Warning Label Request:

2

Comments

  • Michael March
    Michael March Member Posts: 237 ✭✭

    Room4more said:

    So, Are they or are they NOT labeled? are we talking the same definitional language here....

    Perhaps we are not speaking of the same thing (and my post was a bit on the flippant side, I apologize).  

    When he says they are labelled, I believe he's talking about title, description, author, publisher, etc. from which you can find out all you need to know about a book.

    For instance, I got an email from logos on a releasing title on a commentary that I thought I might be interested in.  I looked at the description which gave some detail about the resource, but it was still unclear to me from whence the author came and consequently whether I wanted to shell out that much money (most descriptions ARE designed to sell the product, after all).  So I did a search on the internet for more information on the book and the author and was able to determine that while it might be good, it was too pricey for me given the particular theological persuasion of the author.  So I passed.  I was able to do enough research on my own to determine whether or not the book suited me without being told directly whose denomination and/or theological tradition the author came from.  Even though he was not from my tradition, I likely would have bought it anyway except Logos wanted too much money for me.  

    On the other hand, I did buy the second verbum collection from the top (can't remember the name) because I wanted the resources.  I am a Presbyterian but I appreciate good scholarship from RC sources as well as many other traditions.  In the end, I can decide for myself whether a particular book is worth the money if given the title, the description, the author, the publisher, and the internet.

    Does that help?

    Windows PC - Android Phone - Surface Pro 4

  • George Somsel
    George Somsel Member Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭

    Room4more said:

    So, Are they or are they NOT labeled? are we talking the same definitional language here.....

    What's the meaning of the word "is"?  [;)]

    george
    gfsomsel

    יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

  • Thanks for chiming in Bob, and congratulate on your 1,000 post. Keep it up and soon you will catch Dave up. [:D]

    Mission: To serve God as He desires.

  • Room4more
    Room4more Member Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭


    Room4more said:

    So, Are they or are they NOT labeled? are we talking the same definitional language here.....

    What's the meaning of the word "is"?  Wink


    opposite of "isn't"......

    DISCLAIMER: What you do on YOUR computer is your doing.

  • Matthew C Jones
    Matthew C Jones Member Posts: 10,295 ✭✭✭

    I appreciate good scholarship from RC sources as well as many other traditions.  In the end, I can decide for myself whether a particular book is worth the money

    What do we have to do to get Archbishop Fulton J Sheen in Logos?  Warning label or no, I would have Sheen's works prioritized. [8-|]

    Logos 7 Collectors Edition

  • Michael March
    Michael March Member Posts: 237 ✭✭

    Windows PC - Android Phone - Surface Pro 4

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    Hi Bob,

    I realize that if you take this issue to heart it may put you in a spiritual dilemma. I sympathize with you because if this issue does strike a spiritual nerve, then it might require resolutions that you might find hard to carry out.  All I can do is reply in sincerity, with this appeal in summary.

    I am not condemning you if you do or ever have made business decisions which might be such that your conscience convicts you about it.

    I acknowledge your efforts as a Christian trying to run a fair business with integrity, that just happens to be a Christian related software business that is trying to be non-denominational.

    People will get behind you and support you if you have to make business decisions which are costly in order to do what is right. Assuredly, even if you had to start from scratch you'd be better off not ignoring the prompts that (if) God puts on your conscience regarding dicey justification of the issues i am raising (ie justifiable in your mind so long as you don't think about it for too long) or any other issues that ( or if/when) God raises with you.

     

    Regards.

     

    Each of these labels, while never as precise as some people may want, is a useful indication of the book's content and slant. "Publisher" is going to do a good job of telling you 'what denomination/perspective will find this acceptable,' and when the publisher is too broad or unknown, you still have the author's name you can look up.

     

    • try filtering your search results by manually checking each books title page.   ( i would like to filter my results - isn't this what software is for - doing research which is too laborious / time costly / computationally impossible to do by hand? )

     

    Verbum was created for practical reasons in response to feedback from both Catholic and protestant users

    do Protestant users get to advertise Logos as Protestant like Catholics get to do for Verbum?

     

    THE PROBLEM:

     

    image

    People in this thread continually and
    on purpose are trying to down play this -
    changing the subject to "but their are libraries for other denominations"

     

     

    The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.

    image

    IE all denominations are treated the
    same. Verbum breaks this model.

     

     

    Im not arguing that there should be no
    catholic versions of base packages.

    I am arguing:

    1. only catholics get to create their
    own versions of base packages

    2. only catholics get to rebrand logos
    to Verbum . (and advertise it as "logos for Catholics")

     


    THE SOLUTION (SUGGESTIONS)

     

    Solution Proposal 1:

    • offer base packages by
      Denomination ( of which only a “catholic” advertised one has
      been made at the moment TBA for others)

    • remove Verbum advertising and
      concept. Which is catholic re-badge of a non-denominational
      software product.

     

     

    Solution Proposal 2:

    image

     

  • Andrew Blye
    Andrew Blye Member Posts: 33 ✭✭

    Yes, please put warning labels on all Calvinist books, because as an Armenian, I just can't handle any theology that differs from my own. :/ LOL

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    Yes, please put warning labels on all Calvinist books, because as an Armenian, I just can't handle any theology that differs from my own. :/ LOL

    Hi Andrew,

    you response might be better aimed at my last post in http://community.logos.com/forums/p/65465/458250.aspx#458250 which explains my goal as such and shows your post as not applicable ( and your post was not even applicable to the warning label reasons at the start if this Thread either btw. ).

    Research involves progressively expanding into new areas in an orderly fashion.

    Learning involves progressively expanding into new areas in an orderly fashion.

