Gabe Martini said:

Keep in mind, base packages are going to be more specifically defined along denominational/church/traditional lines

In that case, it seems to me that Pentecostal is better. The term "charismatic" usually refers to the renewal movement (of the 60's/70's) that mostly focused within established churches of various denominations.

A third term "Third Wave" refers primarily to the Vineyard movement and others along the same line. It's a more recent theological movement and some within the movement would simply define themselves as "Pentecostal" while others would distance themselves from that term.

Still from a historic stream perspective, or denominational/church/(theological) tradition, the best term is probably still "Pentecostal." IMHO, of course (as one from a Reformed perspective, with a lot of Pentecostal/Charismatic/Third Wave leanings).

Gabe Martini said:

Keep in mind, base packages are going to be more specifically defined along denominational/church/traditional lines, while bundles, add-on products, and collections will continue to be marked more specifically to 'viewpoints' (Calvinism, Arminianism, Christology, etc.). 

I think you answered your own question. Pentecostal is denominational while Charismatic is a movement within many denominations at least as the terms are used in this neck of the woods.

Gabe Martini said:

I'm interested in some input from our forum users, especially those from a charismatic or pentecostal/AOG background.

Pentecostal/Charismatic

looks good even though I'm from a Pentecostal or Apostolic/AOG/CRC/CCC background (the acronyms belong to Pentecostal movements in Oz).

But I hope Logos won't tag me as Anglican because that's how the software currently sees me!

Gabe Martini said:

I'm interested in some input from our forum users, especially those from a charismatic or pentecostal/AOG background.

Keep in mind, base packages are going to be more specifically defined along denominational/church/traditional lines, while bundles, add-on products, and collections will continue to be marked more specifically to 'viewpoints' (Calvinism, Arminianism, Chris

I've been thinking about this more and I think it really depends on how you select your resources. To satisfy the above conditions, I think you've already answered your question: it should be called a Pentecostal base package.

But a basic question is "How are you selecting the resources for this base package?"

Pentecostal churches/denominations have long-standing theological traditions (with some variation between denominations). If you choose resources that come specifically and exclusively out of those theological traditions, then you should call it a Pentecostal base package. One problem here is that there has been some long-standing resistance among some Pentecostals to enter the academic world of careful Biblical scholarship (perhaps because of the treatment they received from academics early on). This has thankfully changed, but the Pentecostal world is not flush with resources that fit the Logos model for study very well.

If Logos is going to cast a wider net in terms of the resources for this package, and include (e.g.) Vineyard resources, stuff from the Catholic, Anglican, Reformed, Lutheran and other charismatic writers, then you should call it what it would be: Pentecostal/Charismatic. But then this wouldn't be along a particular denominational line, nor follow a specifically Pentecostal theological tradition. It would be more inclusive and thus frustrate some Pentecostals who might strongly disagree with some of the material included, and some Charismatics as well. 

From a marketing perspective, and from a resource perspective, I personally believe a Pentecostal/Charismatic collection makes the most sense. Most Pentecostals I know are quite aware of the theological differences they have with parts of the Charismatic movement, and most Charismatics understand the differences they have with some of traditional Pentecostal theology. Further a single base package with a wide range of perspectives would be most helpful to both groups (IMHO), even if some individuals don't think so.

In other words the name for the base package should reflect the qualifications you are using to include resources in it.