LOGOS seems unbalanced in being Non-Denominational
Comments
-
MJ. Smith said:
Read Chapter V of Part II of The Word of God in the Life and Mission of the Church. I'm assuming you don't have it in Logos.
Does this imply that it is available in Logos for those who would want it? I would love to have it if so. Couldn't find it in Verbum Capstone or anywhere. Do you have it as a PB?
0 -
I thought it was in prepubs but I don't see it. A straight .docx copy ... no work on links yet ... is on its way.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Hey Luigi: Man, People have tried to be polite, helpful and understanding, yet no amount of this from them has helped.
You keep saying Catholics have to have their own version of Logos, separate from Protestants.
So let me set you straight on that.
It's not even true, you don't understand what you don't understand and no amount of us trying to explain it to you is going to help because you don't "want " to understand.
If you did/do understand, you would still post your silly accusations.
Orthodox, Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans and others have not demanded "our own Logos". We have all owned lots of different things.
Personally, I own Accordance, Logos, Biblesoft, Olivetree. I have a physical library of a few thousand books as well.
Orthodox, Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans etc. Have a habit of reading and using everyone that has something of value to say. Thus our libraries usually have the best of work from all disciplines , that means protestant too.
I have owned Logos for long before a Catholic version was a thought, before a catholic library was available and was one of many that requested more catholic, anglican, lutheran, orthodox resources just as I recently requested yet more Orthodox resources.
The members of these Forums have a wonderful habit of getting along, making room for each others frustrations when Logos does not work correctly and until now, I have never seen denominational backgrounds become an issue. ( I feel sure it has at some time, just never seen it before).
Personally, I never even look. I have learned a great deal here and been helped by Baptists, Pentecostals, Orthodox, Catholics, Non-Denominationals and all others.
I can't count the times an evangelical scholar that works in original languages has helped orthodox/catholic/ ext. with some issue in that area ( me included ). "Keep Smiling for Jesus" does not seem to care one iota what someones background is, if you have a problem, he is going to try and help, just like everyone else here.
The members of this forum care first and foremost that everyone is able to get their studies done, lessons prepared, Sermon's finished, Papers for school turned in, books written etc.
I can't count the times I have been stuck, Logos broken, up to my eyeballs in frustration and the people here, no matter what background, have rescued me so I could get work done.
Not one time-EVER- has anyone said: Oh, your one of those catholics , we aren't going to help you-not ever.
Logos is a business. If you don't like their business model, thats fine, we all understand, we all have frustrations with certain things from them, from time to time. We might not like the way a new product is rolled out, the way something is sold/upgraded etc, etc.
Yes, like you, we will come here, we will vent, we will discuss it, we show our frustrations .
Yet, at the end of the day each of us is faced with the same decision to make: Does this PRODUCT meet my needs. If it does, we buy it and use it, if not, we don't, it's that simple.
Bob ( The owner of Logos ) has been pretty good about getting on the forums and explaining why they do the things they do, explaining his business plan. At the end of the day, we can either buy it, or not, it's just that simple.
The nice thing about this huge library of Logo's resources is we can buy what we want, skip what we don't want . If you buy a large "library" you are going to have a lot you will use, a lot you will not use very often, some you may never have any use for at all.
It is what it is.
This is a great forum of folks from all backgrounds . If you stick around, you are going to run into issues with Logos at some point, of some kind. You will find the help you need here, and no one will care what your background is. You will get help from Baptists, Catholics, Orthodox, Pentecostals, Lutherans, Charismatics, Jewish, etc. If you have a problem they will jump in like it's their own problem. That sounds like Christians to me.
So please, stop with the Catholic resources need warning labels and think a little bit, a bit more deeply. Do you want "Warning" labels on Calvinist materials, Luther's works, Pentecostal works?
Personally, I work towards unity, toward understanding, towards education.
The times we live in require it.
If you don't have use for Verbum and or any catholic resources, don't buy them, it's just that simple.
We wouldn't dream of forcing them on you or anyone else.
Blessings.
0 -
Luigi Sam said: "the word "Church" in point 133 could mean Church as in frequently & regularly going to church where the word will be read."
see point 131 where it mentions the Church and the Children of the Church.
No, this is does not mean just going to church.
0 -
Congratulations to Your 500th post, Fr. Charles!