    Expanding into new topics, and mastering the knowledge of a topic that they remain a babe therein, and employing new methods to research a topic like progressively comparing what other denominations think, learning to be impartial to learning a topic ( which is maturity by experience of judging a case and coming to a conclusion based on the evidence alone and having the ability to reduce the case down to the facts to get that conclusion.) Not to mention the techniques of reasoning out a case that get better with time and experience that learning a topic in an impartial manner brings.)    However Research should be orderly, and on topics that God either puts on the heart immediately, and those topics which God puts on our heart through systematic reading of the Bible. and the depth a progressively growing Christian learns should be the amount that he is able to learn, regardless of if he has to be in a state of not having the answer fully and maturely answered. God will prompt the Christian when more searching is needed, and perhaps some questions will only be answered after reading the whole bible through two or three times. ( you aren't mature, and you haven't mastered a topic until you undertake research. ) And the only thing a pastor, or church or the like can do is guide the child to be as mature as they can.  They are not there to say "they dont need maturity", and they are not there to deny the Christian of food for the topic God has placed on them to learn about, and you cant scare people away by saying " but it might be dangerous if you learn about that topic ".  No we all hit puberty, and we all mature by fumbling childish life, with guides to best direct us - and by Gods grace we slowly learn by our guides, their proposed techniques to maturing (not techniques to staying in a diaper, nor how to continue sucking the breast for life). Each person is responsible to mature as fully as is possible to stand on their own two feet of maturity in the faith.  Elders are Guides allow us to progressively expand into maturity by equipping us to learn a topic in an orderly fashion by systematic, helpful, and progressive learning ( which includes allowing comparisons to be made between denominations, and finding out why).

     

     

    New Christians desire the sincere milk of the word so that they might grow thereby. (the scriptures is a primary source for new Christians)

    they progressively get to a stage they can handle the meat of the word.

    during both of these stages the 'aids' change to meet the level of research that the Christian is at.

    at any stage a Christian might want to compare what the bible says to what my denominations materials say, to what others say depending on the question that is on the mind of the believer.

    Recommending rounding down the works to ones of a denomination to appease a gentle mind for a new Christian who is apt to research and equiping them to discern that comparisons can be made based on denomination of any one topic surely doesn't deserve being mocked?

     

    I am persuaded that it is a systematic and orderly approach.

  • Andrew Blye
    Andrew Blye Member Posts: 33 ✭✭

    Please take no offense. I was merely speaking in jest regarding the absurdity of putting "warning" labels on certain books, as if they are something to be avoided for certain folks.

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    thats ok. No problem. thanks for posting back.

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    Hi Bob,

    Just so you know, I am kind of checking back here awaiting your response if it is still ok to address you in this thread. (and I think another nice person asked you a Q too).

    Im just bumping this so that it might become apparent that I thought this thread was not really solved yet and thus hasn't really run its full course. Also I think that your response is likely to be the only one that can aid in it becoming closed.

    Thanks for your time, and please feel free to respond in your own time - I'm not trying to be put you on the spot.

    I guess after that you could lock this thread if it seems good in your eyes?

     

    Thanks

  • Matthew C Jones
    Matthew C Jones Member Posts: 10,295 ✭✭✭

    Luigi Sam said:

    Hi Bob,

    Just so you know, I am kind of checking back here awaiting your response

     

    I've been asked to step in and post something here.... so:

    We're not attaching warning or even denominational labels to our books.

    Kinda clear to me. [^o)]

     

    Logos 7 Collectors Edition

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    however that is not the whole issue that was addressed, nor did the whole issue get properly addressed regarding a Highjacking of Logos (non-denominational software) and rebranding it Verbum ( software advertised explicitly as Catholic).  

     

    I believe Bob might have replied without fully being briefed on this part , because his post was not addressing it with the wording of someone that knew the full concern.

     

    If he replies saying he read my reply to him on this thread and that he was addressing all my concerns (as my letter to him outlines), then I will be at ease that he made that post in fully knowledge of all of my concerns.

  • Bradley Grainger (Logos)
    Bradley Grainger (Logos) Administrator, Logos Employee Posts: 12,111

    Luigi Sam said:

    however that is not the whole issue that was addressed, nor did the whole issue get properly addressed regarding a Highjacking of Logos (non-denominational software) and rebranding it Verbum ( software advertised explicitly as Catholic).  

    I believe Bob is traveling on business right now, and may not have had opportunity to read all the recent posts on the forums. However, to make sure you felt your concerns were being heard, I wanted to reply to you.

    I've read your other posts and I think I'm right in assuming that your primary concern boils down to this quote I've excerpted from this thread: http://community.logos.com/forums/p/65414/458248.aspx#458248


    Luigi Sam said:

    The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.

    IE all denominations are treated the same. Verbum breaks this model.

    That is, you believe it should not be the case that one denomination is treated specially in the Logos product lineup, especially with a custom-branded product. If that is indeed the case, I can make sure Bob is aware of this the next time I see him.

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    Luigi Sam said:

    however that is not the whole issue that was addressed, nor did the whole issue get properly addressed regarding a Highjacking of Logos (non-denominational software) and rebranding it Verbum ( software advertised explicitly as Catholic).  

    I believe Bob is traveling on business right now, and may not have had opportunity to read all the recent posts on the forums. However, to make sure you felt your concerns were being heard, I wanted to reply to you.

    I've read your other posts and I think I'm right in assuming that your primary concern boils down to this quote I've excerpted from this thread: http://community.logos.com/forums/p/65414/458248.aspx#458248

     

    Luigi Sam said:

    The ORIGINAL Logos Model IS Non-denominational.

    IE all denominations are treated the same. Verbum breaks this model.


    That is, you believe it should not be the case that one denomination is treated specially in the Logos product lineup, especially with a custom-branded product. If that is indeed the case, I can make sure Bob is aware of this the next time I see him.

     

     

    Hi Bradley,

    Thank you kindly for replying.  

    Yes in summary. But could you also foward this diagram too? As it illustrates a solution that might be fair and as less disruptive as possible. ( that is, it is a suggestion from my point of view of what I see as fair ).  I just made this diagram to be helpful because I dont really want to point out problems and then not help in making solutions.

    Thanks again I appreciate it.

     

    image

     

  • Room4more
    Room4more Member Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭

    Hmmm….. I have followed what I suspect are 3 [possibly four] different threads concerning this “Lable-ing” issue.

    I believe that I can honestly say that Luigi has not really down his homework. In that, there are varying denominations that use the Logos software, some have voiced their thoughts on the varying threads allready, I believe that if Luigi was really paying attention that Luigi would have noticed this. But yet Luigi persists, I can admire the persistence. But now it seems to be becoming redundant, IMHO.[even with Bob's input]

    Just my $1.50$[if the shoe doesn't fit, try another style..../?]

    DISCLAIMER: What you do on YOUR computer is your doing.

