Because of its reference to image, I prefer to use the Genesis 1 reference for the creation of mankind rather than Genesis 2. This is especially important to me in the current political environment as Genesis 1 has an androgynous Adam rather than a male Adam. However, Logos not only makes Genesis 2 the primary text, it does not even make Genesis 1 co-equal (the way I would code it) but rather ignores Genesis 1 as a defining passage despite it being the source of image and likeness. This type of bias in Logos is the reason that we absolutely need to be able to add notes to Factbook to document and override the Logos interpretive bias. Ideally, it would be possible to note "corrections/alternatives" on all Logos tagging. For example, I personally consider tags in the Old Testament for the Holy Spirit or Jesus Christ to be anachronistic - as I prefer the tagging to reflect the original audience rather than the Christian audience.
