Collection for Study Bibles?
I have been trying to setup a collection strictly for the "study bibles" in L6- anyone have a suggestion?
It looks like FL needs a separate TYPE for these- probably, just my guess "study bible."
Comments
-
Two suggestions from https://wiki.logos.com/Example_Collections
Study Bibles
- Library Size: 2251
- Collection Size: 5
- Rule: title:”study Bible”
- Manually Included Items: The NET Bible (While not a Study Bible it is a well noted Bible so I added it. Your inclusion is, of course, your choice.)
- Manually Excluded Items: none
Study Bibles
- Library Size: 9,564 edition:Logos
- Collection Size: 24
- Rule: Title:(“Edition Notes”,Open,Study) Title:Bible -Type:(Concordance,Monograph)
- Manually Included Items: none
- Manually Excluded Items: none
0 -
Graham have tried both they are full of non_SB items and just plain don't work.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:
It looks like FL needs a separate TYPE for these- probably, just my guess "study bible."
"Bible Notes" is the Logos type for study bibles as defined by Logos.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Graham Criddle said:
Two suggestions from https://wiki.logos.com/Example_Collections
Study Bibles
- Library Size: 2251
- Collection Size: 5
- Rule: title:”study Bible”
- Manually Included Items: The NET Bible (While not a Study Bible it is a well noted Bible so I added it. Your inclusion is, of course, your choice.)
- Manually Excluded Items: none
Study Bibles
- Library Size: 9,564 edition:Logos
- Collection Size: 24
- Rule: Title:(“Edition Notes”,Open,Study) Title:Bible -Type:(Concordance,Monograph)
- Manually Included Items: none
- Manually Excluded Items: none
Neither works well at all- to much non-SB items to deal with.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:Whyndell Grizzard said:
It looks like FL needs a separate TYPE for these- probably, just my guess "study bible."
"Bible Notes" is the Logos type for study bibles as defined by Logos.
Tried this as well- brought 60 items- all kinds of resources.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:MJ. Smith said:Whyndell Grizzard said:
It looks like FL needs a separate TYPE for these- probably, just my guess "study bible."
"Bible Notes" is the Logos type for study bibles as defined by Logos.
Tried this as well- brought 60 items- all kinds of resources.
This is funny! type:"bible notes" brings up non of my Study Bibles, although all of them say Bible Notes as Type in the library...
0 -
-
Title:("Edition Notes",Open,Study) Title:Bible -Type:(Concordance,Monograph)
then minused the image and infographic resources
Edit: I see this rule was already posted above
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:
... collection strictly for the "study bibles" in L6- anyone have a suggestion?
Type:(Bible,"Bible Notes") Title:"Study Bible"
With Commentary in Type list, one more Study Bible appears
Type:(Bible,"Bible Notes",Commentary) Title:"Study Bible"
Bible Study + Teaching
(Subject:Bibl AND Subject:(Patriarchs,Reading,Reference,"Second Advent",Stud,Teaching)) OR Subject:"Small groups" OR Series:"Bible Study" OR (Edition:eBook AND Title:"Bible Study")
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
I found it easy enough to "tag-it-yourself" and then make a collection. I am picky about what I want to show up and have 17 resources--not too many to tag on my own.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:
Tried this as well- brought 60 items- all kinds of resources.
I'd be interested in what it brought up that wasn't a Study Bible under the Logos definition ... they omit the Complete Word Study Bible as not being a true Study Bible and they exclude two that they treat as single volume commentaries: The Catholic Study Bible, The Jewish Study Bible, It seemed a bit odd at first that they consider text and translation notes on major ancient manuscripts as "study Bibles" but it is in keeping with the spirit of some Bible Notes especially for the NET Bible.
What are some of the problematic titles in your collection? i.e. are they miscoded or is your definition of study Bibles different than that of Logos?
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:MJ. Smith said:Whyndell Grizzard said:
It looks like FL needs a separate TYPE for these- probably, just my guess "study bible."
"Bible Notes" is the Logos type for study bibles as defined by Logos.
Tried this as well- brought 60 items- all kinds of resources.
I expect you didn't add quotes. type:bible notes is not the same as type:"bible notes". The latter is what you want, and should be fine, although personally I use type:"bible notes" -subject:("O.T.", "N.T.") -series:"numerical bible" just to fine-tune it slightly.
This is my personal Faithlife account. On 1 March 2022, I started working for Faithlife, and have a new 'official' user account. Posts on this account shouldn't be taken as official Faithlife views!
0 -
I was looking to isolate just "study bibles" as in ESV, MacArthur, NKJV, etc.
0 -
-
Mark Barnes said:Whyndell Grizzard said:MJ. Smith said:Whyndell Grizzard said:
It looks like FL needs a separate TYPE for these- probably, just my guess "study bible."
"Bible Notes" is the Logos type for study bibles as defined by Logos.
Tried this as well- brought 60 items- all kinds of resources.
I expect you didn't add quotes. type:bible notes is not the same as type:"bible notes". The latter is what you want, and should be fine, although personally I use type:"bible notes" -subject:("O.T.", "N.T.") -series:"numerical bible" just to fine-tune it slightly.
Yes that works much better- narrows the resource down to basically- just study bibles, thanks.