  • Fr. Charles R. Matheny
    Fr. Charles R. Matheny Member Posts: 757 ✭✭

     Effort at Explanation:

    Dear Luigi: The reason some of us get upset by the things you propose is quite simply because they are counter productive.

    First, Logos/Verbum is not as different as you think. It's simply a switch that allows the software to use some different tagging to enable use of some different specific resource tools.

    I am set up with Logos, I type in "set Verbum to yes" and, my tool set changes. Pretty simple. I can also set it back the other way.

    Ok, now here is the part that bothers me and, I think, many others.

    People need to be well read Luigi. Gone ( for the most part ) are the days of putting denominational blinders on and knowing nothing Biblically beyond the point of what a particular Pastor brings to the people within denomination.

    People need to be well read, people need to study well, people are doing studies at a much higher level and, rate than in times past. There is today, much more information available to the average Bible student than ever before. Lay folk are today reading and studying resources that in times past, only seminarians and pastors with large book budgets had access to.

    I have been studying the Biblical text for a long, long time Luigi and, I have to say, I still resent my earliest Teachers depriving me of materials and influence of much of Christianity. One only has so many hours to live and to have a teacher/Pastor deprive students of much of Biblical History/Theology/Christology/Soteriology/Eschatology etc. is just horrible and hateful. ( Many do so, not from ill will, but from Ignorance because they too were deprived of certain things/teachings etc. People do what they do, because they know what they know).

    I have a pretty large physical Library Luigi, most of which I keep at the Church, but another large section at home ( mostly comprised of whats been read/studied in the last few years, books get moved back and forth, space is an issue etc.

    My Library is open to all, it is there to be used.

    Someone will come to me with a book and ask: Is this a good one?

    Well, sure I say: However, this one is an Academic book, so it may be difficult reading, or, yes, but the other has some issues here, or there, or this one is very dogmatic about this, or that, or this one was before many of the archeological discoveries we now know about etc. etc.

    Even books I don't like, even books that have horrible wrongs in them, usually have something of value as well, even it if that value is to see how things can go horribly wrong, that too is of value. My biggest issue is with "fluff and stuff", books written just to make a buck-smile.

    My point is simple, Logos is a Library , with a Library system, some tools like Verbum help us to use some specific resources , thats all.

    People need to be well read, people need to read the Patristics, History, Jewish works, lifestyles in history, people need to read the Classics, study Archeology , Look at timelines that don't have things edited out by denominational bent.

    To edit out parts of the Jewish /Christian historical story is academically dishonest and is an attempt edit the work of the Holy Spirit, for God has been at work in all of Jewish/Christian history and is today as well.

    Luigi: Human beings are the only creatures in all of creation that can hand down information/knowledge generationally, the only creatures that can do this, at all. Thus we have the sciences, we have modern medicine,Surgical procedures, technology, interplanetary exploration, Archeological discoveries , deep sea research, psychology, etc, etc, etc. We are the only creatures created by God than can do these things. We have music and art. Birds may make a wonderful sound outside you windows in the spring, but you will never see them gathered there with music stands and one directing them with a baton to play Mozart. You will never see the lower animals cresting special places to study paintings made hundreds of years ago by their own kind, they just do not have that ability.

    We are specially, fearfully and wonderfully made. We have the things I have mentioned because we are special and can hand on knowledge generation by generation, each one building on the work of the past generation. To do so, we must work from success and failure, failure to success. We all stand on the shoulders of those that have gone before us, shoulders that did well, and shoulders that did not do well, but all of it is part of what we have today and who we are today. It is important to be well read, well studied. No Emergency room Dr. has simply studied what other Dr.s have done well-No- They have also studied the failures that went into learning how to do things well, so that lives are saved, where in the past, they were lost. Human's succeeding in things is directly connected to understanding their mistakes, embracing those mistakes to understand them , and moving forward in the process of Learning.

    Personal Lessons:

    When I was a much younger man, I had a very successful ministry, full of life, lots of money, well respected in the community, people of power and wealth sought me out, it was, in many ways, wonderful. When I spoke, people listened, when they spoke of me, it was with accolades .

    But I had more questions, there were things I wanted to understand better and in my quest for those answers I found a very well known Theologian of English decent that took a liking to me and I him.

    Long story short, after a few years, I left the Ministry I had behind to study under this man, for him to be my spiritual director. The reason: My denomination didn't like some of the things I was studying, did not like some of my questions and answers to those questions. Again, I was well known in my denomination, an "up and comer ", a mover and shaker". Asked to speak all over the place etc. etc.etc. 

    I was misunderstood, reviled, called names not pleasing, no longer sought after, no longer invited, my opinions no longer wanted, I was the disappointment of the community. Yet I knew I was right, I had prayed a lot, this was my path.

    Packed up family and off we went.

    As I was sitting with this man one morning over coffee I mentioned I did not understand how Monks could be such cowards.

    Oh really! he says ( heavy english accent ), please, tell me more. So I explained they left the great commission , they left service, as we worked hard to teach and preach, to care for the least, the lost, the lonely, they just hid from the world and it's problems to care for themselves.

    "Bloody well" he says, we will speak more at another time, and off we went about our day.

    Next morning he gave me a map with driving instructions and told me I was to go there for a few days, further education he says. It was not a request and- off I went.

    You guessed it by now, It was a Monastery !

    Aggghhh!

    Resentfully, but dutifully, I went in.

    My ignorance became apparent to me in less than 48 hours and, the experience has stayed with me to this day and will for the rest of my life- now part of a semi-monastic community. It was life changing .

     

    Another morning, I made a statement about the Mother of our Lord and how Roman Catholic's wrongfully dealt with her.

    Oh Really ! he says again ( heavy english accent ), and what pray tell do you base your opinion in? he asks?

    I tell him ( knew I was lost at "Oh Really) and he just smiles.

    Next morning: I am given the assignment to spend all of my time for the next 30 days researching everything I can find in history and theology on the Blessed Virgin Mary, across all Christian disciplines.

    Oh my Lord!

    We do not speak of it again till I have done my task.

    He asks: What have you learned.

    My answer: That I am an ignorant man and quite arrogant about it!

    He smiles: Ahh, less so now my young friend, much less so, now.

