Comments
Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 
You're going to have to state how many resources and what your machine specs are! Just bragging doesn't do it for me!
Work computer with the demo license and 10,546 resources.
The specs of the computer itself aren't all that impressive: E6750 Core 2 Duo at 2.66GHz with 8GB of RAM running Vista Business 64-bit and a WEI of 3.9.
Phil Gons wrote...
Hi Phil,
With over 1200 posts each, it's hopeless for most of us to catch Philip & Tom. Looks like you're the only one I could catch--and then only if I work really hard at it!
[;)]
Bill
Grace & Peace,
Bill
MSI GF63 8RD, I-7 8850H, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, 2TB HDD, NVIDIA GTX 1050Max
iPhone 12 Pro Max 512Gb
iPad 9th Gen iOS 15.6, 256GB
I have 32,048,479 in 28.55 sec, what's your's???
28,144,280 results in 1,234,241 articles (11.80 Sec)[:)]
2241 titles in Library
E8400 (3.0ghz core 2 duo)
intel motherboard with G35 integrated graphics
4G ram Windows 7 64
I have 21,842508 in 16.46 secs.
I just wanted to post this to thank Logos. I am running this on a 9 year old laptop.
Windows XP Media Center
Pentium 4 3.0 gHz, (with virtual dual core)
2 gig RAM
64MB Video RAM
80GB 5400rpm hard-drive
This is an extensive search, with a lot of hits. It handled it well for as old as it is. Overall, I find that it works well for Logos 4. Though it is not the fastest machine, it does well. I understand that the programming is video intensive, and some older systems do not handle it well, but this old system is doing well, while running multiple programs. Thank you, Logos for a great program!
mike
Windows 7, Nexus 7
thou shalst not lead me into computer envy..
Never Deprive Anyone of Hope.. It Might Be ALL They Have
From my desktop:
This is rather weird. I got better times with 2 gig of RAM than with 3.
Two gig: 0.09, 0.94, 18.50
Three gig: 0.38, 1.31, 19.84
Figure that one out. Resource numbers were the same as were the number of hits. In each case I killed all unnecessary services and programs prior to running the test.
Gerry
This is rather weird. I got better times with 2 gig of RAM than with 3.
Two gig: 0.09, 0.94, 18.50
Three gig: 0.38, 1.31, 19.84
Figure that one out. Resource numbers were the same as were the number of hits. In each case I killed all unnecessary services and programs prior to running the test.
Gerry
You probably lost performance due to the loss of Dual Channel RAM. I'm assuming you added another 1GB module to a system that previously had 2 x 1GB modules. If this is the case, your system's RAM is no longer running in Dual Channel. Going from Dual Channel to Single Channel does not cut performance in half. Typically you lose about 5-10% performance. This is consistent with your numbers (18.50 to 19.84 is a 7% loss). If you had 2 x 2GB modules (4GB) then you would be able to run in Dual Channel and have about the same performance as 2 x 1GB modules. Either way, I wouldn't expect the amount of RAM to affect the performance of this type of search. This type of search is most affected by drive speed, CPU speed, and RAM speed.
If you are using only Logos 4 with nothing else running in the background 2GB is usually sufficient. However, if you have several additional programs open in the background then you might start to see a performance gain with 3-4GB; especially the more you use Logos 4 per session.
Win 7 x64 | Core i7 2600k @ 4.6GHz | 8GB RAM @ 1866MHz | Intel SSD G2
I have 32,048,479 in 28.55 sec, what's your's???
So, what have you proven? I'm more interested in what it will do on a practical situation. I don't very often (NEVER) search for "the." A morph search with one lemma (perhaps in a particular case in Greek) in proximity to another lemma (again, possibly in a particular case in Greek) is far more significant than searching for a term such as "the" which I will never use.
george
gfsomsel
יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
So, what have you proven?
George,
I don't think that he was trying to PROVE anything....just having fun...
By the way....where is the OTHER grumpy old man from the balcony of the muppets show? 
Robert Pavich
For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__
So, what have you proven?George,
I don't think that he was trying to PROVE anything....just having fun...
By the way....where is the OTHER grumpy old man from the balcony of the muppets show?
I don't know any grumpy old men, do you?
george
gfsomsel
יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
So, what have you proven?George,
I don't think that he was trying to PROVE anything....just having fun...
By the way....where is the OTHER grumpy old man from the balcony of the muppets show?
I don't know any grumpy old men, do you?
Everybody knows that George is not old! [:D]
29,912,924 --- 27.48 secs.
:-)
735 Results in 26 my documents in 0.76 seconds
+
35,218 results in 3,719 articles (in new documents) (1.37 seconds)
+
36,305,469 Results in 1,381,798 articles in 92.19 seconds.