Question for Logos employee - or a very clever user
Comments
-
Three different threads later (one offshoot in Beta, one Bug offshoot and this thread) and not one response from Logos!
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
fgh said:Mark Barnes said:
Whilst not all need to be added, it would be a benefit adding at least the first eight.
A few more, please:
- The CJB
- The Aramaic Bible
- The EOB
All of these have unique perspectives and may come up with unique xrefs that can't be found elsewhere in Logos Bibles. Plus The Aramaic Bible would have been much higher up if you had added all the volumes together.
And also the ones high up on MJ's list, of course.
Now that I've run my own search, I want to add:
- Bibel -82 10.117 hits + 2,994 more in the Apocrypha volume, making it one of the best cross reference Bibles Logos has -- in spite of the little fact that it doesn't even have cross references for the OT.
Bibel 2000, which does have cross references for the OT, would be even better -- except the Logos edition leaves out all the notes and cross references, and in spite of trying for over three years, I still haven't managed to get Logos to do anything about it, or even give me much of an answer.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
Dave Hooton said:
Three different threads later (one offshoot in Beta, one Bug offshoot and this thread) and not one response from Logos!
Bradley did reply earlier in this thread. But nothing since then on all the issues (bugs ?) and discrepancies that are being pointed out.
Donnie
0 -
We do have an active case for updating the sources for Cross References in PG. I've added a link to this thread to make sure we consider the resources you all have listed here. There's currently no ETA assigned to the case.
0 -
Dylan Rondeau said:
We do have an active case for updating the sources for Cross References in PG. I've added a link to this thread to make sure we consider the resources you all have listed here. There's currently no ETA assigned to the case.
This should be fixed in 5.2b Beta 3. [:)]
0 -
Dylan Rondeau said:
We do have an active case for updating the sources for Cross References in PG.
The following resources have had the "contains-cross-reference-footnotes" trait added: (sorry for the formatting)
- Alford's Greek Testament (Text and Notes)
- The Uncanonical and Apocryphal Scriptures
- The Ecclesiastical or Deutero-Canonical Books of the Old Testament Commonly Called the Apocrypha
- Nova Vulgata Bibliorum Sacrorum Edition
- AMPATBBL
- ARAMAICBBL01A
- ARAMAICBBL01B
- ARAMAICBBL02
- ARAMAICBBL04
- ARAMAICBBL05A
- ARAMAICBBL06
- ARAMAICBBL07
- ARAMAICBBL08
- ARAMAICBBL09
- ARAMAICBBL11
- ARAMAICBBL12
- ARAMAICBBL13
- ARAMAICBBL14
- ARAMAICBBL15
- ARAMAICBBL18
- ARAMAICBBL19
- AV1873
- CEB
- CEV
- CZECHSB
- DCAPOCCHURTON
- DCBENSIRAOESTERLEY
- DCECCLBALL
- DCECCLCOWLEYENG
- DCECCLCOWLEYHEB
- DCTOBITGASTER
- DCWISDOESTERLEY
- DCWISDSTEVENSON
- EC_BLFBIBPV2009
- EINHEIT
- EINHEIT2
- EMPHBBL
- EOBNT
- EXPBBLNT
- GNBNR2000
- GNT
- ID-BIMK
- ID-ITB
- KJV1900
- LBLA95
- LUTBIB1984
- MENGE
- MINPRODRIVER
- MINPROHORSLEY
- MINPROROWLEY
- MINPROWADE
- MS-TDYMALAYV
- NA28GBS
- NBV
- NBVTEST
- NCV
- NEWSFLLIFBBL
- NIV2011
- NOVAVULGATA
- RSV2CE
- SI-PIJINBBL
- SNTGMUBS4
- TH-THBS1973
- TNIV
- TONGANBBL
- TSV
- ZURCHERBBL200
0 -
Thank you very much.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
So all these bibles were recently updated to appear in Cross References section of Beta, or this new beta now supports these (because some bibles already have cross ref indexes)?Dylan Rondeau said:
The following resources have had the "contains-cross-reference-footnotes" trait added: (sorry for the formatting)Dylan Rondeau said:We do have an active case for updating the sources for Cross References in PG.
Alford's Greek Testament (Text and Notes)
The Uncanonical and Apocryphal Scriptures
The Ecclesiastical or Deutero-Canonical Books of the Old Testament Commonly Called the Apocrypha
Nova Vulgata Bibliorum Sacrorum Edition
AMPATBBL
ARAMAICBBL01A
ARAMAICBBL01B
ARAMAICBBL02
ARAMAICBBL04
ARAMAICBBL05A
ARAMAICBBL06
ARAMAICBBL07
ARAMAICBBL08
ARAMAICBBL09
ARAMAICBBL11
ARAMAICBBL12
ARAMAICBBL13
ARAMAICBBL14
ARAMAICBBL15
ARAMAICBBL18
ARAMAICBBL19
AV1873
CEB
CEV
CZECHSB
DCAPOCCHURTON
DCBENSIRAOESTERLEY
DCECCLBALL
DCECCLCOWLEYENG
DCECCLCOWLEYHEB
DCTOBITGASTER
DCWISDOESTERLEY
DCWISDSTEVENSON
EC_BLFBIBPV2009
EINHEIT
EINHEIT2
EMPHBBL
EOBNT
EXPBBLNT
GNBNR2000
GNT
ID-BIMK
ID-ITB
KJV1900
LBLA95
LUTBIB1984
MENGE
MINPRODRIVER
MINPROHORSLEY
MINPROROWLEY
MINPROWADE
MS-TDYMALAYV
NA28GBS
NBV
NBVTEST
NCV
NEWSFLLIFBBL
NIV2011
NOVAVULGATA
RSV2CE
SI-PIJINBBL
SNTGMUBS4
TH-THBS1973
TNIV
TONGANBBL
TSV
ZURCHERBBL2000 -
Martin Grainger Dean said:
So all these bibles were recently updated to appear in Cross References section
This. They should appear regardless of software version, as the resources were updated with the traits, not the software.
0 -
Thanks Dylan - my results are greatly improved.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
-
Thanks, Dylan, but I received no resource updates so far. It's only a metadata update?Dylan Rondeau said:
This. They should appear regardless of software version, as the resources were updated with the traits, not the software.0 -
Martin Grainger Dean said:
I received no resource updates so far. It's only a metadata update?
Yes, I believe it was just a metadata change, so we didn't need to rebuild the resources (which would require an update).
0 -
0
-
Dylan Rondeau said:
The following resources have had the "contains-cross-reference-footnotes" trait added:
Thanks, that's many more than I dared hope for (especially this soon).
However, one Bible I'm not seeing is Bibel 82. I wouldn't trouble you with it if it wasn't for the fact that, as you can see in one of my posts above, it turned out to be an exceptional Bible for [NT & Apocrypha] cross references. So, is there any chance you could add it? It can't be that much work if it's only metadata.
Also, am I correct in not seeing NASB and the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible on that list? They were among Mark's top 8.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
So, is there any chance you could add it?
fgh,
I added the trait. Please verify the resource shows up in the passage guide as expected after you have done a meta data sync.
Thanks!
0 -
Jannie van Niekerk said:
I added the trait.
Thanks, that was fast!
Jannie van Niekerk said:Please verify the resource shows up in the passage guide as expected after you have done a meta data sync.
Perhaps I'm just too tired, but I can't figure out how to verify that.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
Perhaps I'm just too tired, but I can't figure out how to verify that.
Sorry, I forgot that the section displays a combined(from all resources with the trait) list of verses only.
0 -
0