I have a comparatively small library and often a lack of time (so I would read more during the study semesters if I would have time). I agree, I've also expanded my library to contain much from denominations that are not very close matches to my beliefs. (But I don't have different software.)
Here's a test result what two denominations matches my beliefs: ____________
I'm in the process of hiding more and more of my books, but even though there's a couple of hundred books I could hide straight away I hesitate because hiding them would not necessarily help me that much after all. Often I grow secure in my beliefs when I have contrasted them, but that doesn't have to do with the appeal or lack thereof of other beliefs but rather a sifting: I want to use what's possible to use, from the books I have:Fr. Charles R. Matheny said:Personally, I own Accordance, Logos, Biblesoft, Olivetree. I have a physical library of a few thousand books as well.
Orthodox, Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans etc. Have a habit of reading and using everyone that has something of value to say. Thus our libraries usually have the best of work from all disciplines , that means protestant too.
Disclosure!
trulyergonomic.com
48G AMD octacore V9.2 Acc 120 -
Posted to wrong thread - found the better one - and don't see the delete option
0 -
David Ames said:
Posted to wrong thread - found the better one - and don't see the delete option
It is located under the "More" button, but you have a limited time to do that (somewhere around 10 hours, I believe). Also, after someone has responded, you will not be able to delete your post.
0 -
Jack Caviness said:David Ames said:
Posted to wrong thread - found the better one - and don't see the delete option
It is located under the "More" button, but you have a limited time to do that (somewhere around 10 hours, I believe). Also, after someone has responded, you will not be able to delete your post.
According to http://wiki.logos.com/Using_the_Forum#Editing_or_deleting_posts you just have a few minutes to delete a post. I think the 10 hour window is for editing.
0 -
Graham Criddle said:
you just have a few minutes to delete a post. I think the 10 hour window is for editing.
[:$] You are correct [:$]
0 -
Andrew Blye said:
I rather thought that Logos seems to have quite the Reformed leaning based upon the selection of titles, especially in the lower-level packages. Once upgrading to Platinum it's nice to have some resources from a Wesleyan/Armenian perspective.
No one else has replied to your point, Andrew, but I will. Having been with Logos several years now, there's just no way anyone can look me in the eye (metaphorically speaking, of course) and, with a straight face, argue what you've said. The company really looks to me to be catering far more to Reformed folks than any other group. Certainly the Calvinists have far more material offered to them than those of us that are of a Wesleyan/Arminian/Pentecostal persuasion. Just look at the spokesmen they've chose to advertise the new Logos 5. And I love several of the people that are doing the advertising, so it's not that I'm anti-this or anti-that. It's just that I'd like to see a little more balance in what is offered under the Protestant "umbrella" with Logos. For the last year or so I don't believe the ratio of releases has been balanced in this regard (Reformed/Baptist vs Wesleyan/Pentecostal). And before anyone says it, yes I know that there's simply far more material that has been written from the Reformed/Baptist position than the other side. But when a Wesleyan/Arminian classic like Adam Clarke's Commentary isn't even available for Logos 4 or 5 users something is really, really amiss.
0 -
Fr. Charles R. Matheny said:
If you don't have use for Verbum and or any catholic resources, don't buy them, it's just that simple.
People in this thread continually and
on purpose are trying to down play this - changing the subject to "but their are libraries for other denominations"The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.
IE all denominations are treated the
same. Verbum breaks this model.Im not arguing that there should be no
catholic versions of base packages.I am arguing:
1. only catholics get to create their
own versions of base packages2. only catholics get to rebrand logos
to Verbum . (and advertise it as "logos for Catholics")0 -
-
Good Grief guy.
0 -
Luigi Sam said:
The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.
Check the date of the first Logos product labelled as Catholic. Hint: it was distributed on "floppies" not CD's.
I find the forums best used for asking, listening and sharing and embarrass myself in threads such as this where my need for accuracy and precision draws me into an argument I should have left alone. [:$] [:#]
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
MJ. Smith said:Luigi Sam said:
The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.
Check the date of the first Logos product labelled as Catholic. Hint: it was distributed on "floppies" not CD's.
I find the forums best used for asking, listening and sharing and embarrass myself in threads such as this where my need for accuracy and precision draws me into an argument I should have left alone.
Hi MJ
wow Really? was the original logos software product as a whole originally advertised as a Catholic product?
