Martin Luther - which works do I want?

FaithLife carries a number of collections of the works of Martin Luther. I'm not Lutheran, but I want to make sure that I have in my own library a readable, well-translated collection (or two) of at least some of his work that includes anything particularly important, frequently cited, etc.

I don't need to have everything, and I don't want to spend a huge amount of money on this. For the purposes of this thread, I'm not very interested in other early Reformers.

What, in the FL catalog, should I look at, and why? What might I want to skip over, and why?

I do have a $10 USD pre-order in for this: https://www.logos.com/product/54505/works-of-martin-luther-with-introductions-and-notes but I don't know if it will be sufficient or even suitable for my purposes.

What do you all think?

Find more posts tagged with

Lutheran Products

Comments

Mark Barnes

What, in the FL catalog, should I look at, and why? What might I want to skip over, and why?

I do have a $10 USD pre-order in for this: https://www.logos.com/product/54505/works-of-martin-luther-with-introductions-and-notes but I don't know if it will be sufficient or even suitable for my purposes.

Personally, I'd skip that. There's too much missing.

If you don't want to buy the full 55 volumes, then I'd suggest Martin Luther's Basic Theological Writings, 3rd ed. It includes most of the important stuff, such as:

The Ninety-Five Theses
Lectures on Galatians
The Bondage of the Will (though not all of it)
Table Talk

Plus it has introductions, which is probably helpful to you.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/846885#Comment_846885

What, in the FL catalog, should I look at, and why? What might I want to skip over, and why?

I do have a $10 USD pre-order in for this: https://www.logos.com/product/54505/works-of-martin-luther-with-introductions-and-notes but I don't know if it will be sufficient or even suitable for my purposes.

Personally, I'd skip that. There's too much missing.

I don't even know what's in it, never mind what's missing.

What I have already of Luther's is HC#36 and a separate edition of the 95 Theses, so it isn't much.

I don't intend to do an in-depth study of Luther, or even to do a focused study of Luther, at this point. I just want to hand expand my holdings usefully beyond what I have.

SineNomine

Can anyone offer any further input?

Colin

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847625#Comment_847625

Hi SineNomine,

I think Mark's suggestion is an excellent one. I suspect for your purposes that primary works (without editorial comments coming from an evangelical protestant perspective) may be more useful. Still, the volume Mark recommends has a really good mix of theological, polemical, pastoral and exegetical material.

In any case, here are the primary works of Luther in these 2 volumes. Each one has a separate editorial introduction.

Volume 1.

Disputation On Indulgences (1517)

Treatise On Baptism (1519)

Discussion Of Confession (1520)

The Fourteen Of Consolation (1520)

Treatise On Good Works (1520)

Treatise On The New Testament (1520)

The Papacy At Rome (1520)

Volume 2.

A Treatise Concerning The Blessed Sacrament And Concerning The Brotherhoods (1519).

A Treatise Concerning The Ban (1520).

An Open Letter To The Christian Nobility (1520).

The Babylonian Captivity Of The Church (1520).

A Treatise On Christian Liberty (1520).

A Brief Explanation Of The Ten Commandments, The Creed, And The Lord’s Prayer (1520).

The Eight Wittenberg Sermons (1522).

That Doctrines Of Men Are To Be Rejected (1522)

I hope that helps.

Colin.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847643#Comment_847643

I hope that helps.

I think it does. The two volume collection seems to be focused very much on the early Luther, and therefore to exclude a lot of his better known work.

David Wanat

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847648#Comment_847648

I was thinking about getting the Basic Works suggested by Marc Barnes but I have a question. I see "Table Talk" is listed as part of fragments. Does that mean it's only part of the existing work or are fragments all that exist of this work?

Sorry for my ignorance on the subject.

Colin

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847656#Comment_847656

Hi David,

It is part of the standard volume of Luther's works in English (beginning at p. 428 as can be seen from the contents page on the Logos listing).

LW 54 itself has 516 pages and consists of a selection from over 7,000 conversations in the German edition.

In my opinion, Table Talk can be entertaining but it is not one of the more representative and authoritative parts of Luther's writings available to us.

Colin.

David Wanat

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847659#Comment_847659

Hi David,

It is part of the standard volume of Luther's works in English (beginning at p. 428 as can be seen from the title page).

LW 54 itself has 516 pages and consists of a selection from over 7,000 conversations in the German edition.

In my opinion, Table Talk can be entertaining but it is not one of the more representative and authoritative parts of Luther's writings available to us.

Colin.

I understand. I was mainly interested because I have seen snippets quoted but with no idea as to whether they were quoted in context or unjustly mangled to make him look bad. (That's also why I am interested in the whole basic set. I figure it is better to be informed than to repeat misinformation)

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847661#Comment_847661

You definitely need The Book of Concord. Then what I would do if I wasn't sure I was following Mark's suggestion would be to run some of my books with quotes from Luther through the concordance and see what is quoted most frequently.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847677#Comment_847677

You definitely need The Book of Concord. Then what I would do if I wasn't sure I was following Mark's suggestion would be to run some of my books with quotes from Luther through the concordance and see what is quoted most frequently.

