A Plea for a Functional "Biblical Places" on Mac
I have reported bugginess with Logos for Mac's Biblical Places before, but it continues to be a very buggy aspect of Logos for Mac. Therefore, I am pleading with you, Logos, to make this aspect of Logos for Mac functional.
As it stands now, Biblical Places jumps, jolts, and stutters whenever I lookup a city/place. If I attempt to change maps it zooms way out, spikes my Mac's processor for several seconds, and then jolts all over the place before finally zooming in. I can't even scroll through the maps at the bottom of the Biblical Places screen without encounter stuttering. And I can't tell you how frustrating it is to have to go through eight zooming, stuttering, spasmatic map changes to find the one map you want/need. Yes, I can preview the maps by hovering, but I rarely find the best map on my first couple of attempts.
I appreciate the functionality that Biblical Places is attempting to provide (i.e. measuring of distances, linking to google earth, showing the relationships between maps, etc). However, at this point a simple slideshow format to the maps would be much better for study. All I want to do is access the maps I have in my library, but I cannot. At this point, the functionality of the Logos "Atlas" is actually worse than using a dead-tree version.
Therefore, I ask: Isn't this program supposed to be saving my time? As it stands now it takes me five minutes to do what I can do in a book in about 30 seconds with a ruler.
This seems like such basic functionality for a Bible program, I cannot believe I am even having to ask for this to be fixed.
Comments
- PC Biblical Places has G button for Google Maps to show coordinates, which is missing on Mac
- PC Biblical Places map animation and transition is much faster than Mac
Thanks Jonathan! I didn't know you could scroll through the maps/images at the bottom using the arrow keys (I'm on the PC version).
But you're right ... even on the PC version the animation is nutty (when scrolling). Looks like they were applying 'googlification', so us trendy Logos users would feel even more trendy.
I know you're speaking to the Mac, but I think they ought to take the whole map/image routines and calm down their trendiness. On a touch screen you can't zoom in. The maps are random (ever seen a Bible with the maps in the back all random?). You have to mouse over the little images just to see what they are; I'm not sure who thought the thumbnails for maps made sense. If you see a map you like, try finding it later (yes there's 'search').
But yes .. first bring the Mac routines up to speed.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
I can't even scroll through the maps at the bottom of the Biblical Places screen without encounter stuttering.
What do you mean? Is there a way to scroll through the maps? The only way I've found to get to the 'hidden' maps is to click the right arrow one time for each new map.
Updated wiki Mac and PC User Interface Differences => Feature Parity with two references to this thread:
To make it even more weird I just realized the arrow on the upper ribbon in Biblical places works in neither of these two ways, but in a third: you can't hold, you have to click and let go, but when you do, it doesn't move one step like the maps, but all the visible columns move out of sight and the next set appears. Don't know how the PC works here.
In other words I have 3 visible right arrows above each other -- shortcut bar, upper ribbon and lower/map ribbon -- and they all work in different ways. Yeah, that's consistent...
I do have the G button, though, so if you don't it's yet another regression (I'm still on 4.5a).
Isn't this program supposed to be saving my time?
Save? By now I'd be shouting with joy if they could get this program to work well enough to let me do half as much work as I could if I had these books on paper... I probably haven't done 2 weeks worth of work in the last 20 months -- unless you count the thousands of hours I've worked for Logos without pay. Or worse than without pay, as I am, after all, paying for the 'privilege' of finding and reporting the bugs they should have found and removed before release.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
I do have the G button, though, so if you don't it's yet another regression (I'm still on 4.5a).
Score another point for 4.5b. Has Logos even acknowledged these regressions?
I do have the G button, though, so if you don't it's yet another regression (I'm still on 4.5a).Score another point for 4.5b. Has Logos even acknowledged these regressions?
I find it ironic that the UserVoice Feature Parity Suggestion states "This is an ongoing effort, and while we don’t have an exact date for when it will be completed, each major release will increase the parity between Mac and Windows." Yet one word that is often repeated in the feature parity entry on the Logos wiki is "regression."
I do have the G button, though, so if you don't it's yet another regression (I'm still on 4.5a).Score another point for 4.5b. Has Logos even acknowledged these regressions?
I find it ironic that the UserVoice Feature Parity Suggestion states "This is an ongoing effort, and while we don’t have an exact date for when it will be completed, each major release will increase the parity between Mac and Windows." Yet one word that is often repeated in the feature parity entry on the Logos wiki is "regression."
While Logos 4.5b added social networking, have verified a dozen regressions so wiki Feature Parity list has many regression comments because Logos 4.5b on a Mac is a mixture of forward and backward progress. Personally surprised by number of Logos 4.5b regressions on Mac.
When Logos improves feature parity between Mac and PC, anticipating (hoping) for Feature Parity list to become much smaller. Wonder what progress to expect in Logos 4.5c ?
Keep Smiling [:)]
There are a lot of problems with Biblical Places/Logos Maps. The animation feature is more of a hassel than anything. My biggest gripe is it takes way TOOO long to load each map. For a program that is supposed to have everything on the hard drive, it takes just as long (if not longer that) it would take if they were online maps, pictures, books, etc. Scrolling in books (especially Bibles) takes longer than it does on most websites (major gripe here). Biblical Places have too few maps for specific Biblical events, and major highways are not highlighted in every map (very few of them in fact), and other roads going from towns (based upon geography of course) are completely excluded, so those who use Biblical Places won't have any idea of how people actually would have traveled (this is a major gripe for me. Since I am in the process of becoming a scholar, if the above things are not fixed, I will have to get Accordance at some point). I have listed many other gripes and suggestions for extending the Maps and Biblical Places in another thread. A MAJOR gripe of mine is that in larger maps (with many cities) the map does NOT EVER zoom TO the city, nor does it highlight it (making it easier to find). That NEEDS to change! The zooming all the way out and then back in (to the point that one can see the whole area of the map) is more trouble than it is worth. It should be 5 times faster than that. It should be "click on map, it pops up immediately showing the whole map specific area, with the city that is being searched for highlighted". There should also be the ability to add cities (especially if one is looking for specific cities within a certain area with certain things highlighted (such as topography, mountains or hill, valleys, etc.) so that we get what we want (since not every map has everything that I am looking for). Another gripe is that when I zoom in to a certain area and I want to print just that specific area that I am zoomed to, I can't. It prints the whole map area that is available in that view. Also, there should be the ability for us to highlight specific areas, routes, landmarks, topography, and print those highlights out (say for a class or a Bible Study, etc), but that is not possible either. Biblical Places is way TOO basic with not enough of the right things, but too much of the annoying things.
