EGGNT

@bradley-grainger
Bradley,

Thanks for the response! Based on a quick perusal of these resources:

Matthew - OK
Mark - OK
Luke - OK
John - Extremely serious formatting problems. Paragraphs have neither first line indentation nor space between paragraphs, making it nearly impossible to follow. Outlines are not properly formatted at all. *Andreas J. Köstenberger's name is misspelled twice!*
Acts - OK
Romans - Outline formatting is missing. Section headings have no spacing between them. Most of the rest of the text is acceptable.
2 Corinthians - OK
Ephesians - OK
Philippians - Bibliography and abbreviation list formatting is considerably different than other volumes. I can't describe the opening pages properly, but you NEED to open this resource in Logos to see the front matter, which is highly "unprofessional" looking. In general, the text is OK.
Colossians & Philemon - Front matter is (I intend this as kindly as possible, here) quite nearly a total disaster. Outline and paragraph formatting are unreadable. I bought this book in print when it was FIRST published and it has been a prized scholarly resource. I have been waiting for YEARS for this to be available in Logos--I can only say that I was severely heart-broken to see it in this condition!
Hebrews - OK
1 Peter - Paragraph and outline formatting don't exist.

General considerations: When I search for "EGGNT" in my Library, the Titles of these resources are variously named. They are all from the same collection, so they should be consistent--as well as have similar covers. Several of the resources have the covers "inside the resource" rather than a "Title page" which is highly irregular. These are also listed as "Bible Commentary" resources Types, except for Romans, which is Typed as "Monograph." When opened, these resources are also displayed with various, inconsistent titles in the window title bar.

I can *fully* appreciate Logos wanting to get these volumes out quickly. After all, these resources are highly sought after--especially by me! However, for Logos to publish them in such a condition is, in my opinion (and I am trying to be loving here), highly unprofessional and reflects negatively on Logos and Faithlife as a whole. I have been with Logos Bible Software since 2.0 (or earlier), and I have not *ever* seen resources like these before.

I have done proof-reading for B&H Academic (and I would LOVE to do the same work for Logos), and my goal has always been to protect the author's and the publisher's credibility. If I fail as a proof-reader, readers have less confidence in the author and publisher. These newly published resources give me less confidence in future Logos resources.

I would "prefer" that Logos simply pull these resources from publication until they get fixed (if that is even possible).

Thanks for listening to my concerns.

Grace and Peace be with you all.

@bradley-grainger
Philippians was updated this morning and it looks much better. There are still a few tweaks that need to be done on the Main Outline for the book, but this is a great improvement over its state of affairs yesterday.

Thanks!