FEEDBACK WANTED: New Resource Toolbar on Desktop

13468918

Comments

  • Robert M. Warren
    Robert M. Warren Member Posts: 2,459 ✭✭✭

    I was only willing to read the first three or four pages of this thread, so forgive me if I am re-paving anythibng.

    The new toolbar is completely exhausting for me. Granted: I am on tumbling-gravel precipice side of the blindness spectrum, but I was at least marginally functional with the former toolbar / interface.

    If there will be no way to opt-out of the new toolbar, I will be forced to forgo the other benefits and drop my subscription. I'm no programmer, but as another replier has suggested, since non-subscribers will open Logos with the former toolbar, it doesn't seem to be a Manhattan-Project-level task to enable subscribers to opt-out.

    macOS (Logos Pro - Beta) | Android 13 (Logos Stable)

    Smile

  • DMB
    DMB Member Posts: 14,164 ✭✭✭✭

    ...  it doesn't seem to be a Manhattan-Project-level task to enable subscribers to opt-out.

    Maybe a Newark-level.

    I suspect they're married to that toolbar. For some reason Faithlife hates user-customizing choices. Years ago, the Tools menu was made customizable, abd rumor has it, .... well, someone's career plateau'd.

    I just hope the new toolbar doesn't leak into non-subscribers' UI. 

    "If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.

  • Mark Barnes (Logos)
    Mark Barnes (Logos) Administrator, Logos Employee Posts: 1,991

    The new toolbar is completely exhausting for me. Granted: I am on tumbling-gravel precipice side of the blindness spectrum, but I was at least marginally functional with the former toolbar / interface.

    Can you help me understand your difficulties better?

  • Paul
    Paul Member Posts: 44 ✭✭

    Can you help me understand your difficulties better?

    Too many clicks. For example, multiple book view is three clicks vs. the former one click. Too many options to read through vs. the old toolbar was a simple icon to click.

    The ability to customize the toolbar would be ideal. The option of text+icon, text-only, or icon only with hover description would be great. Rearranging the order of the menu or your own custom menu panel with frequently used options.

    Until then, a settings option to toggle subscription toolbar vs. non-subscription toolbar works. As a subscriber, I would prefer to have the old one back.

  • Dave Hooton
    Dave Hooton MVP Posts: 36,074

    Paul said:

    Can you help me understand your difficulties better?

    Too many clicks. For example, multiple book view is three clicks vs. the former one click. Too many options to read through vs. the old toolbar was a simple icon to click.

    The ability to customize the toolbar would be ideal. The option of text+icon, text-only, or icon only with hover description would be great. Rearranging the order of the menu or your own custom menu panel with frequently used options.

    Until then, a settings option to toggle subscription toolbar vs. non-subscription toolbar works. As a subscriber, I would prefer to have the old one back.

    The subscription toolbar is bad design when one panel menu is replaced with 6 additional menus whose content one has to guess, especially with the ironically name Tools menu in what used to be a Toolbar. We even have the meaningless More menu when horizontal space is lacking on top of the extra vertical space/line. At least we knew where to go for additional functions with the "non-subscription" Panel menu.

    Dave
    ===

    Windows 11 & Android 13

  • Tim Deahl
    Tim Deahl Member Posts: 64 ✭✭

    Totally agree with Dave. The new toolbar is a cluttered mess!

  • Robert M. Warren
    Robert M. Warren Member Posts: 2,459 ✭✭✭

    Can you help me understand your difficulties better?

    Thanks. Actually, this is more a Robert / Life Itself issue. If I had more carefully worded my reply, I would have made it sound less disparaging of this UI and more a lamentation for a major UI change. My vision field is likely in the single digits, so a UI re-working is akin to re-arranging furniture. My main message should have been lobbying for a switcheroo option.

    Since I'm confident you all put a lot of thought and work into this, I'll give it a while longer.

    macOS (Logos Pro - Beta) | Android 13 (Logos Stable)

    Smile

  • Jerry Bush
    Jerry Bush Member Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭

    I like the new toolbar quite a bit! Takes some time to learn where things are, but I think it's a fairly short learning curve.

    Macbook Air (2024), Apple M2, 16gb Ram, Mac Sequoia, 1TB storage

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,719

    The subscription toolbar is bad design when one panel menu is replaced with 6 additional menus whose content one has to guess, especially with the ironically name Tools menu in what used to be a Toolbar. We even have the meaningless More menu when horizontal space is lacking on top of the extra vertical space/line. At least we knew where to go for additional functions with the "non-subscription" Panel menu.

