Is there a way to get rid of the lectionary/preferred Bible things on the top of the homepage? I'd rather there be blank space than things I don't ever want to use.
I have to agree with this one....
This is what I would like to see:
Nice mockup / photoshop Damian.
I wouldn't mind if you could turn on/off some links between the Logo and the scripture input:
Damian,
Yes...that seems like the consensus...
We've got a couple more sections coming up there -- so I'm hoping we can deliver some value there in a future release and change your mind...
I'm hoping we can deliver some value there in a future release and change your mind
Bob,
all things are possible But, i hope you reconsider placing items related to preferences in this space (eg. Preferred Bible).
The plan all along has been that once you choose your preferred Bible, this feature slides to the far right.
This one preference is so important, we want people to see it right away without digging through the Settings panel. But we're afraid that if we simply hide that feature after they've chosen, they'll be confused if they go looking to change it, and haven't yet gotten to the point where they're familiar with resource prioritization, etc. So we'll leave it in the features, but just as the lowest priority.
Today's reading plans Today's Bible (automatically returns to where you were yesterday) Or even a link to Logos forums or support.
I agree. I also have no problem with the preferred Bible there. It should be easy to change. I am not sure 100% what Bible I want. Usually I have ESV there . Many times I turn NET and sometimes the old Czech Kralitz Bible :-)
so I'm hoping we can deliver some value there in a future release and change your mind...
Go for it [:D]
But we're afraid that if we simply hide that feature after they've chosen, they'll be confused if they go looking to change it, and haven't yet gotten to the point where they're familiar with resource prioritization,
Fair enough. But, I hope that there's been some rethinking on the way in which prioritisation works. We haven't heard much more about this. The way it stands, I'm not sure anyone could really be described as "familiar" with the process. IMHO, v3.0 was easier to deal with just harder to find.
But we're afraid that if we simply hide that feature after they've chosen, they'll be confused if they go looking to change it, and haven't yet gotten to the point where they're familiar with resource prioritization, Bob, Fair enough. But, I hope that there's been some rethinking on the way in which prioritisation works. We haven't heard much more about this. The way it stands, I'm not sure anyone could really be described as "familiar" with the process. IMHO, v3.0 was easier to deal with just harder to find.
Sorry if it seems where ganging up on you again Bob, us Aussies that is, but I share Damian's thoughts on this, some sort of re-think on prioritisation is really needed...maybe its great for an off the shelf lower end boxed set...but its just way to confusing to work out exactly what is piroritised at the moment.