Also what I kind of meant is that in the forums it seems LOGOS is insistently advertised as a non - denominational platform, and that no bias will shape the Logos software product (engine/platform) advertising, nor will it seek to actively promote any denomination in any sense except for the obvious advertising of books and sets of books.
Instead of "ORIGINAL" I Should have SAID: THE BASIC & ASSUMED LOGOS MODEL that every-one seemingly understands LOGOS to promote itself as, in recent years - this it is a non-denominational focused business that does not promote any denomination above another ( as a company ) regardless of the personal conviction of its workers or users.
0 -
I've heard it said that the reason there are so many more Reformed resources is just because those Germans are just so wordy.
J/K
Thank you for responding to my post Gary. Yes, it would certainly seem that way and just as I had posted on the other thread about "warning labels" I could argue that there should be warning labels on all the Calvinist resources, but then again that would probably mean the vast majority of the library would be censored.
I am not afraid of reading publications from differing theological viewpoints. After all, that's part of how we grow and learn: not just ingesting the same dogmatic positions over and over that merely reinforce our own theological leanings.
That being said, yes I would like to see a far greater amount of Wesleyan and Pentecostal writings in particular. I recently upgraded to Platinum and was very happy to see some Wesleyan commentaries, and Praise Jesus, "Foundations of Pentecostal Theology"!I have it in hardback, but it was great to have it in my Logos library.
0 -
I am a Catholic user of Logos. If you look at my previous posts in other threads, you will see that I was a staunch advocate for Logos offering more products that would be of interest to Catholic users. I have been very happy to see Logos respond to their Catholic user base. When I bought Logos 4, I was disappointed by the number of books that catered to Protestant Christians. However, I need to add that there is much that can be learned from other theological perspectives, and I have enjoyed reading and learned from the many Protestant theologians. The issue for me was mainly that I wanted to use Logos mainly for studying the Bible in conjunction with Catholic theological writers. Logos has always predominantly catered to the Protestant spectrum -- until now.
Logos has adopted an interesting strategy. They created Verbum. I am not sure if that was necessary, but I can understand it from a marketing point of view. I know that they have hired specialists to advise the company on how to create a better package for Catholic users. One of them has a PhD in Historical Theology from my alma mater Saint Louis University. That means that is probably only going to improve as time goes on.
My general impression of the Catholic packages is that has a lot of dated theological works. There is a need to get more contemporary Catholic books in the database. I see that happening with partnerships with Ignatius Press and similar publishing houses.
Interestingly, I decided not to upgrade to Verbum. Instead, I chose to do the minimal Logos upgrade. It is better for me to just buy the select titles that I know will be useful to my own study.
Before concluding here, I would like to respond to a comment a person made about Catholics and Bible study. Lay people in the Catholic Church are encouraged to read, study, and pray the Bible assiduously. Remember, it was St. Jerome who wrote, "Ignorance of the scriptures is ignorance of Christ." I am grateful to Logos for creating an excellent product that helps me delve more deeply in the God's Word.
0 -
Jeremy Kritt said:
"Ignorance of the scriptures is ignorance of Christ."
for its context one can read:
http://deadtheologians.blogspot.com.au/2009/10/ignorance-of-scripture-is-ignorance-of.html (warning this is just a link to the first complete quote I found) ...
0 -
Luigi, what was the purpose of that link?
0 -
Jeremy, there is even a need for Logos to get more current and contemporary Protestant books. I would love to see more current titles, but I know that also comes down to licensing issues.
0 -
What if we had a chart:
Title | Software Optimized for use with : | Resource listed as | Set Verbum to
Verbum | Catholic Resources | Catholic, and Others | Yes
Logos | For General Use | General, Many Catholic | No
Sometime, while running Logos 5, turn on the home page then
type 'Set Verbum to Yes' in the command box
Then type 'Set Verbum to No' in the command box
And report back your results of what you see
0 -
2,068
...no more, no less...
[8-|]
[The number of angels that can stand on the head of a pin]
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
Luigi Sam said:Dan Francis said:
Logos is a company, it offers many things for many different users, in offering Verbum, Logos removed what some had seen as a controversial preference selection of catholic/protestant.
Why cant the Original Logos Packages be advertised as Logos for Protestants Then?
The words "Logos for Protestants" That is what I want to even it out fairly.
