I found a few resource. Mind you, this is a difficult question to research in a large Logos library, it's one that I think Logos should think about as an example of how to pore over thousands of resources trying to find a unique relationship between common words like historical - Jesus - resurrection etc.!

Also, I will say - the Bible is clear that Jesus revealed his risen self to his disciples (Acts 13-14 for one).  He did that out of God's great respect for our free choice and the role of faith and grace in our lives.  It's the same reasoning that God could force us to believe if he chose to, but he wont'. So given that God's gift of faith is what permits us to believe, you can't ever expect to prove anything about Jesus Christ to someone (even though we believe it to be true).

That said - here are a couple of references that speak to your question. Hope it helps!

Flavius Josephus

Next to the Bible in importance, the works of Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, AD 37–95, are the most authoritative ancient source for illuminating the people, places, and events recorded in the Old and New Testaments. He was born in Jerusalem only four years after Jesus’ crucifixion.

In his book Jewish Antiquities, 18:63, Josephus records: “About this time lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was the achiever of extraordinary deeds and was a teacher of those who accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. When he was indicted by the principal men among us and Pilate condemned him to be crucified, those who had come to love him originally did not cease to do so; for he appeared to them on the third day restored to life, as the prophets of the Deity had foretold these and countless other marvelous things about him. And the tribe of Christians, so named after him, has not disappeared to this day.”

Eighteen non-Christian sources can be traced back to the first century

Dr. G.R. Habermas has discovered that within 110 years of Christ’s crucifixion, eighteen non-Christian sources mention more than “one hundred facts, beliefs, and teachings from the life of Christ and early Christendom. These items, I might add, mention almost every major detail of Jesus’ life, including miracles, the Resurrection, and His claims to deity.”

Mark Water, Hard Questions About the Bible Made Easy, The Made Easy Series, 10-11 (Alresford, Hampshire: John Hunt Publishers Ltd, 2000).

A Jewish archaeologist

Nelson Gluek has said, “It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible.”

Mark Water, Hard Questions About the Bible Made Easy, The Made Easy Series, 10 (Alresford, Hampshire: John Hunt Publishers Ltd, 2000).

For those who still think there should have been even more written about Jesus, New Testament scholar Craig Blomberg offers four reasons why that’s not a reasonable expectation: 1) the humble beginnings of Christianity; 2) the remote location of Palestine on the eastern frontiers of the Roman Empire; 3) the small percentage of the works of ancient Graeco-Roman historians that have survived (this could be due to loss, decay, destruction, or all of the above); and 4) the lack of attention paid by surviving historical documents to Jewish figures in general.36

Nevertheless, some skeptics still think there should be testimony from some of the 500 people who allegedly saw the risen Christ. Skeptic Farrell Till is one of them. During a debate on the Resurrection that I (Norm) had with him in 1994, Till demanded, “Trot out one of those 500 witnesses or give us something that they wrote, and we will accept that as reliable proof or evidence.”37

This is an unreasonable expectation, for a number of reasons. First, as we have already pointed out, first-century Palestine was an oral culture. Most people were illiterate and remembered and passed on information orally.

Second, how many of those predominately illiterate eyewitnesses would have written something even if they could write? Even today, with a much higher literacy rate and all the conveniences of modern writing and research tools, how many people do you know who have written a book or even an article on any subject? How many do you know who have written a book or article on a contemporary historical event, even a significant event like 9/11? Probably not many, and certainly fewer than one out of 500. (Has Farrell Till ever written an article on a major historical event he witnessed?)

Third, even if some of those 500 average people did write down what they saw, why would skeptics expect their testimony to survive for 2,000 years? The New Testament survives intact because of the thousands of manuscripts copied by scribes for a growing church over the centuries. Historical works from the major ancient historians such as Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny survive on just a handful of copies, and those copies are hundreds of years from the originals. Why do the skeptics think anything is going to be written, much less survive, from an ancient group of illiterate Galilean peasants?38

Finally, we do know the names of many of the 500, and their testimony is written down in the New Testament. They include Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul, and James—plus nine who are named elsewhere as apostles (Matthew 10 and Acts 1).