0 -
A few resources which might be missed:
The Open Bible (which is type commentary)
The Spirit-Filled Life Bible (which is type Bible)
The Spirit-Filled Life Bible for Women (which is type Bible)
Blessings,
FloydPastor-Patrick.blogspot.com
0 -
Floyd Johnson said:
A few resources which might be missed:
The Open Bible (which is type commentary)
The Spirit-Filled Life Bible (which is type Bible)
The Spirit-Filled Life Bible for Women (which is type Bible)
The Jewish Study Bible is also type Bible Commentary but you might want to include it.
Pastor, North Park Baptist Church
Bridgeport, CT USA
0 -
Mark Smith said:
The Jewish Study Bible is also type Bible Commentary but you might want to include it.
I saw that, but the title:"Study Bible" should catch that.
There are also a number of one-volume Bible Commentaries that might fit well into a collection of Study Bibles - but that could be an individual call.
Blessings,
FloydPastor-Patrick.blogspot.com
0 -
steve clark said:
refined my rule to title:"study bible" type:"Bible Notes"
Now it finds all my Study Bibles and now there are no exclusions
I settled for Type:("Bible Notes", commentary) "Study Bible" since some SBs are of type bible commentary (as others explained) and the text "Study Bible" might not be in the title, but elsewhere, such as in the series, the community tags or the resource description (re series: such as my two OT volumes of The Ignatius Catholic Study Bible)
Have joy in the Lord!
0 -
NB.Mick said:steve clark said:
refined my rule to title:"study bible" type:"Bible Notes"
Now it finds all my Study Bibles and now there are no exclusions
I settled for Type:("Bible Notes", commentary) "Study Bible" since some SBs are of type bible commentary (as others explained) and the text "Study Bible" might not be in the title, but elsewhere, such as in the series, the community tags or the resource description (re series: such as my two OT volumes of The Ignatius Catholic Study Bible)
This works better for me:
Type:("Bible Notes", commentary) "Study Bible" -author:barclay
0 -
Fasil said:NB.Mick said:steve clark said:
refined my rule to title:"study bible" type:"Bible Notes"
Now it finds all my Study Bibles and now there are no exclusions
I settled for Type:("Bible Notes", commentary) "Study Bible" since some SBs are of type bible commentary (as others explained) and the text "Study Bible" might not be in the title, but elsewhere, such as in the series, the community tags or the resource description (re series: such as my two OT volumes of The Ignatius Catholic Study Bible)
This works better for me:
Type:("Bible Notes", commentary) "Study Bible" -author:barclay
So you don't like The Nelson Study Bible ? [;)]
Have joy in the Lord!
0 -
the rule I use (and I don't remember where I got it from) nets 3 more results than the one from this thread (37 vs 34).
Title:("Edition Notes",Open,Study) Title:Bible -Type:(Concordance,Monograph)
They both seemed to find a handful of commentaries that I could exclude pretty readily.L2 lvl4 (...) WORDsearch, all the way through L10,
0 -
abondservant said:
he rule I use (and I don't remember where I got it from) nets 3 more results than the one from this thread (37 vs 34).
Title:("Edition Notes",Open,Study) Title:Bible -Type:(Concordance,Monograph)You got it from the wiki (or the source for the wiki entry) - posted on page 1 of this thread - but back then there were much less types. I tend to see Infographics, Media Collections and such that belong to the FSB as false positives, same with the text of bibles such as NET and ESV Apocrypha, where the actual notes - meanwhile - exist in the type bible notes.
Have joy in the Lord!
0 -
abondservant said:
the rule I use (and I don't remember where I got it from) nets 3 more results than the one from this thread (37 vs 34).
Title:("Edition Notes",Open,Study) Title:Bible -Type:(Concordance,Monograph)
They both seemed to find a handful of commentaries that I could exclude pretty readily.Using this rule I net 73 resources- a lot of momographs I would not consider SB material- but of course thats subjective on my part.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:abondservant said:
the rule I use (and I don't remember where I got it from) nets 3 more results than the one from this thread (37 vs 34).
Title:("Edition Notes",Open,Study) Title:Bible -Type:(Concordance,Monograph)
They both seemed to find a handful of commentaries that I could exclude pretty readily.Using this rule I net 73 resources- a lot of momographs I would not consider SB material- but of course thats subjective on my part.
Did you type or paste the rule? Because it excludes type:monograph.
Have joy in the Lord!
0 -
NB- copy and paste - double checked rule it was correctly done.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:
NB- copy and paste - double checked rule it was correctly done.
Typed it in got 38 resources, but not what I trying to accomplish- thanks for the suggestion.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:Whyndell Grizzard said:
NB- copy and paste - double checked rule it was correctly done.
Typed it in got 38 resources, but not what I trying to accomplish- thanks for the suggestion.
Strange - I've just tried it and don't get any resources of type "monograph" - but our libraries will be different
Can you post a screenshot?
0 -
Graham Criddle said:Whyndell Grizzard said:Whyndell Grizzard said:
NB- copy and paste - double checked rule it was correctly done.
Typed it in got 38 resources, but not what I trying to accomplish- thanks for the suggestion.
Strange - I've just tried it and don't get any resources of type "monograph" - but our libraries will be different
Can you post a screenshot?
0 -
.png)
Hopefully see this better
0