    I've been using the revised tool heavily the last couple of weeks for real work not testing. I have found the following elements annoying:

    • I keep guessing wrong whether something is in Formatting or View.
    • I really miss the ability to toggle the interlinear which is a feature I frequently use.
    • The Find still being on the resource menu rather than under search confounded me as a blatant design inconsistency. 
    • there are still a few bugs e.g. factbook that affected me.

    Do I like the additional clicks? No.

    Do I think the new design is an improvement? Yes, not for power users but for the general user.

    Do I think there ought to be an option to retain the old format? No, I hate wasting the ongoing support dual solutions require.

    What I would propose is an additional tab "power user" which includes the toggling options of the old design, the find, and options from other tabs that the user wants at hand. This would allow the power user to select the power user tag, leave it open, and have the lost functionality back at their fingertips without additional clicks while retaining the more discoverable aspects of the dynamic toolbar.

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • Jerry Bush
    Jerry Bush Member Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭

    MJ. Smith said:

    • I keep guessing wrong whether something is in Formatting or View.
    • I really miss the ability to toggle the interlinear which is a feature I frequently use.
    • The Find still being on the resource menu rather than under search confounded me as a blatant design inconsistency. 
    • there are still a few bugs e.g. factbook that affected me.

    MJ, although I do like the new toolbar, I agree with your points here. Especially your second point.

    Macbook Air (2024), Apple M2, 16gb Ram, Mac Sequoia, 1TB storage

  • Mark Barnes (Logos)
    Mark Barnes (Logos) Administrator, Logos Employee Posts: 1,991

    Thanks for the feedback. Please keep it coming.

    We're considering adding more keyboard shortcuts for frequently used features that now require more clicks, such as "Add parallel text" and "Interlinear".

  • PL
    PL Member Posts: 2,158 ✭✭✭

    After using it for a bit now, I agree with the feedback here. I suggest:

    • Combine Formatting and View into View
    • Make "Show Footnotes" its own option under View
    • Remove "Find" on the 3-vertical-dots menu
    • Provide some personalization options
    • Do something to reduce the visual busyness and crowdedness (shorten some of the verbose labels e.g. "Add parallel text" => "Parallel view"; "Start reading plan" => "Reading plan"; reduce vertical space if possible; provide Icon Only option; etc)
    • For ebooks that aren't indexed and have no page numbers, get rid of the non-functional empty text box in front of "Home"

    In general I think the new toolbar is much easier to understand especially for new users. But it will take a bit of getting-used to for long-time users.

    I don't think offering both the old and new is a good idea. It will be confusing and will create a support nightmare even in forum discussions.

    This is akin to when Microsoft introduced the "ribbon" to MS Office.

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,719

    PL said:

    Remove "Find" on the 3-vertical-dots menu

    But keep the functionality - just move it into the dynamic menu.

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • PL
    PL Member Posts: 2,158 ✭✭✭

    It's already there, under the Search tab, right?

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,719

    PL said:

    It's already there, under the Search tab, right?

    Nope, only the inline search with a misleading prompt in the argument box ...

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • Anderson Abreu
    Anderson Abreu Member Posts: 559 ✭✭✭

    PL said:

    • Provide some personalization options
    • Do something to reduce the visual distraction (shorten some of the verbose labels e.g. "Add parallel text" => "Parallel view"; "Start reading plan" => "Reading plan"; reduce vertical space if possible, etc)

    Very good!

    ____________

    "... And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." (Ne 8.10)

  • PL
    PL Member Posts: 2,158 ✭✭✭

    MJ. Smith said:

    Nope, only the inline search with a misleading prompt in the argument box ...

    Sorry, what's the difference between the two functions (Search and Find)? Which one is inline search, and what does the other one do?

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 33,096

    PL said:

    Which one is inline search, and what does the other one do?

    The Search menu implements Inline Search (although currently not with all the functionality when used the previous toolbar)

    The Find in this panel option opens a small search box enabling you to conduct simple textual searches within the resource - but not using the full Logos search syntax.

    If you try each one, you should see the differences.

  • Aaron Hamilton
    Aaron Hamilton Member, MVP Posts: 1,445

    Why not call it what it is, and instead of the grey "Find" within the inline search bar, say "Inline Search"?

    I understand it may create some confusion incorporating the actual find search and the inline search side by side, but if there were a workable solution, I agree this would be a nice change, having both search possibilities within the search tab.

    Why is "Print/Export" listed both under the tools and the share tab? I feel like the share tab is more fitting, and I don't see why it needs to be duplicated.

  • Anderson Abreu
    Anderson Abreu Member Posts: 559 ✭✭✭

    Why is "Print/Export" listed both under the tools and the share tab? I feel like the share tab is more fitting, and I don't see why it needs to be duplicated.

    I imagine it's because I might want to “share” by printing or generating a file to be sent.