So we shouldn’t expect more testimony than what we have about Jesus. And what we do have is more than enough to establish historicity.

Norman L. Geisler and Frank Turek, I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, 247-48 (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 2004).

Richard DeRuiter said:

Finally, we must admit that our faith does not rest on the standards of veracity established by skeptics,

If we are dealing with the modern "skeptics" we will find they do not accept anything attributed to Josephus as reliable. They claim it has been tainted by church historians, re-writing it in a favorable light.

There are a couple new collections in Pre-Pub that will be of importance to studies of Josephus:
Brill Josephus and History Collection (2 Vols.) http://www.logos.com/products/prepub/details/6833
Brill Josephus and the Bible Collection (4 Vols.) http://www.logos.com/products/prepub/details/6878

The writings of Josephus are not part of any canon that I am aware and do have apparent historical inaccuracies. I ran across one such error this week documented in the Aramaic Papyri of the Fifth Century BC  (only available in the Portfolio Edition) where Josephus later errs concerning Darius II and Darius III.

 So no matter how many "unbiased facts" are lined up, some people just refuse to believe.

Mark A. Smith said:

I don't have anyhting to add, but wonder if someone would like to contribute a Reading List on the resources mentioned? The title might be: Jesus: Extra-Biblical Evidence or something like that.

Added : http://topics.logos.com/Jesus$3a_Extra-Biblical_Evidence

Everyone feel free to add reading links.

Bohuslav Wojnar said:

Would be great to have more of those books (Strobel, McDowell) in Logos.

[Y]

I really enjoyed reading New Evidence that Demands a Verdict by Josh McDowell too, which covers this question as well. I would buy that in a heartbeat if it was in Logos format.

Bohuslav Wojnar said:

Many years ago I have been helped very much by the book of Josh McDowell, Resurrection Factor.

Also very good book (and much more recent) is Lee Strobel's The Case for Christ.

Would be great to have more of those books (Strobel, McDowell) in Logos.

Yes to both authors.

I found another book in Pre-Pub:: "The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ"    that is part of this collection:
Kirsopp Lake New Testament Backgrounds Collection (5 Vols.) http://www.logos.com/products/prepub/details/6402

But it does not seem near as helpful as N.T. Wright's  "The Resurrection of the Son of God"  that is part of this collection:
Christian Origins and the Question of God Series, by N. T. Wright (Vols. 1–3)  http://www.logos.com/products/details/5223

A couple of other texts that might be of interest:

          Who moved the stone? by Frank Morrison -- I found a complete copy on line, but
          am not sure if it is a legal copy

          Trial of the Witnesses of the Resurrection of Jesus by Thomas Sherlock -- a free
          copy this is available for Kindle.  Since this is an older work, you may find other 
          copies as well. 

Neither of these are available in LOGOS.

Bohuslav Wojnar said:

The first one might be very interesting, although quite dated (1907). In this kind of subject I tend to look for some more recent books.

I did  some further checking on the first title. You can access a full view on G00gle B--ks and read for yourself. It seems to be based wholly on internal documentary evidence. I doubt it is useful to quote from it if you are speaking with anyone who rejects the Bible completely. I do think it may be useful to share with people to show a cohesiveness of the resurrection message. There is one negative G00gle B--ks review of it.

The original request of this thread is a difficult one to fulfill. Although the Bible records quite a number of witnesses to the resurrected Christ, their testimonies don't seem to be recorded elsewhere and the witnesses are all gone now. It would be a wonderful discovery to find such extra-Biblical documentation. But as has been said so eloquently above:

Lynden Williams said:

For those who believe no evidence is necessary, for those who disbelieve, no evidence is sufficient.