    Here is the point Luigi: There is much to learn, much we do not know , much to understand , great works by incredible christians over thousands of years. God Himself being at work in all of it, the good and the bad, the right, and the wrong. We have to have all of it to be who we are, we stand on the shoulders of all of them, the good and the bad, the right and the wrong. We try pulling those things out, we harm our own balance and, we start being our own god by deciding where the True God was and was not at work. The Old Testament and Prophets teach us this is a commonly made mistake.

    He made me start reading the Church Fathers ( Fathers-yuk, old dead people who failed-yuk)

    Boy was I surprised! Saint Polycarp blew me away man! St. Justin the Martyr knocked my socks off. ( If you have not read "Dialogue with a Jew" , Man, you have to read this, it's incredible! No theological Library, None of the tools we have, no bible in his knapsack, and just blows it up, it's that good! The first written Apologist in my opinion ).

    This great men, some who studied under the Apostles themselves, just blew me away!

    Point: My teachers from before had kept a great deal of the Faith from me, willingly by some, through ignorance by others, but no matter how, years of good study's had been stolen from me.

    We should not do so, we should encourage everyone to be well read, study all we can, as much as we can, whenever and however we can.

    Verbum is just a tool, a switch to better allow us to engage Latin Texts and other resources with specific taggings.

    It is not about advocating the Roman Church or any other Church or group, it is about accessing materials, it is about learning, it is about putting ignorance to bed. Logos is not trying to grow the Roman Church, they are providing "all of us" tools we "all" need in order for "all" of us to be better students of what God has been, and is doing.

    I "think" this is why some of us get a little irritated by all this, something within us " just knows" , just knows that more fences and labels to keep people at bay is just wrong. Perhaps it is the Holy Spirit that makes us uncomfortable with these things, perhaps it is experience.

    As an older man to one who is younger and, who see's a little of my younger self in you, please do not be offended.

    I love your passion, understand your idealism , but can honestly say: There is much you have yet to learn and, I am so excited for your journey into learning and seeing the things you have yet to learn and see.

    I urge all of the spiritual children under my care to:  read, study, learn, "think" and most of all, in order to do those things well : ask questions, find all the great questions, then the answers will become readily apparent. 

    It is apparent to all Luigi that you have a wonderful mind, good soil that can bring forth a great harvest. Thus I have shared  with you that was given to me by my Spiritual Director, though I cannot do so in the same manner.

    Find that point where you can see your yourself, as you are, then many things will open to you. Spend your time on this, not on fighting with Logos.

    For me, it was finding out I really knew so very little, while thinking I knew so very much., That in my former position of being so well thought of, I had become arrogant in my knowledge, which only served to blind me to my own ignorance.

    I am still studying today Luigi and, I can honestly say, after all these many, many years:

    What I do not know, is still far greater than what I do know.

    All the great questions I have found answer's for, have simply given me the joy of far greater and more wonderful questions.

    How logos markets it's products is not one of the great questions of life and, is certainly not a worthy subject for one who is called to study the great Mysteries of God.

    Blessings of Grace and Peace Luigi, Blessings of Grace and Peace.

     

  • DMB
    DMB Member Posts: 14,363 ✭✭✭✭

    Chuck ... you're appeal to 'we' to not respond to these threads won't work well, if you're doing the responding.  Need to get on board with the other 'we's'.

    "If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.

  • Sleiman
    Sleiman Member Posts: 672 ✭✭

    Fr Charles, thank you for the wonderfully written post. You just made my day!! [:D]

    Even books I don't like, even books that have horrible wrongs in them, usually have something of value as well, even it if that value is to see how things can go horribly wrong, that too is of value

    Replace the word 'books' by 'forum posts' in your quote above, this would apply well to this thread! And the value of wisdom in your recent post outweighs all the poisonous rants I read.

    I initially vowed to not share in feeding the trolls as they say, but after reading this I couldn't help but to let you know that I thank God and the Holy Spirit for moving you to share your amazing story with us and thank you for that!

    EDIT: Having said that, now I will now also join the 'we' as DMB suggested.

  • NB.Mick
    NB.Mick MVP Posts: 16,210

    Sleiman said:

    Fr Charles, thank you for the wonderfully written post. You just made my day!! Big Smile

    Even books I don't like, even books that have horrible wrongs in them, usually have something of value as well, even it if that value is to see how things can go horribly wrong, that too is of value

    Replace the word 'books' by 'forum posts' in your quote above, this would apply well to this thread! And the value of wisdom in your recent post outweighs all the poisonous rants I read.

    [Y]

    Sleiman said:

    I initially vowed to not share in feeding the trolls as they say, but after reading this I couldn't help but to let you know that I thank God and the Holy Spirit for moving you to share your amazing story with us and thank you for that!

    You put it very well, Sleiman, I'm with you on this. Thanks a lot, Fr. Charles!

    Sleiman said:

    EDIT: Having said that, now I will now also join the 'we' as DMB suggested.

    Going back to the "we"s,

    Mick

    Have joy in the Lord! Smile

  • Fr. Charles R. Matheny
    Fr. Charles R. Matheny Member Posts: 757 ✭✭

    DMB: You are correct. However, I woke up feeling somewhat badly for not explaining why I feel the way I do to Luigi.

    I felt he should have a better explanation than I had given in the past and, I have been a bit tough on him because of the first reasons for his starting all of this, which I also believe to still be the true reasons for all of his posts, though he has modified somewhat.

    So, consider this the post I should have put up earlier.

    I am not wanting to continue any of this threads primary subject matter, yet, would like to see him leave it, for better reasons, not worse ones.

    Again, You are absolutely correct .

  • Anthony H
    Anthony H Member Posts: 1,155 ✭✭

     

    [Y] Thanks Fr. Charles R. Matheny [Y]

    Well said!

     

  • George Somsel
    George Somsel Member Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭

    Effort at Explanation

    I actually read everything you wrote.  When faced with an excessively long post, I normally read a sentence here and there to get the flavor, but your's was interesting enough and meaningful enough that I can't believe I read the whole thing (Remember the TV ad from years ago with the line "I can't believe I ate the whole thing"?).  [:D]

    george
    gfsomsel

    יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

  • Jack Caviness
    Jack Caviness MVP Posts: 13,603

    I actually read everything you wrote.  When faced with an excessively long post, I normally read a sentence here and there to get the flavor, but your's was interesting enough and meaningful enough that I can't believe I read the whole thing (Remember the TV ad from years ago with the line "I can't believe I ate the whole thing"?). 