    ____________

    "... And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." (Ne 8.10)

  • Anderson Abreu
    Anderson Abreu Member Posts: 559 ✭✭✭

    We're considering adding more keyboard shortcuts for frequently used features that now require more clicks, such as "Add parallel text" and "Interlinear".

    Wouldn't it be better, in addition to just creating keyboard shortcuts, to also have the option of creating shortcut icons in the “shortcut bar” or in the new top “toolbar” just as we do today with books and folders? I use the current “shortcut bar” a lot. 

     

    My previous suggestion was to use shortcuts in the top “Shortcut Bar” or in the new “Toolbar”:

    A suggestion for the new "toolbar".

    One very useful and practical setting would be to have the option to "Add to Quick Access Toolbar." This is an option available in Microsoft Office programs, and I use it a lot to keep frequently used settings at hand. You just need to right-click on a tool (for example, font color) and click on "Add to Quick Access Toolbar."

    I’ve attached a screenshot showing how these quick access shortcuts appear in Word (Note: my version is in Portuguese). All the icons within the yellow rectangle were added by me to the Quick Access Toolbar.

    Currently, Logos already has a similar option to pin shortcuts and folders to the top bar. It works with books and other resources, but it doesn’t work, for example, with the Interlinear and Auto Translation. Before, the Auto Translation was just one click away, but now it takes two clicks. Since I use it a lot, I’d like to have it pinned for immediate use. The same applies to other functions like Interlinear, Summarization, etc.

    I believe that having this "Add to Quick Access Toolbar" feature along with the new Toolbar would be very beneficial for all of us.

    ____________

    "... And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." (Ne 8.10)

  • Aaron Hamilton
    Aaron Hamilton Member, MVP Posts: 1,445

    Wouldn't it be better, in addition to just creating keyboard shortcuts, to also have the option of creating shortcut icons in the “shortcut bar” or in the new top “toolbar”

    This is a neat idea and in my view is similar to MJ's suggestion to have a "power user" tab. what if instead it was called a "quick access" or "shortcuts" tab? Users could be given the option to pin features/tools/shortcuts to this tab, customizing it to their current project/individual workflow, saving clicks, which appears to be the primary complaint about the new toolbar. It does sound like a lot of work, but might be worth it.

  • Aaron Hamilton
    Aaron Hamilton Member, MVP Posts: 1,445

    I imagine it's because I might want to “share” by printing or generating a file to be sent.

    And why does it have to be duplicated under tools? One location is enough. Two is unusual and excessive, IMO.

  • Mark Barnes (Logos)
    Mark Barnes (Logos) Administrator, Logos Employee Posts: 1,991

    Why is "Print/Export" listed both under the tools and the share tab? I feel like the share tab is more fitting, and I don't see why it needs to be duplicated.

    In our testing, about half of users looked for it under Tools, and about half looked for it under Share. There were generational differences (older users tended to look under "Tools") and OS differences (Apple users tended to look for it under "Share").

  • Anderson Abreu
    Anderson Abreu Member Posts: 559 ✭✭✭

    And why does it have to be duplicated under tools?

    I imagine that they're still going to sort out these “duplicates”. I think I read it somewhere in this post.

    ____________

    "... And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." (Ne 8.10)

  • Aaron Hamilton
    Aaron Hamilton Member, MVP Posts: 1,445

    In our testing, about half of users looked for it under Tools, and about half looked for it under Share. There were generational differences (older users tended to look under "Tools") and OS differences (Apple users tended to look for it under "Share").

    I don't find this surprising. Nonetheless, some credit should be given to a user's ability to learn its location based on where you decide to put it. Either location would be fine. However, if the decision has been made to create duplicates of the print button, I'll hold my objections in the future. Then again, why stop at the print button? I could think of a couple more...

  • Anderson Abreu
    Anderson Abreu Member Posts: 559 ✭✭✭

    This is a neat idea and in my view is similar to MJ's suggestion to have a "power user" tab. what if instead it was called a "quick access" or "shortcuts" tab? Users could be given the option to pin features/tools/shortcuts to this tab, customizing it to their current project/individual workflow, saving clicks, which appears to be the primary complaint about the new toolbar.

    I'm happy with any of these solutions in the sense that they allow me to have shortcut icons to add the tools I use most.

    It does sound like a lot of work, but might be worth it.

    Work? They're already having a hard time tinkering with something that was good and inventing something totally new. So, if that's the case. Let it be something well done and that satisfies the old users and “heavy users” and the beginners they want to reach with the new toolbar. 

    ____________

    "... And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." (Ne 8.10)

  • Donovan R. Palmer
    Donovan R. Palmer Member, MVP Posts: 2,768

    (Apple users tended to look for it under "Share").

    Us Apple users skew usage metrics all the time...