I followed your advice and then some, creating concordances for my most frequently accessed resources, important reference books, the few Luther/Reformation-focused studies in my library, and everything else with a lot of hits for Martin Luther in a basic search. Judging by the results, all I need are the Book of Concord and the 95 Theses. Other than those, I think I saw maybe one or two references to a sermon or two. That said, my library is not representative of my reading in theology, largely because FaithLife has many, many relevant academic journals still to add to its collection.

Mark Barnes

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847745#Comment_847745

The Book of Concord postdates Luther by several decades. It's obviously useful for studies on Lutheranism, but it won't enlighten you too much regarding Luther himself.

As for the 95 theses, whilst it's obviously vital, it's also very early. You'll need more than that if you want something representative.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847792#Comment_847792

The Book of Concord contains the following by Martin Luther:

Small Catechism
Large Catechism
Smalcald Articles
and in some editions A brief Admonition to Confession (appendix to Larger Catechism)

Edited by Phillipp Melanchthon, close ally of Luther and standard source for early Lutheran thought:

Augsburg Confession
Apology of the Augsburg Confession
Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope

Other documents:

3 Ecumenical Creeds
Formula of Concord

It was collected to quell the religious quarrels within the Lutheran movement following Luther's death with the intent of preserving pure Lutheranism.

Jan Krohn

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847656#Comment_847656

I was thinking about getting the Basic Works suggested by Marc Barnes but I have a question. I see "Table Talk" is listed as part of fragments. Does that mean it's only part of the existing work or are fragments all that exist of this work?

I found the answer to that. There are more than 7000 table talks, according to the German Wikipedia page on Luther's works:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimarer_Ausgabe_(Luther)#Abteilung_Tischreden

Here's a list of what's available in English:

http://therebelgod.com/Luther/

I guess the table talks are listed as "fragments" because only about 4500 of them have been translated (yet).

Virgil Buttram

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847794#Comment_847794

The Book of Concord contains the following by Martin Luther:

Small Catechism

Large Catechism

Smalcald Articles

and in some editions A brief Admonition to Confession (appendix to Larger Catechism)

Edited by Phillipp Melanchthon, close ally of Luther and standard source for early Lutheran thought:

Augsburg Confession

Apology of the Augsburg Confession

Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope

Other documents:

3 Ecumenical Creeds

Formula of Concord

It was collected to quell the religious quarrels within the Lutheran movement following Luther's death with the intent of preserving pure Lutheranism.

Current scholarship credits Luther with the "Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope". This does not appear to be a consensus view among all Reformation scholars.

Budget permitting, Luther's Works is the most extensive set of Luther's writings available in Logos. The other Luther collections are subsets, and likely from different translators.

As noted upthread, when Luther wrote something is important to consider. His basic theology did not change, but the tone and emphasis of his topics did.

David Wanat

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/847801#Comment_847801

I found the answer to that. There are more than 7000 table talks, according to the German Wikipedia page on Luther's works:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimarer_Ausgabe_(Luther)#Abteilung_Tischreden

Here's a list of what's available in English:

http://therebelgod.com/Luther/

I guess the table talks are listed as "fragments" because only about 4500 of them have been translated (yet).

Thanks. That clears up my question.

Don Stults

Luther himself suggested his catechism and the commentary on Genesis. Outside of the book of Concord his commentary on Galatians is the only required Luther I remember from seminary. He is most loved for his Hymns and sermons. Yet you get the most intimate look at him in his letters.

fgh

Given your background, I suspect you'd find his little commentary on the Magnificat interesting.

Ken McGuire

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/851449#Comment_851449

Given your background, I suspect you'd find his little commentary on the Magnificat interesting.

Yes, it is good - and would show some important continuity with Rome. But I would also recommend the Apology to the Augsburg Confession (by Melanchthon and in the Book of Concord) or the new addition of Freedom of a Christian to a Roman Catholic who is interested in listening to Lutherans seriously. I suspect you will see them as deeply influenced by theology that has gone before - even while they do criticize some formulations as well.

Unfortunately Luther learned his theology from Biel - and so we Lutherans and Roman Catholics can easily talk past each other...

Virgil Buttram

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/851469#Comment_851469

Unfortunately Luther learned his theology from Biel - and so we Lutherans and Roman Catholics can easily talk past each other...

I knew that we have been talking past each other since the Reformation, and I knew that Luther was trained in the tradition of Biel, but I had never put the two together before. Thanks for the insight!

I would recommend Luther's Faith by Daniel Olivier as an excellent Roman Catholic take on Luther, which takes him and his theology at face value, neither demonizing nor lionizing him. Unfortunately, it is not (yet!) available in Logos.

Ken McGuire

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/851621#Comment_851621

I knew that we have been talking past each other since the Reformation, and I knew that Luther was trained in the tradition of Biel, but I had never put the two together before. Thanks for the insight!

Some of that understanding is from a ex-Lutheran who has "swam the Tiber". I think it was Wilken, but not sure. Also from David Steinmetz who pointed out the drastically different ways St. Thomas Aquinas has been read over history, and his argument that Luther never really experienced the way Aquinas has been received by the Roman Church. Add in the development that both sides have had since then, and it is easy to miss each other's point. I know when I hear criticisms of Jansenism I often cringe - and yet, as a Lutheran I have to admit that that I would also want to criticize a Jansenistic separating of Grace from the sacraments...

Speaking of David Steinmetz, it would be nice to have his Luther in Context in Logos.