    I also read the whole thing, every word. Thank you Fr. Charles. [Y]

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,946

    Effort at Explanation:

    Very well said - the wisdom of the ages lives on in those willing to learn it.






    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • Rosie Perera
    Rosie Perera Member Posts: 26,194 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Effort at Explanation:

    I am awed and humbled by your expression of love, Fr. Charles. I know I have been nowhere near as patient with Luigi as you have. Bless you for your wonderful example and excellent words.

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    People need to be well read Luigi. Gone ( for the most part ) are the days of putting denominational blinders on and knowing nothing Biblically beyond the point of what a particular Pastor brings to the people within denomination.

     

    Hi Charles,

    I refer you to my post in this thread as follows:

    Luigi Sam said:

    Yes, please put warning labels on all Calvinist books, because as an
    Armenian, I just can't handle any theology that differs from my own. :/
    LOL

    Hi Andrew,

    you response might be better aimed at my last post in http://community.logos.com/forums/p/65465/458250.aspx#458250
    which explains my goal as such and shows your post as not applicable (
    and your post was not even applicable to the warning label reasons at
    the start if this Thread either btw. ).

    Research involves progressively expanding into new areas in an orderly fashion.

    Learning involves progressively expanding into new areas in an orderly fashion.

    Expanding into new topics, and mastering the knowledge of a topic
    that they remain a babe therein, and employing new methods to research a
    topic like progressively comparing what other denominations think,
    learning to be impartial to learning a topic ( which is maturity by
    experience of judging a case and coming to a conclusion based on the
    evidence alone and having the ability to reduce the case down to the
    facts to get that conclusion.) Not to mention the techniques of
    reasoning out a case that get better with time and experience that
    learning a topic in an impartial manner brings.)    However Research
    should be orderly, and on topics that God either puts on the heart
    immediately, and those topics which God puts on our heart through
    systematic reading of the Bible. and the depth a progressively growing
    Christian learns should be the amount that he is able to learn,
    regardless of if he has to be in a state of not having the answer fully
    and maturely answered. God will prompt the Christian when more searching
    is needed, and perhaps some questions will only be answered after
    reading the whole bible through two or three times. ( you aren't mature,
    and you haven't mastered a topic until you undertake research. ) And
    the only thing a pastor, or church or the like can do is guide the child
    to be as mature as they can.  They are not there to say "they dont need
    maturity", and they are not there to deny the Christian of food for the
    topic God has placed on them to learn about, and you cant scare people
    away by saying " but it might be dangerous if you learn about that topic
    ".  No we all hit puberty, and we all mature by fumbling childish life,
    with guides to best direct us - and by Gods grace we slowly learn by
    our guides, their proposed techniques to maturing (not techniques to
    staying in a diaper, nor how to continue sucking the breast for life).
    Each person is responsible to mature as fully as is possible to stand on
    their own two feet of maturity in the faith.  Elders are Guides allow
    us to progressively expand into maturity by equipping us to learn a
    topic in an orderly fashion by systematic, helpful, and progressive
    learning ( which includes allowing comparisons to be made between
    denominations, and finding out why).

     

     

    New Christians desire the sincere milk of the word so that they might
    grow thereby. (the scriptures is a primary source for new Christians)

    they progressively get to a stage they can handle the meat of the word.

    during both of these stages the 'aids' change to meet the level of research that the Christian is at.

    at any stage a Christian might want to compare what the bible says to
    what my denominations materials say, to what others say depending on
    the question that is on the mind of the believer.

    Recommending rounding down the works to ones of a denomination to
    appease a gentle mind for a new Christian who is apt to research and
    equiping them to discern that comparisons can be made based on
    denomination of any one topic surely doesn't deserve being mocked?

     

    I am persuaded that it is a systematic and orderly approach.

     

  • What I do not know, is still far greater than what I do know.

    Thankful for explanation and personal insights.

    Thankful for many friendly forum discussions: have learned a lot plus have a lot to learn.  Boundaries of ignorance ever increasing.

    Thankful for Logos offering many resources so a library can be rich in diversity and heritage: much to prayerfully ponder.

    Thankful for Catholic Library Builder => http://www.logos.com/product/20503/catholic-library-builder including a fascinating conclusion:

    image

    Keep Smiling [:)]

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    Another morning, I made a statement about the Mother of our Lord and how Roman Catholic's wrongfully dealt with her.

    Oh Really ! he says again ( heavy english accent ), and what pray tell do you base your opinion in? he asks?

    I tell him ( knew I was lost at "Oh Really) and he just smiles.

    Next morning: I am given the assignment to spend all of my time for the next 30 days researching everything I can find in history and theology on the Blessed Virgin Mary, across all Christian disciplines.

    Oh my Lord!

    We do not speak of it again till I have done my task.

    He asks: What have you learned.

    My answer: That I am an ignorant man and quite arrogant about it!

    He smiles: Ahh, less so now my young friend, much less so, now.

    Hi Charles,

    I thank you for putting your heart on paper, and I appreciate this. However I too am doing this - but most people here are just abhoring me for it.

    In regards to the above story (which I just quote the above) it grinds against my being, since the Quote I gave is clear:

    The First Sentence of page 64 of "The Catechism of the Catholic Chruch in english: 1882.d_1997-08-15- SS Ioannes Paulus II - Catechismus Catholicae Ecclesiae - EN.doc is:   (downloadable from post http://community.logos.com/forums/p/65685/458940.aspx#458940

    • "   Mary benefited first of
      all and uniquely from Christ's victory over sin: she was preserved
      from all stain of original sin and by a special grace of God
      committed no sin of any kind during her whole earthly life.[306]   "

     

    1. There are no additional works that anyone needs to know about sin in order to test this against what is written in the bible on this issue: 
    • Luke 1:46-47, Romans 3:23, Romans 3:10, Romans 5:12, Galatians 3:22, Eccl 7:20, (Luke 2:21-24 Relating to Lev 12:6-8)
    • (as a group: Mark 10:18, Hebrews 7:26, 1 Peter 2.22)
    • etc.

     

    Please try not to rebut this issue when I made no effort to explain the quote I was concerned with ( in order not to breach forum guideline).