There are a lot of problems with Biblical Places/Logos Maps.
Amen!
The animation feature is more of a hassel than anything.
Preach It!
I will have to get Accordance at some point.
Done. Logos's failure to respond to these kind of issues keeps making Accordance Modules more and more attractive. [Logos: check my buying history and you will notice a steep decline in my buying history since about two months ago. Guess where those sales went!]
too much of the annoying things.
So True!
Amen Caleb, and it's not just in the maps area, it's a system wide issue for me.
Just an FYI, there is a Logos User Voice suggestion "Reimagine" Maps - Have Non-Static Maps that you all can vote for (if you have not already).
If the old USENET style of newsgroups that Logos used to run was still around, you could find complaints about Logos Maps and multiple requests that Logos improve them. This is a request that is years old now. In the focus in text libraries, IMHO it has been a poor cousin for some time.... at least since Logos Bible Atlas there hasn't been anything to get excited about.
[quote]A MAJOR gripe of mine is that in larger maps (with many cities) the map does NOT EVER zoom TO the city, nor does it highlight it (making it easier to find). That NEEDS to change!
This is one of my many disappointments as well. I honestly don't know how anyone could call this user friendly.
[quote] I will have to get Accordance at some point)
It is light years ahead of Logos maps. Being able to turn on layers (different time periods, including modern locations), manipulate your map, distances, etc. and even click in an integrated way for graphics on a given location is really, really nice. It is my 'go to' for Maps every time.
[quote] I will have to get Accordance at some point)
It is light years ahead of Logos maps. Being able to turn on layers (different time periods, including modern locations), manipulate your map, distances, etc. and even click in an integrated way for graphics on a given location is really, really nice. It is my 'go to' for Maps every time.
Yes, this is one of the places where Accordance clearly outdistances the competition [Y]
Scrolling in books (especially Bibles) takes longer than it does on most websites (major gripe here).
[Y][Y][Y][Y][Y][Y][Y][Y][Y][Y]
major highways are not highlighted in every map (very few of them in fact), and other roads going from towns (based upon geography of course) are completely excluded, so those who use Biblical Places won't have any idea of how people actually would have traveled (this is a major gripe for me.
How much do we actually know about where roads went? Unless there are clear archaeological finds, or clear written descriptions, I'd prefer that they don't mark roads. I don't want to be tricked into believing that a guess is a fact.
Another gripe is that when I zoom in to a certain area and I want to print just that specific area that I am zoomed to, I can't. It prints the whole map area that is available in that view.
Have you tried using a screen shot?
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
I did find a work around for some of the Logos maps. If you have access to the Faithlife Study Bible there is a section labeled "maps" at the end of the study bible material. You can then at least scroll through the maps without all the lag.
major highways are not highlighted in every map (very few of them in fact), and other roads going from towns (based upon geography of course) are completely excluded, so those who use Biblical Places won't have any idea of how people actually would have traveled (this is a major gripe for me.How much do we actually know about where roads went? Unless there are clear archaeological finds, or clear written descriptions, I'd prefer that they don't mark roads. I don't want to be tricked into believing that a guess is a fact.
I do appreciate at least having a general idea or "guestimate" made by scholars as to the location of the roads, "lost" cities, exodus routes, etc. However, it would be beneficial to know who is doing the guessing and upon what basis the guesses are made. This is another weakness to the current software based models (over against the dead-tree paper atlas). With a paper atlas you will often have comments as to what led scholars to make certain conclusions or guesses. With the software based "Biblical places" model you don't see anything besides the map. You have no idea who made the map (besides a Logos Logo in the lower corner) and no idea if the people behind the map are making reliable, educated decisions.
+1 [Y] for option to turn off animation in Biblical Places; possibly with a button next to Fit for a zoom out and in when desired for location overview.
Using Logos 4.5b SR-1, opened Biblical Places, then searched for Jerusalem, scrolled bottom completely to the left so had 4 maps with white backgrounds on left side, then clicked far left map, started stopwatch timer, then clicked each map to the right, waiting for animation to complete before clicking next map. Stopped on the 15th map, which has a white background.
Couple maps took over 20 seconds to zoom out, show Mediterranean Sea (with long enough pause to wonder if Logos 4.5b SR-1 had stopped working on request for a Jerusalem map), then scroll until map fit window (with animation placing destination map a bit off center while zooming in). To click 15 maps, took 4 minutes 24 seconds on an iMac with 2.93 GHz i7, which is an average of 17.6 seconds.
In contrast, Logos 4.5b SR-1 on Windows 7 took 49 seconds to click the same 15 maps for Jerusalem, an average of 3.3 seconds (tolerable). The map zoom out was only enough to show boundaries of new map, then zoomed in to fit and center map in floating window. Also noticed G button in Windows for another feature parity difference:
Updated wiki Mac and PC User Interface Differences => Feature Parity with two references to this thread:
Keep Smiling [:)]