I was raised in the Lutheran tradition and now worship in the Anglican traditions and a large portion of us do not see ourselves as Protestants… Perhaps we should have a protestant collection and rename Logos as evangelical. I can almost promise you if the Catholic works were added into the default packages there would be many people complaining about being force to buy "Papist crap" * . By tailoring a package for Catholics and those of us who appreciate catholic scholarship they make, in general everyone happy. No one is being forced to have items they don't want, and catholics get works geared to them. Personally I would be happy to have the items added into to existing packages, but I would imagine a significant number of Logos users would not like it.
-Dan
* I chose my words because the hateful phrase I feel underlies the whole thread. RC are not evil and while I hate many of the homophobic and sexist things that the current Pope has written Ratzinger is a wonderful scholar and a fair leader, I oppose Papal infallibility and most marian dogma, but I have many catholic in laws who feel the same.
0 -
Luigi Sam said:Catholics dont want to support a non-denominational product (Logos for all) with Catholic libraries available.
Catholics require a Catholic version of Logos called Verbum.Verbum is basically catholic Libraries, and as I have said it is more about making things easier with the treatment of Bible using the historical Alexandrian Canon of scriptures verses the traditional Hebrew Canon. When there was an option in a beta version I remember many people complaining about it. By offering Verbum people wanting little to do with what they consider worthless books are happy and people who value the deutocanonical books can be made happy. Catholics were happy with catholic Libraries it was the non- catholics throwing up a fuss.
-Dan
0 -
The thing that escapes me in this whole thread is what its purpose is. Luigi, dude...I don't get who you're fighting for or why. You seem to think that there's some Great Spiritual Battle to be won regarding what or how Logos sells what it sells. That's just silly. I don't fully agree with ANYTHING I have in my Logos library except for the Scriptures. I still have almost 6,500 resources, because we should not be ignorant of the enemy's devices. You disagree with RC?? Then READ RC stuff, and know that you do...or maybe don't. Worrying about what the blind, ignorant, and lazy might become contaminated with is pointless...they are already contaminated with blindness, ignorance, and laziness. You CAN'T combat those things with warning lables or "must read" or "can't read" lists. That's impossible. I share (to some degree) your distaste for certain dogmas, but if your battle isn't Bible-based, it is near about pointless. Just remember, you can't change a leopard's spots any more than it can...and insisting on trying is stupid. To do so risks becoming as inbalanced as those things you condemn.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
Luigi Sam said:
wow Really? was the original logos software product as a whole originally advertised as a Catholic product?
LOGOS sold catholic collections from close to the start, I was lucky enough to find one of the old catholic scholars packages New in Box a few years back. which i believe was labeled 1998.
-Dan
0 -
David Paul said:
2,068
...no more, no less...
[The number of angels that can stand on the head of a pin]
ANGELS DON'T DANCE, THEY ARE BAPTISTS AS IS GOD AND JESUS… [6]
0 -
Dan Francis said:David Paul said:
2,068
...no more, no less...
[The number of angels that can stand on the head of a pin]
ANGELS DON'T DANCE, THEY ARE BAPTISTS AS IS GOD AND JESUS…
He said "STAND" not "DANCE"
0 -
David Paul said:
The thing that escapes me in this whole thread is what its purpose is? Luigi, dude...I don't get who you're fighting for or why? You seem to think that there's some Great Spiritual Battle to be won regarding what or how Logos sells what it sells. That's just silly...
Well written indeed! This one gets two Amens and two thumbs up![Y][Y]
חַפְּשׂוּ בַּתּוֹרָה הֵיטֵב וְאַל תִּסְתַּמְּכוּ עַל דְּבָרַי
0 -
Post deleted by author.0
-
Surely, if we just concentrate on what the Bible says, we don't need to argue over catholic / protestant
0 -
Phil, I think we are talking about the theological orientations of the packages that Logos has put together. I understand that you are trying to be clever, but I am not sure how your post contributes to our conversation.
If you resort to a fundamentalist point of view, then what is the point of engaging here? I highly doubt anyone is going to win converts on these discussion boards. If you are using Logos, there is a good chance that you are clear on what you believe. That is true of everyone else. We are here to discuss the Logos can be improved to suit our diverse needs. This is not the place to instigate theological debates.
0 -
David Ames said:Dan Francis said:David Paul said:
2,068
...no more, no less...
