Passage List Sections

David Taylor, Jr. · 2024-12-19T05:04:50+00:00

There was an error rendering this rich post.

I would like to see the ability to have sections in passage lists.

Example:

We have a Systematic Theology Class. I want a passage list with all main topics but broken down within those topics (Theology Proper, Christology, Soteriology, etc) without creating individual lists.

Find more posts tagged with

Mobile App

Features

Desktop App

Status: Submitted

Comments

MJ. Smith

We already have this. On the right side of an entry is a three dot menu that allows one to add headings.

David Taylor, Jr.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1349895#Comment_1349895

You know, I've been using Logos for 20 years and I NEVER KNEW THIS! WOW! Thanks MJ

Quick Links

Product Feedback

Recent Ideas

Missing Author Datatype / Wiki Article
I really want to have Dantes "Divina Comedia" in the Italian original in Logos/Verbum, but no one voted for it. So I tried to make a PB, but as other users affirm, there are no Milestones for "Dante" or the "Divina Comedia" present. Today, I wanted to check on the Author Datatype list coming from the Logos Wiki: Which…
Bible Study Builder notebook
can we please get the notebook function so that our notes for the questions could be stored in a notebook.
Notes: More Robust Indenting
When typing in Word, or even in the Notes Feature on the Logos Desktop App, when you start an indented number list, and you go to the next line then tab out, it goes from 1. to an a. indented from the position of the 1. (I hope this makes sense). I would love it if there was a way to add this to the Mobile/iPadOS version…
Addition to iOS app
In the iOS app there is a “back button” that will take you to the previous passage that you were at. It would be nice to also have a “forward” button so that you could go back to where you were before you hit the back button.
Missing/dead links interim improvement
On a frequent basis there is a forum thread on the issue of links resulting in a debate on links to different editions of the work. I suggest the following to minimize this reoccurring debate. Exclude milestone references and bibliographic references. If the user owns the edition referred to in the link, links as usual. If…