Are Vyrso resources proofread at all?
Comments
-
Lee said:
May I suggest to MVPs: a little more diffidence, a little less officiousness
I'm sorry if it came across that way. The question of fixing errors in Vyrso books has come up often in the forums, and Logos' position is clear: http://community.logos.com/forums/p/33752/253166.aspx#253166 and http://community.logos.com/forums/p/56892/408198.aspx#408198. My comments reflected that certainty (although I wish I'd linked to those posts earlier in the discussion).
Lee said:But when red-starred (or otherwise) users start to write with "we are such and such"
I'm not sure if that was directed at me or not, but the "we" in my phrase "We're saying that" meant "we, the people in this thread, are saying". It didn't mean "we MVPs are saying", and certainly not "me and Logos are saying". I'm sorry if that wasn't clear. We all speak independently of Logos, and independently of each other. You've been around long enough to know that if you put five MVPs in a room, we'd probably spend most of the time arguing about something or other (nicely, of course!) [:)].
Lee said:"this is such a petty complaint" tone of voice
For what it's worth, I don't think alabama should have said that your complaint was petty (and I don't agree with him). Apart from my first post, I've tried to make clear that I believe you have a legitimate complaint, my only disagreement was about your proposed solution (not because it's a silly suggestion, but because Logos have already made clear that Vyrso can't work like that).
Lee said:Oh well, what a storm in a teacup! A good week ahead to all you!
[:)]
This is my personal Faithlife account. On 1 March 2022, I started working for Faithlife, and have a new 'official' user account. Posts on this account shouldn't be taken as official Faithlife views!
0 -
Thank you, Mark.
My observations were about this thread as well as other threads I have participated in.
Best wishes.
0