't find it???????
I have thought about this but wanted to finally ask. I am looking to purchase a specific book or set of books and they are offered in a Logos 8, 9, 10, and 2026 libraries, is there any difference in the books themselves at this point, or will they all integrate with my current Logos 48 and work the same way? Also, is there…
Can some one help me with the syntax involved in writing a rule for library collections. I watched the video several times, and can mimic the example in the video, but when I try to develop another rule, nothing happens. I guess what I need to understand is exactly what elements are necessary to write the rule and where do…