[The number of angels that can stand on the head of a pin]
ANGELS DON'T DANCE, THEY ARE BAPTISTS AS IS GOD AND JESUS…
He said "STAND" not "DANCE"
Sorry my bad… the traditionally the question was "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" One comedian had the response i shared above… Dance is a wonderful thing.. even though since i am almost in a wheel chair not something I do much of any more.
-Dan
0 -
phil stilliard said:
Surely, if we just concentrate on what the Bible says, we don't need to argue over catholic / protestant
Here, here when Christians start arguing over such trivialities only one is happy is Satan.
-Dan
0 -
David Paul said:
The thing that escapes me in this whole thread is what its purpose is. Luigi, dude...I don't get who you're fighting for or why. You seem to think that there's some Great Spiritual Battle to be won regarding what or how Logos sells what it sells. That's just silly. I don't fully agree with ANYTHING I have in my Logos library except for the Scriptures. I still have almost 6,500 resources, because we should not be ignorant of the enemy's devices. You disagree with RC?? Then READ RC stuff, and know that you do...or maybe don't. Worrying about what the blind, ignorant, and lazy might become contaminated with is pointless...they are already contaminated with blindness, ignorance, and laziness. You CAN'T combat those things with warning lables or "must read" or "can't read" lists. That's impossible. I share (to some degree) your distaste for certain dogmas, but if your battle isn't Bible-based, it is near about pointless. Just remember, you can't change a leopard's spots any more than it can...and insisting on trying is stupid. To do so risks becoming as inbalanced as those things you condemn.
Hi David,
This Thread is kind of running under 3 Threads, and I think your comments were made without taking this into account.
Please read all of these too:
http://community.logos.com/forums/t/65414.aspx
Title (warning label request)http://community.logos.com/forums/t/65465.aspx
Title (warning label solution)0 -
David Ames said:
What if we had a chart:
Hi David,
I like the suggestion of making 'Catholic, Baptist etc' WorkSpace(s) if that is what you mean.
However you sugesstion does not account for the fact that Verbum is Logos Re badged rebranded, and highjacks the purpose of a 'non-denominational' software program.
Do you acknowledge this?
Just for easy reference I re post:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
People in this thread continually and
on purpose are trying to down play this - changing the subject to "but their are libraries for other denominations"The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.
Solution Proposal 1:
-
offer base packages by
Denomination ( of which only a “catholic” advertised one has
been made at the moment TBA for others) -
remove Verbum advertising and
concept. Which is catholic re-badge of a non-denominational
software product.
Solution Proposal 2:
IE all denominations are treated the
same. Verbum breaks this model.Im not arguing that there should be no
catholic versions of base packages.I am arguing:
1. only catholics get to create their
own versions of base packages2. only catholics get to rebrand logos
to Verbum . (and advertise it as "logos for Catholics")-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus highjacking the purpose of a 'non-denominational program' by re-advertising it as Catholic.
0 -
-
Dan Francis said:Luigi Sam said:Catholics dont want to support a non-denominational product (Logos for all) with Catholic libraries available.
Catholics require a Catholic version of Logos called Verbum.Verbum is basically catholic Libraries, and as I have said it is more about making things easier with the treatment of Bible using the historical Alexandrian Canon of scriptures verses the traditional Hebrew Canon. When there was an option in a beta version I remember many people complaining about it. By offering Verbum people wanting little to do with what they consider worthless books are happy and people who value the deutocanonical books can be made happy. Catholics were happy with catholic Libraries it was the non- catholics throwing up a fuss.
-Dan
Hi Dan,
Dan Francis said:Verbum is basically catholic Libraries
You got it. For the most part it is base packages redesigned with catholic libraries.
I dont oppose catholic libaries, nor Logos creating base packages according to a fair selection of denominational groups.
I oppose Logos being rebranded Verbum, which is highjacking a what is supposed to be a software product designed all denominations. You cant just relabel it Verbum and advertise it specifically to any one denomination.
Consider:
Davar (or Dabar) | Hebrew | The Word
Logos | Greek | The Word
Verbum | Latin | The Word.
- Do only Jewish people have the rights to a Logos rebrand if we call it Davar?
- Do Protestants or any other NAMED DENOMINATION have the right to advertise Logos as thiers?
- Why do Catholics get to highjack Logos and re advertise it as a software program "for Catholics"?