    In summary:

    if it is not my place to make a commentary about this quote, it is not your place to rebut it.

     

    but again thanks for replying with your heart on your sleeve.

    regards

  • David Ames
    David Ames Member Posts: 2,971 ✭✭✭

    Luigi Sam said:

     I am persuaded that it is a systematic and orderly approach. 

     

    Yes, it is a systematic and orderly approach BUT

    Conclusion:  The idea is Good – feed milk.  The problem is no one can define ‘milk’ for all users. [1 Pet 2:2 ] 

    I did not go back and read all of the posts but my spot checks were that the forum was saying that it could not be done.  

    And because they see it as not being able to be done they shot the suggestion down 

    They shot it down because it is impossible to do not because it was a bad suggestion

    Details: 

    There is a minor problem; Authors, Publishers, and sometimes even Churches do not label their works by denomination.  Maybe it is that each “KNOWS” that it is the one and only true way so that it is all the others that need to label their works. 

    [as in ‘we don’t have to label our works as we have the truth!’ – NOT!] 

    [[in the US putting NOT at the end shows that the preceding was false]]

    [Have seen Churches hid their true identity behind fake names to get their works read because of prejudices against the name that they are widely known by.  And have seen those works receive wide approval – until it gets rejected because of who it is by and not for what it says.  Have seen Authors write under pen names to hide their true identity.] 

    Also authors do change over time.

    In LOVE, Fr. Charles R. Matheny has reached out to you.

    He has exposed his soul so let’s use his life, hopefully in love, as an example.

    When he was young he believed and had he written would have written as an XYZ

    When he was fellowshipping, with his mentor, he would have written as an MNO

    Now in his current stage he might write as a DEF

    And, as he is still learning, he may soon write as an ABC

    [[where XYZ,  MNO,  DEF,  and ABC are some "denomination label"]]

    150 years from now, with current publishing standards – that is no publisher nor author puts labels on their own works, how will they label his life’s works?   He slowly moved from one stand to another to another and may move more.  [[as many of us do]]

    There is a work around that it seems that you have rejected.   “Collections”

    You stated “Recommending rounding down the works to ones of a denomination to appease a gentle mind for a new Christian who is apt to research and equipping them to discern that comparisons can be made based on denomination of any one topic surely doesn't deserve being mocked?”

    Now, from my point of view, you have gone from being the student that found something distasteful to the mentor that wants their student to eat milk before moving on the strong meat.  SO set your student up with collections that you build for them with you selecting what your student uses.  Take the responsibility of guiding them thought their early years.  

    But you seem to want US to label them for you.  We have tried to say not that it was not a good idea but that it cannot be done.  Not that we cannot do it but that it just cannot be done.   

    We, not me personally but many of the others, can help you select books for a given well defined denomination’s new member – sometimes.  

    BUT to do that for all resources and all denominations is just impossible.  

     

  • George Somsel
    George Somsel Member Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭

    Luigi Sam said:


    Hi Charles,

    I thank you for putting your heart on paper, and I appreciate this. However I too am doing this - but most people here are just abhoring me for it.

    I don't abhor you for it, but you have been given an answer by Bob yet you continue to drag out the issue.  Also, you have started two threads dealing with basically the same issue.  Like many others I'm getting tired of it.  We just want you to give it a rest since you have your answer.

    george
    gfsomsel

    יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    There is a work around that it seems that you have rejected.   “Collections”

    please see: http://community.logos.com/forums/t/65465.aspx

    which is: Home>Logos 5>Warning Label Solution:

     

    where I am entertaining this idea for that particular issue.

    thanks.

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,946

    Luigi Sam said:

    but most people here are just abhoring me for it.

    No, very few forums users abhor anyone. They do, however, sometimes get frustrated when communication is broken. Perhaps it is because we are all so passionate about reading scripture that we expect others to read what we have said - not what they expect us to say. I am sorry that you feel so misunderstood, just as others may feel misunderstood by you. To say more would be counterproductive. What is appropriate is to lift the injuries and frustrations up to the Lord - and leave it there.






    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • David Ames
    David Ames Member Posts: 2,971 ✭✭✭

    Luigi Sam said:

    There is a work around that it seems that you have rejected.   “Collections”

    where I am entertaining this idea for that particular issue.

    thanks.

    To follow up with what another poster commented:  When are you going to comment on the rest of my post?

    Where I agreed with you that you have a GOOD idea but stated [in different words] that it just can not be implemented except by a mentor for a student - one on one.

    [[Conclusion:  The idea is Good – feed milk.  The problem is no one can define ‘milk’ for all users. [1 Pet 2:2 ] ]]

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

     The problem is no one can define ‘milk’ for all users. [1 Pet 2:2 ] ]]

    What is milk?

    Did Peter know what 'milk was'?

    Is most of the book of Hebrews written in a way which helps define teaching in a milk like way?, and addressing milk like subjects that are applicable to the readers? Hebrews 5:11-14

    ( it is true that Hebrews has a few verses which most struggle with, but it also has some of the best milk like teaching and subjects I have read. ever! )

     

    Is milk starting from what we know to clarrify it until we are hungry again and need to know more?

    Another question might be: what do you need clarrifying in that is most concerning to your faith?

    • From this you can lay out the foundation in the bible, being careful not to impose any thing extra to the context of each passage.
    • Often times a reading of the whole bible entirely will iron out alot of questions.

     

    Maybe Milk means something different for people at different stages of maturity?

    For the most part, for a new Christian, beginning a personal study of their faith: What is Milk?

    I Propose:

    Goal:

    Read the whole bible = Milk

    As you go ask questions = Milk

    Be content to leave some questions until you have read the whole bible = Meat.

     

     

     

     

    just can not be implemented except by a mentor for a student - one on one.

     

    give me a moment: I will Edit this post once I read it.

    Now, from my point of view, you have
    gone from being the student that found something distasteful to the
    mentor that wants their student to eat milk before moving on the strong
    meat.  SO set your student up with collections that you build for them
    with you selecting what your student uses.  Take the responsibility of
    guiding them thought their early years.  

    But you seem to want US to label them
    for you.  We have tried to say not that it was not a good idea but that
    it cannot be done.  Not that we cannot do it but that it just cannot be
    done.  

    I guess you mean that part of your post.

