4.6b B1: Ratings

Dave Hooton

Collections

Fixed bug which caused existing collections utilizing ratings to employ both personal and community ratings. Note:
To set up a Collection for personal ratings use ‘myrating:x’. Existing
collections using ratings have been migrating to use this tag.

I note that rating:x works the same as myrating:x - is this temporary?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

I note that rating:x works the same as myrating:x - is this temporary?

"rating:x" shows the merged user and community rating. If Community Ratings aren't downloaded, it will be the same as "myrating".

Jack Caviness

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441177#Comment_441177

If Community Ratings aren't downloaded, it will be the same as "myrating".

Good to know. Thanks, Bradley.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441177#Comment_441177

"rating:x" shows the merged user and community rating. If Community Ratings aren't downloaded, it will be the same as "myrating"

My Q was restricted to 4.6b Beta, though i.e. are community ratings downloaded to 4.6b?

Are community ratings downloaded to v5 if we elect not to show them?

JT (alabama24)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441177#Comment_441177

"rating:x" shows the merged user and community rating. If Community Ratings aren't downloaded, it will be the same as "myrating".

I hope I am misunderstanding you… As someone who actually LIKES the idea of community ratings, highlights, tags, etc… I would NOT want community ratings and my ratings merged. I can't see any benefit to having them merged.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441345#Comment_441345

As someone who has no personal interest in using them but sees value in them for others, I also think there should be a complete separation.

Jack Caviness

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441372#Comment_441372

As someone who has no personal interest in using them but sees value in them for others, I also think there should be a complete separation.

Agree completely with this statement [Y]

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/441372#Comment_441372

As someone who has no personal interest in using them but sees value in them for others, I also think there should be a complete separation.

I think MJ is right that they should be separated - presumably this means that we should have options for "rating" and "myrating" (and similar for tags) as columns in the library?