0 -
Fr. Charles R. Matheny said:
Good Grief guy.
Hi Charles,
- Does this mean you disagree with my issue? or,
- Does this mean you are posting just to try to undermine a valid concern?
Please try to give reasons, and try to address the issue I am raising in context.
A forum facilitates user discussing topics by expressing themselves with valid reasons.
By now you should know precisely the concern I am raising if you have been following this Thread.
Thanks.
0 -
Luigi Sam,
I wish I knew how to convince you that you are hurting your cause. Assuming that you really wish to convince Logos and users that your plan is worth considering, you need to follow the path of others who have been successful. This includes using a single thread in any 3 month period; making it clear in your responses that you have listened, understood and taken into account other views; use examples that show how it benefits a major group of users in Bible Study (not theology) ...
A recent thread uncovered a factual error in a resource re: Jesus speaking on hell. I'd love to have the author tagged with "doesn't check his facts". There is a book I reviewed an advance copy of on Amazon that contains the worst logic in terms of filling the book with irrelevant popular culture lists as pseudo-support. But I know if Logos were to tag the books, the relationship with the publishers would tank.
May I suggest an option that would provide the you desire without causing distress with users or publishers? Logos produced reading list for all the books in the "protestant" canon. What if Logos:
- created a topic/reading list entry for each author included in Logos
- include in that record a link to the Wikipedia article on the author, if any
- include a link to the academic position or church position currently held by the author
- include a bibliography of all the works of the author with links for resources in Logos
- include links to Logos resources that include biographical information
- users could add references about the author
Then Logos users browsing the offerings would have a single place to go to learn about the author. If someone particularly enjoyed an author, they could see what else they might enjoy.
This is something that we as users could create even if Logos declined to use resources for the project. I would be quite willing to build a template from which people could build the entries for their favorite (or most hated) authors. An example: Dave Armstrong - warning Catholic apologist.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Hi MJ,
thanks for posting,
- I am a little confused on what you are replying on in regards to your dot point issues however?
- I have acknowledged many posts, and tried to keep in on track when they seem to change the topic or deviate from the issue I started the thread for ( and i have progressively refined and reduced the issue down to).
- I point out that some of my original threads got blocked, and then unblocked, that is why there are 3 threads. also two of them (the warning label request and solution ones were not meant to be discussed here, but unfortunately it got intertwined.
- people might be posting without reading the whole of this thread - and want to give their opinion or story on things not on topic (if people search for and read all of my individual posts in this thread).
To keep it on track, could we all try to post directly about my post as I summarize below.
as I am trying to round this thread up to exclusively raise that issue.
So thanks MJ, in response to your point on keeping things on topic:
**********************
To everyone on this thread, please keep the replies strictly to the issue being raised as follows:
**********************
Quoted here just so there is no mistake:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
People in this thread continually and
on purpose are trying to down play this - changing the subject to "but their are libraries for other denominations"The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.
Solution Proposal 1:
-
offer base packages by
Denomination ( of which only a “catholic” advertised one has
been made at the moment TBA for others) -
remove Verbum advertising and
concept. Which is catholic re-badge of a non-denominational
software product.
Solution Proposal 2:
IE all denominations are treated the
same. Verbum breaks this model.Im not arguing that there should be no
catholic versions of base packages.I am arguing:
1. only catholics get to create their
own versions of base packages2. only catholics get to rebrand logos
to Verbum . (and advertise it as "logos for Catholics")-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus highjacking the purpose of a 'non-denominational program' by re-advertising it as Catholic.
0 -
I dont oppose catholic libaries, nor Logos creating base packages according to a fair selection of denominational groups.
I oppose Logos being rebranded Verbum, which is highjacking a what is
supposed to be a software product designed all denominations. You cant
just relabel it Verbum and advertise it specifically to any one
denomination.Consider:
Davar (or Dabar) | Hebrew | The Word
Logos | Greek | The Word
Verbum | Latin | The Word.
- Do only Jewish people have the rights to a Logos rebrand if we call it Davar?
- Do Protestants or any other NAMED DENOMINATION have the right to advertise Logos as thiers?
- Why do Catholics get to highjack Logos and re advertise it as a software program "for Catholics"?
0 -
If others are interested in an alternative solution which is practical, please do not respond in this thread. I will start a new thread.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
If others are interested in an alternative solution which is practical, please do not respond in this thread. I will start a new thread.