    That is not really what I meant.  I wouldn't recommend micro managing a students Library, Nor restrict them to 'only an approved list'. 

    I did mean what you quoted from me:

    “Recommending rounding down the
    works to ones of a denomination to appease a gentle mind for a new
    Christian who is apt to research and equipping them to discern that
    comparisons can be made based on denomination of any one topic surely
    doesn't deserve being mocked?”"

     

    And that is what i meant.  Yes some works will be in a multiple denominational category and so forth. Yes sometimes writers do not necessarily represent that denomination as an authority, yes sometimes authors change their denomination. Yes there would be works that would just have to be defined as "unknown". 

    • However seeing that many works are clearly denominational or clearly define a group of denominations. Why not make the category then seeing that this is the case?
    • the Christian can still compare what other denominations teach. they aren't restricted. It is just more orderly.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Rosie Perera
    Rosie Perera Member Posts: 26,194 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Luigi Sam said:

    Yes some works will be in a multiple denominational category and so forth. Yes sometimes writers do not necessarily represent that denomination as an authority, yes sometimes authors change their denomination. Yes there would be works that would just have to be defined as "unknown". 

    • However seeing that many works are clearly denominational or clearly define a group of denominations. Why not make the category then seeing that this is the case?

    Denominational lines do not delineate what is milk and what is meat. It is not the case that someone growing up Baptist who is fed on only Baptist literature is getting only milk, nor is it the case that someone who is a new Christian in some other denomination who gets hold of some Baptist literature is going to be exposed necessarily to meat when they should still be feeding only on milk.

    Denominations are artificial boundaries made by man, based sometimes upon minuscule disputes which many years later are resolved and the denominations join up again. Dividing up what people should read at various stages of their spiritual growth based on what denomination the author was a part of, or was most influenced by, is arbitrary and not likely to be helpful.

    As David Ames pointed out, it really is better to have a mentor/student relationship, in which the mentor is a mature Christian who is widely read and aware of some good "milk" books, regardless of what denomination they may fall in (Augustine's Confessions for example, would definitely not be listed as a Baptist book, but a good Baptist mentor of a new Christian might recommend that this person read that powerful conversion story and spiritual autobiography, as it's a classic and not that difficult to understand; note that Catholics would likely claim it as their own (I see that it has the community tag "catholic"), but if one always is nervous about exposing new Protestant believers to anything with the "Catholic" label, one would miss out on this great book).

    Furthermore, many many people who are new in the faith have come to it after a lifelong search; they are exceedingly well-read in all sorts of philosophy and science and other religions, and are accustomed to tackling tough questions. If they are "protected" from such things by warning labels on their Library and are fed only pablum, they will find the Christian life to be paltry and shallow. In fact, many mature adults who surrender to Christ late in life already have read some of the stuff you'd want to keep away from them.

    God uses all sorts of things to break down people's barriers to trusting in Jesus, including writings that might not be my or your brand of orthodox Christianity. I would rather trust God to lead people by the Holy Spirit to read the right things for that particular person given his/her life background (which might not be the same as what's right for another person) than trust myself or Logos to put the right labels on resources that would steer every new Christian or inquirer towards a solid faith.

  • KJ Niblett
    KJ Niblett Member Posts: 270 ✭✭

    As a church leader (pastor), a cursory look around my office I notice some recent book purchases;

     

    Richard Dawkins - The Greatest show on Earth: the evidence for evolution

    John W Loftus - Why I became an atheist

    Alain de Botton - Religion for atheists

    Brian McLaren - A new kind of Christianity

    N.T Wright - The Climax of the Covenant

     

    All of these books have diametrically different doctrinal viewpoints, they even challenge one anothers worldviews.

     

    However reading why Loftus became an atheist, allows me to question and grow my own faith.

    Likewise de Botton allows me to see how organised and organic Christianity is percieved by non believers and then the human narratives that religion speaks loudest too.

    McLaren has some great ideas that not all church people like, some call him too liberal, others not liberal enough.....

    NT Wright's views once were maligned by the mainstream church and theologian, has now found acceptance in large parts of the Christian church.

     

    My point is;

    caveat emptor

     

    You have a brain, so you need to use it and choose what is doctrinally sound.

    In some ways Luigi you are struggling in an age of information where academically there are few absolute truths, just differing opinions.

     

    It is up to YOU to read widely and make your own opinion!

     

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    In some ways Luigi you are struggling in an age of information where academically there are few absolute truths, just differing opinions.

    mmm I understand where you are coming from, however, the point in having 'a large library' and 'powerful computational devices' is to get the most out of them. We do this by categorising to reduce the seeingly endless load of information into parts we want to read. 

    If ( for example ) I want to exclude from one of my studies all catholics writings (regardless of if portions of them absolutley align with the truth) then, I see no reason why I should not be able to do this***

    *** Note that I would likely look at the catholics writings that were on topic anyway, and if a catholic writer has a better explanation, then Kudos where due. 

    If you oppose denominational (broad grouped categories) tell me this:

    1. would you let a catholic priest come and preach on your chruch pulpit? 
    2. and if you did:
    • 2.a) would you tell him it has to be moderated ( a subject that we both agree on), and 
    • 2.b) inform your congregation that a catholic priest will be preaching this sunday.

     

    If this convicts you, then how are you saying that denominational categories are invalid or not useful?

  • Gentle reminder about Logos Bible Software forum focus => http://community.logos.com/forums/t/10072.aspx


    Phil Gons said:

    Please
    abide by the following guidelines as you interact on our forums.

    1. Please keep your discussions focused on
      Logos Bible Software: our software, products, websites, company, tools, etc.
    2. Please do not discuss or debate biblical,
      theological, or other controversial topics. Use one of the many web forums intended
      for these kinds of discussions.
    3. Please treat each other with the love,
      courtesy, respect, and kindness that you would if you were sitting in your
      living room together.
    4. Please do not use our forums to
      • sell or give away anything or link to anything you’re selling or giving away—including Logos products
      • promote
        or link to competitors
      • point
        people to other places that sell Logos-compatible products
      • advertise
        yourself, your business, your ministry, your website, etc. (a tasteful link in
        your forum signature is acceptable)
      • post Logos Coupon Codes. If you are aware of a special promotion Logos is running online, you are welcome to link directly to the promotion.
    5. Please search before posting. It’s
      likely that someone has already asked your question.
    6. Please help others follow these
      guidelines. If the problems continue after you’ve given a gentle reminder of
      these expectations, please click “Report Abuse” under “More” or send an email
      to forums@logos.com.

