How Anglican is NT Wright? :-)

However, I just discovered you have a few things left to do:

You're right.  One of the things need to do (and decide) is whether we actually need three categories.[:S]  I think the plan is to eliminate the two separate categories for the combined.[:D]

I suspect he was probably just as Anglican when he wrote his other books. (And which one is it that doesn't qualify as Episcopalian?)

Good point ... I'm really trying hard not to crack a few Anglican jokes here. [A]

One of the things need to do (and decide) is whether we actually need three categories.

MJ wondered the same thing a couple of hours ago: http://community.logos.com/forums/p/71607/498680.aspx#498680.

I think the plan is to eliminate the two separate categories for the combined.

Agreed (though if it was me I'd keep the 'Anglican' -- but then I'm not Anglican.) But it will ruin your 'status' in MJ's chart: http://community.logos.com/forums/p/71607/498475.aspx#498475[:D]

Ben is already grossly under worked[:P] Even "no one" has more work.[;)]

Ben is already grossly under worked Even "no one" has more work.

I'm trying to get him to convert to Orthodoxy so I can add to my staff.

I'm trying to get him to convert to Orthodoxy so I can add to my staff.

I'm already Catholic, Orthodox and Reformed ... just not Roman, Eastern or Protestant. [:D]

I'm trying to get him to convert to Orthodoxy so I can add to my staff.

I'm already Catholic, Orthodox and Reformed ... just not Roman, Eastern or Protestant. 

See how difficult he is to work with?

Ben is already grossly under worked Even "no one" has more work.

Many are called but few are chosen.

Also, I think my number should be modified to include the number people who read N.T.Wright.

I simply make my preferred resources ACELO churches (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern, Lutheran, Orthodox). I'd be perfectly happy to have the three of you (Andrew, Gabe, Ben) divide up the work however you want ... just make sure we all know it's out there.

I think my number should be modified to include the number people who read N.T.Wright.

[:D] They're certainly part of your market.

I think my number should be modified to include the number people who read N.T.Wright.

His books don't qualify as Anglican, but everyone who reads him does?[:O]

His books don't qualify as Anglican, but everyone who reads him does?

They better qualify as Anglican ... [:|]

His books don't qualify as Anglican, but everyone who reads him does?

I just realized that when collections are broken up, they aren't automatically tagged the same as their collection ... I need to fix that.

I just realized that when collections are broken up, they aren't automatically tagged the same as their collection ...

That wouldn't be such a good idea. A collection can be tagged as Anglican or Catholic because there is one book with an Anglican or Catholic author in it.

I'm trying to get him to convert to Orthodoxy so I can add to my staff.

He seems to be doing a better job of adding you to his.[8-|] A number of your Orthodox books have been written by Anglicans.[:D]

I'm (...)  Reformed

Quickly, hand him the Reformed portfolio before he changes his mind.[:P]

Also, I think my number should be modified to include the number people who read N.T.Wright.

Wright may be your best apologist. [;)]

Cliff

I think he'd have to compete with CS Lewis for that title.

That wouldn't be such a good idea. A collection can be tagged as Anglican or Catholic because there is one book with an Anglican or Catholic author in it.

Good point ... I guess I'll have to do it manually. *sigh* [:(]

I guess I'll have to do it manually. *sigh* 

Yes, that was kind of why I started the thread.[;)] I bet you wish you'd taken that decision about Anglican/Episcopal before you did all the tagging you've already done.[:D]

Here's another one that's missing 'Anglican' tagging: Studia Biblica (5 vols.) ('Members of the University of Oxford', those have got to be mainly Anglicans.)

Here's another one that's missing 'Anglican' tagging: Studia Biblica (5 vols.) ('Members of the University of Oxford', those have got to be mainly Anglicans.)

Thanks for catching that! [:D] I've tagged it. [Y]

More/new problems with NT Wright on logos.com:

• None of the 'for Everyone' books are tagged with series. The website simply doesn't know of such a series.

• The New Testament for Everyone Series (18 vols.) isn't tagged with anything at all. I believe it used to have 16 or 17 volumes, and appropriate tags. Perhaps someone forgot to move the tags over when the expanded series was created?

• The same goes for the Christian Origins and the Question of God Series (4 vols.).

• Revelation for Everyone was on prepub not that long ago, probably in an upgrade with another volume. Now the upgrade has been merged with the series, and discontinued, but without the individual volumes being made available separately. Surely you didn't mean for these two (?) volumes to be the only ones not available outside the series? Normally with a merge, the newest volumes are also made available separately, or the upgrade is kept on (cf Hermeneia). (If you fix this, please update Tom Wright on Revelation.)

• As a search for NT Wright finds 61 items and only 42 of them are tagged as Anglican, there may also still be other books that lack correct tagging.

I see the expanded AYB is also missing all tags, so I suspect all series that have been expanded recently ought to be checked for these errors.

And while you're at it, could you tell someone that something's wrong with The United Bible Societies' Old Testament Handbook Series (29 vols.) and The United Bible Societies’ New Testament Handbook Series (20 vols.). I'm seeing the full prices in spite of the fact that I own them both.

And while you're at it, could you tell someone that something's wrong with The United Bible Societies' Old Testament Handbook Series (29 vols.) and The United Bible Societies’ New Testament Handbook Series (20 vols.). I'm seeing the full prices in spite of the fact that I own them both.

I think that means those collections don't have dynamic pricing turned on for them.   Only collections with dynamic pricing go to zero when you own them.

You should still see the greyed out "Add to cart" button that tells you that you already own the product when you move the mouse over it.

I think that means those collections don't have dynamic pricing turned on for them.   Only collections with dynamic pricing go to zero when you own them.

I think you're probably right.[:$] I guess I've become too used to those zeros.[:)]

More/new problems with NT Wright on logos.com:

Thanks for pointing these out, I really appreciate it!

• The New Testament for Everyone Series (18 vols.) isn't tagged with anything at all. I believe it used to have 16 or 17 volumes, and appropriate tags. Perhaps someone forgot to move the tags over when the expanded series was created?

• The same goes for the Christian Origins and the Question of God Series (4 vols.).

I believe I've fixed these, let me know if you still can't see them.

As a search for NT Wright finds 61 items and only 42 of them are tagged as Anglican, there may also still be other books that lack correct tagging.

I'll look into this and make sure it's corrected.

• Revelation for Everyone was on prepub not that long ago, probably in an upgrade with another volume. Now the upgrade has been merged with the series, and discontinued, but without the individual volumes being made available separately. Surely you didn't mean for these two (?) volumes to be the only ones not available outside the series? Normally with a merge, the newest volumes are also made available separately, or the upgrade is kept on (cf Hermeneia). (If you fix this, please update Tom Wright on Revelation.)

I agree.  I'll see if something is already in the works.

I believe I've fixed these, let me know if you still can't see them.

I can now see the Anglican tag, but all other tags are still missing.

Revelation for Everyone

I've submitted a request to have this title offered on its own.  It should be split out by the first week of March. [:)]