- what do you mean an alternative solution in a different thread?
- does your alternative solution address my issues?
if it does, then it should be here.
but if you are changing the issues which are that about rebadging Logos and advertising the Logos Platform as Catholic software? (verbum)
then what is the point of a new thread? or a "solution" which does not address my issues?
{ edit: ahh i see your post regards filtering by denominational groups (well alternatives to it) & I have no problems with you starting a new thread to solve them
}
0 -
Thread CLOSED - see new thread link here which is aimed at getting the issue back on track.
The topic that I want to discuss is newly posted as: ISSUE: LOGOS PLATFORM is being sold as Catholic here: link http://community.logos.com/forums/t/65685.aspx
0 -
Luigi: Forst, I have responded to you several times.
Next: I think the whole thing is ridiculas.
Next: I believe your responses now are dishonest. When you first posted ( yes, I have read them all) as distasteful as it was, you were at least honest, now, you cover your real feelings with all sorts of "straw man " arguments, thats what I think.
You whole reasoning in your first post was that Catholic materials needed warning labels because you believe them to be dangerous , especially to new believers. I responded to those posts, you did not reply.
I find the whole thing quite distasteful, just to be honest with you.
Next: You keep speaking of Logos being hijacked.
Straw man argument.
The only person /persons that could complain about something being hijacked would be the owners of what had been hijacked.
Logos is not complaining about Logos being hijacked.
Logos software is a company, they have every right to do whatever they wish with thier product.
You, as a customer have every right to buy it or, not buy it.
If you don't like the way Logos is being managed/packaged/sold , write a letter to the owner, call him, his number is listed.
I don't think you will though because the real issue you have is with Catholics and Catholic Materials. You believe they should be labeled as false doctrine, you want warning labels placed on them as if they are poison. This is why you hate Verbum, for feel Catholic is getting a leg up on protestant denominationalism through Logos. Thus, your real motivation and purpose is to do all you can to combat Catholic growth in any way you can.
In my humble opinion, this is not the place for Chick Track mentalities or discussion of same.
Again, Logos is a company, they have the freedom to market as they please.
I have no issue at all with Catholic branding, with Jewish branding, Pentecostal etc.
What we have now is two "overarching" groups represented, those two "groups" are:
1. Protestants - huge libraries to choose from, can choose to add resources from all over the Christian experience.
2. Catholic- Huge Libraries to choose from, can choose to add resources from all over the Christian experience.
1a. Logos standard has resources from all over the protestant experience and it's history, including Baptist, Pentecostal, Charismatic, Non-Denominational, generally all Evangelical disciplines.
2b. Catholic/Verbum- Libraries of resources covering/of special interest to: Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Lutheran, Anglican and other disciplines.
Note: Looks to me like Logos is simply trying to cover the known Christian market as it is normally seen , trying to meet the "needs" of those who will/would be buying thier products.
Logos is doing well to do so, Logos is looking to meet the needs of it's user base and looking to expand that user base- Good business plan.
Logos is a company , will grow or die based on it's business decisions.
No one here has a right to make those business decisions for Logos for no one here is willing to take the risks, make the investments Logos is willing to make.
Logos has many employees, they have families , those families need to pay bills, Logos has to grow in order to take care of it's employee base.
Logos has to deal with Publishers , a very, very difficult situation these days, very confused environment these days, much like Music Industry before iTunes changed everything. Logos has to respond to the Publisher environment, their needs, demands in order to get those resources, this , in all likelihood plays a major role in Logos Marketing decisions.
Logos can now, for the first time in reality, truly make a claim to being non-denominational, for not only do they have some catholic resources available in a protestant format, but they now have a catholic format, thus serving both the Evangelical/Protestant disciplines AND the Catholic Disciplines.
I have never complained about the Protestant Software and Libraries, I use them.
I am very blessed to now have the Catholic Software and Libraries.
Again Luigi: I find the whole thing distasteful , now dishonest. You don't want the catholic resources, don't buy them.
You have no use for Verbum, don't buy it.
You have all the access you want to Protestant Software and Libraries.
If Verbum is the Catholic version, then Logos Standard is the Protestant version.
Logos software "systems" is a computer platform to access and use the Logos library system.
Logos is the best way to access Evangelical Protestant library resources.
Verbum is the best way to access Catholic Library resources.