    Thank
    you for your cooperation. Enjoy discussing and learning about Logos Bible
    Software.

    Logos has faithlife.com for discussing wider range of topics plus opportunities for fellowship and study discussions.

    Keep Smiling [:)]

  • Randy Marsh
    Randy Marsh Member Posts: 65 ✭✭

    you are struggling in an age of information where academically there are few absolute truths, just differing opinions.

    I disagree with the entire postmodern viewpoint that everything is relative, but still, that does not mean that we have to agree on everything.  Also, while I do say that, that does not prevent me from reading books by people with other points of view.  I do read books that have other points of view on a regular basis, it does help me learn.  It also helps me to be able to talk with people who have radically different points of view than what I have, I have also occasionally changed my point of view by reading other works, or at least had some modifications to that point of view from time to time.  Reading other points of view is also part of how I became a Bible believing Christian.

  • David Thomas
    David Thomas Member Posts: 3,272 ✭✭✭

    Much of this thread could have been avoided if it had been labeled differently. If it had been titled "Denominational Label Request" I believe most users would agree that there is value in reading beyond one's denomination (I realize that labeling creates it's own challenges with understandings that change over time and individuals may not align 100% with the denominational badge they wear, if any). I now believe that Luigi has explained that he is systematic in his approach to secondary literature.

    The word "Warning" is what forced some into a defensive posture and has caused (some intended and some unintentional) harsh accusations of others within the broad spectrum of Logos users. Nobody wants to think of their beliefs as deserving of a "warning", but fewer would object to their belief system being tagged or identified.

    Making Disciples! Logos Ecosystem = LogosMax on Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Win11), Android app on tablet, FSB on iPhone & iPad mini, Proclaim (Proclaim Remote on Fire Tablet).

  • Randy Marsh
    Randy Marsh Member Posts: 65 ✭✭

    Much of this thread could have been avoided if it had been labeled differently. If it had been titled "Denominational Label Request" I believe most users would agree that there is value in reading beyond one's denomination (I realize that labeling creates it's own challenges with understandings that change over time and individuals may not align 100% with the denominational badge they wear, if any). I now believe that Luigi has explained that he is systematic in his approach to secondary literature.

    The word "Warning" is what forced some into a defensive posture and has caused (some intended and some unintentional) harsh accusations of others within the broad spectrum of Logos users. Nobody wants to think of their beliefs as deserving of a "warning", but fewer would object to their belief system being tagged or identified.

    I agree, that would have been a whole lot better and a lot less threatening to a lot of people.

     

  • Mike Childs
    Mike Childs Member Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭

    Which Christians?  Don't you know what you disagree with?


    "In all cases, the Church is to be judged by the Scripture, not the Scripture by the Church," John Wesley

  • Randy Marsh
    Randy Marsh Member Posts: 65 ✭✭

    Which Christians?  Don't you know what you disagree with?

    I used to not be a Christian.  I used to be agnostic.  I used to be into scientism, putting faith into scientific theories instead of the Gospel.

    That does not mean that I have thrown science out of the window, but I have placed my faith in Christ and in his Word, the Bible.

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    If it had been titled "Denominational Label Request"

    True. I agree.

    However to my defence I changed my stance after posting the original thread, and it didn't occur to me to change the title like that. 

    I wish you suggested it earlier : )

    Thanks all the same though.

  • Luigi Sam
    Luigi Sam Member Posts: 287 ✭✭

    " rel="nofollow">Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :) said:

    Gentle reminder about Logos Bible Software forum focus => http://community.logos.com/forums/t/10072.aspx

     

    Hi KS4J,

    I was only validating denominational categories as useful, and sensible in Logos, because denominational labels are commonly used and employed by everyone naturally on occasions.  I hope you understand.

     

    ie even the Gospels group some of the people as the "Sadducee group, and others in the Pharisee group."  it is natural, useful and responsible thing to do.

    Thanks.

  • Luigi Sam said:

    " rel="nofollow">Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :) said:

    Gentle reminder about Logos Bible Software forum focus => http://community.logos.com/forums/t/10072.aspx

    Hi KS4J,

     

    I was only validating denominational categories as useful, and sensible in Logos, because denominational labels are commonly used and employed by everyone naturally on occasions.  I hope you understand.

     

    ie even the Gospels group some of the people as the "Sadducee group, and others in the Pharisee group." it is natural, useful and responsible thing to do.

     

    Thanks.

    Reply preceding gentle reminder had "tell me this" questions that are appropriately discussed elsewhere, which now includes faithlife.com

    God immensely loves every person, regardless of denomination (and other) labels.

    My favorite Logos feature is visual filter highlighting so can "see" what God inspired; wiki has => http://wiki.logos.com/Extended_Tips_for_Highlighting_and_Visual_Filters#Examples_of_visual_filters

    image

    Keep Smiling [:)]

  • Bob Pritchett
    Bob Pritchett Member, Logos Employee Posts: 2,280

    Luigi,

    I've read all of both threads; I haven't been replying to everything because other people, including Bradley and many users, have already made every point I would make, and I don't want to encourage or continue these endless threads.

    Logos hasn't been 'hijacked' by Verbum -- Logos built Verbum. We're also building Noet.com, and a ton of other sub-brands and 'adjacent' products. (See http://logos.com/websites)

    There isn't any big master agenda or secret plan. We are simply adapting to the market and offering more resources, as we've been doing for over 20 years. The brands / sub-sites / special configurations are simply our response to what we observe and hear in the market. We have always offered stuff for many denominations, and built denomination-specific products more than 15 years ago. How we choose what gets its own box and what doesn't is simply in response to what resources we have, how segmented the market for those resources is, etc.

    Right now we sell many 'Jewish' resources that are also of interest to our Christian users interested in the Hebrew Bible, Ancient Near East, Dead Sea Scrolls, etc. Maybe someday we'll build a brand for that; maybe we'll use Noet.com just to separate it from the Christian brand that might prevent sales to the Jewish market. Either way, selling more to more people helps fund the business and enables us to build more resources and better tools for everyone.

    -- Bob