Visual Filter working nicely
I tried out the visual filter. It works very nicely and for me much easier to get than the 3.0 version.
I created a new filter, 3 items, used the interlinear to create one filter, named it, and created a new range of books to filter for the Gospels.
No crashes. Nice
Comments
-
BUT... I closed the visual filter, but the markings do not go away. I closed all my Bible and reopened them, and the markups come back even though the Visual Fiter is closed.
Is that right? Shouldn't the visual filters go away when I close the window?
What ahppens when I create multiple filters. Will they all show up all the time unless I delete them?
That does not seem to make sense?
0 -
By clicking the 3 circles button next to the interlinear button you should see a list of all available visual filters for this resource. You can uncheck your filter to turn it off.
0 -
0
-
It is cool now, but what happens when a person creates a dozen note files, and a half dozen visual filters. Would this get a bit cluttered with check boxes.
I still like the idea, but could there be a way to visually discern between Filters & Notes, & other items? A color difference maybe? A small icon next to the text?0 -
-
I get it now...nicely done!
Robert Pavich
For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__
0 -
0
-
I just noticed that if I open a second copy of a book and then try to turn off the visual filter it removes it from both books. It would be great if I could keep it open on one but off on the other.
0 -
Is there a way to "hide" a visual filter from showing up in the visual filter drop-down of a given resource? I can just imagine an unruly list of filters down the road. [:S]
Mitch
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.franklinchurchofchrist.com0 -
If you have that many you'll just have to delete some I'd think. How many filters do you need after all?
Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you.
0 -
How many filters do you need after all?
As many as I can think of using. [:P]
....Seriously, I want a filter with colored background to mark my own sections/periods of the Bible. For instance, I could be reading any of the prophets and visually see them as they correspond to their related passages in Kings/Chronicles, etc. Aside from Bible periods/events I would like to use the filters for certain topics (this is where I could use searches but want the flexibility of the visual filter). I know this second usage is where things could get unruly.
Mitch
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.franklinchurchofchrist.com0 -
I see your point Mitch. I've not really used visual filters - so I haven't had a chance to fall in love with them.
For me, they remain for the most part in the eye candy camp. Although even as I say that there are other areas where that's not exactly true.
Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you.
0 -
eye candy camp
Hi Tom,
I'd commend the "Active Reference" filter. When I'm searching BADG & have the active reference visual filter on, it's EASY to find any reference in the lexical entry to my verse. I don't know enough about the other visual filters (what's sympathetic highlighting, anyway?) for them to be more than eye candy for me, too, as yet.
Blessings to you, & thanks for all you do for this community!
Bill
Grace & Peace,
Bill
MSI GF63 8RD, I-7 8850H, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, 2TB HDD, NVIDIA GTX 1050Max
iPhone 12 Pro Max 512Gb
iPad 9th Gen iOS 15.6, 256GB0 -
I'm probably a complete idiot, but I'm trying to be honest about my ignorance to help build Logos 4 into a user-friendly program for not-so-advanced users.
So ... where is the assistance for morphology searching, such as you would use here for visual filters? In Logos 3 you had these simple check boxes to use to select morphology search criteria - where is all of that in v.4? It just seems like I'm presented with a blank box and I'm expected to know all the morphology codes myself?
0 -
Oh - I found another post saying that as soon as you type the @ sign it brings up the choices automatically, so that works nicely. But couldn't that be made slightly more self-explanatory? Instead of just the word "find" in that blank box, how about something like "type @ to find"
0 -
Oh - I found another post saying that as soon as you type the @ sign it brings up the choices automatically, so that works nicely. But couldn't that be made slightly more self-explanatory? Instead of just the word "find" in that blank box, how about something like "type @ to find"
It is pretty hidden. I hope they have something planned other then word of mouth and the help file to make it known. changing the default text like you suggested is not a bad call in my book.
0