The Catholic Library system "is" somewhat different ( be better when finished ) because the tagging to catechisms/Lectionaries effects how we access materials and, catholics also have some different key-words we use in "subject" searches. We also have some different Biblical books, we often use parts of history "some" evangelicals don't use or use as often. We use a lot of Greek and Latin words/word groups/phrases that have to be tagged/accounted for that some evangelicals would have no interest in.
I could give you probably another dozen or so reasons why Verbum IS NOT just Logos "rebranded" as you like to say so often. There has to be an enormous amount of coding done in Verbum that is different that the Evangelical/Protestant version called Logos software.
Ok, you asked, you have my answer.
Personally think I/we should all just quit responding to these threads because the real and core issue is your being Anti-Catholic , wanting all Catholic materials branded with warning labels as "dangerous" and making uneducated biased statements like : catholic lay people don't read and study the Bible, don't know the faith etc. etc.
Again, I find your whole reason for all of this to be most distasteful, thus I will be praying for your enlightenment.
Hope that covers everything for you in a succinct way.
Pray you find Grace and Peace in Christ Jesus.
0 -
The Issue:
This thread is to raise the issue that the Logos platform is being advertised and sold as Catholic. (Verbum latin for "the word")
I raise this issue as it seems to contradict the purpose of the Logos platform being 'non-denominational'.
While It is true that the Logos platform supplies Libraries for each
denomination, and Logos can offer base packages customized to a
denomination.However Verbum re-labels and advertises the Logos Platform as
Catholic software "for Catholics".The Logos sales model is frequently outlined to be a
non-denominational software product that offers titles and libraries for
all denominations. Why then do catholics get the whole Logos Software
Platform rebadeged and advertised for them?Im not arguing:
- I don't oppose catholic libraries, nor Logos creating base packages according to a fair selection of denominational groups.
I am arguing:
- Only Catholics get to re-brand and resell the Logos Platform as Catholic (Verbum) .
- Thus highjacking the purpose of a 'non-denominational program' by re-advertising it as Catholic.
Therefore:
I oppose Logos being re-branded as Verbum, which is highjacking a what is
supposed to be a software product designed all denominations. Surely you cant
just relabel it Verbum and advertise it specifically to any one
denomination and say that Logos can maintain its stance that it is a "non-denominational" platformConsider:
Davar (or Dabar) | Hebrew | The Word
Logos | Greek | The Word
Verbum | Latin | The Word.
- Is Logos going to sell the Logos Platform as Davar and advertise it explicitly as Jewish Software?
- Do Protestants or any other NAMED DENOMINATION have the right to
advertise Logos as theirs exclusively (ie Logos is not named Logos for
Protestants)? - Why do Catholics get to highjack the Logos Platform ( which is
non-denominational) and re advertise it as a software program "for
Catholics"?
Solution Proposal 1:
-
offer base packages by
Denomination ( of which only a “catholic” advertised one has
been made at the moment TBA for others) -
remove Verbum advertising and
concept. Which is catholic re-badge of a non-denominational
software product.
Solution Proposal 2:
IE all denominations are treated the
same. Verbum breaks this model.
Another Solution would be:
1. remove Verbum, but offer Catholic base packages, and Catholic WorkSpace Layouts.
This also places the Logos platform back as a 'non-denominational' software platform.
Luigi Sam said:*************************************************
Thread CLOSED - see new thread link here which is aimed at getting the issue back on track.
The topic that I want to discuss is newly posted as: ISSUE: LOGOS PLATFORM is being sold as Catholic here: link http://community.logos.com/forums/t/65685.aspx
0 -
Thread CLOSED - see new thread link here which is aimed at getting the issue back on track.
The topic that I want to discuss is newly posted as: ISSUE: LOGOS PLATFORM is being sold as Catholic here: link http://community.logos.com/forums/t/65685.aspx
0 -
Sorry, I only just noticed this. No I I am no trying to be clever. Most Christians would agree that Catholic is
is not based on the Bible. So Catholic books in logos should be clearly marked as such.
0 -
phil stilliard said:
Sorry, I only just noticed this. No I I am no trying to be clever. Most Christians would agree that Catholic is
is not based on the Bible. So Catholic books in logos should be clearly marked as such.
All I can say is that I disagree.
And to let you know, there are plenty of Roman Catholic Christians who use this forum.
0