    I blame Steve Jobs. He relaunched Apple under the theme 'think different'. 

  • PL
    PL Member Posts: 2,158 ✭✭✭

    Mark,

    Can you please get rid of the "More" menu (with one menu option and an extra click) when there's clearly enough room to put "Share" or "Tool" in place of "More" instead?

    Thanks

    PL

  • Andrew Batishko
    Andrew Batishko Member, Community Manager, Logos Employee Posts: 5,459

    PL said:

    Can you please get rid of the "More" menu (with one menu option and an extra click) when there's clearly enough room to put "Share" or "Tool" in place of "More" instead?

    That sounds like a bug. Can you explain under what conditions this happens and please post a screen shot?

    Andrew Batishko | Logos software developer

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 33,096

    That sounds like a bug. Can you explain under what conditions this happens and please post a screen shot?

    I can reproduce this - on Mac - by just floating a window and adjusting the width so only the right-most menu is not showing

  • Andrew Batishko
    Andrew Batishko Member, Community Manager, Logos Employee Posts: 5,459

    I can reproduce this - on Mac - by just floating a window and adjusting the width so only the right-most menu is not showing

    Do you have a blue oval just after the Share button (when you are wide enough to see it) that says "New"?

    Andrew Batishko | Logos software developer

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 33,096

    I can reproduce this - on Mac - by just floating a window and adjusting the width so only the right-most menu is not showing

    Do you have a blue oval just after the Share button (when you are wide enough to see it) that says "New"?

    Yes

  • Andrew Batishko
    Andrew Batishko Member, Community Manager, Logos Employee Posts: 5,459

    I can reproduce this - on Mac - by just floating a window and adjusting the width so only the right-most menu is not showing

    Do you have a blue oval just after the Share button (when you are wide enough to see it) that says "New"?

    Yes

    Excellent. The "New" marker doesn't go in the "More" menu, but it looks like it still may be "occupying space" even though it's not visible.

    I've created a case to fix this bug.

    Andrew Batishko | Logos software developer

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 33,096

    Excellent. The "New" marker doesn't go in the "More" menu, but it looks like it still may be "occupying space" even though it's not visible.

    I've created a case to fix this bug.

    Sounds good

    Thanks Andrew

  • GaoLu
    GaoLu Member Posts: 3,510 ✭✭✭

    Viewing my interlinear digressed from 1 to 3 clicks.  Ick.  Please fix that 

  • Willie
    Willie Member Posts: 181 ✭✭

    Ali Pope said:

    So, try out the new toolbar and let us know what you think in this forum thread.

    I’m not a beta tester, so my feedback and requests reflected below are based only on what I have seen on the Webb app and read in this thread:

    (1)  I’m very glad that Logos primarily uses blue colors, but it is disappointing to see they apparently are planning to continue using the same extreme bright shade of blue in this toolbar and throughout the program that was originally introduced in software version 26.

    Within the new resource panel toolbar, this uncomfortably bright blue is used in the top toolbar’s active category tab underline and the secondary toolbar’s active category tab icons.  The accompanying blue highlights are also too bright. 

    This reading distraction related to the new toolbar which is also found in other parts of the resource panel could be resolved through a Feedback suggestion I’ve submitted which suggests adding an option for a user to change all UI elements currently using the extreme bright blue color back to the more comfortable blue color used at the time Logos 10 was initially released and prior to software version 26.

    https://feedback.logos.com/boards/logos-desktop-app/posts/add-an-option-to-change-all-ui-elements-currently-using-the-extreme-bright-blue-color-back-to-the-more-comfortable-blue-used-prior-to-version-26

    However, some users may wish to see no bolding or highlighting of active category tabs in the new toolbar regardless of what blue color shade is used.  For that purpose, I propose an additional option (perhaps in system settings) to turn off the blue bolding and highlighting of active category tabs.

    (2)  As others have already suggested in this thread, please allow an option for experienced users to create our own custom toolbar, removing functions we rarely use and adding those we frequently use, while maintaining a default toolbar with standard options for inexperienced users.

    I personally would prefer this option on the top toolbar with the ability to toggle back and forth between custom and standard toolbars.  However, if that is not possible or it is more logical to add this option to the secondary toolbar, then in order to reduce clutter, I would request the ability to temporarily hide the top toolbar while the custom secondary toolbar is open.

    In this circumstance, hiding the top toolbar would be especially important if no option is added to either change the extreme bright blue used for active category tabs to a more comfortable shade of blue or to turn off the blue bolding and highlighting of active category tabs. 

    (3)  In addition to (not instead of) the customizable toolbar options suggested above, adding additional keyboard shortcuts for frequently used features would be great.

    (4)  Please add an option within the system settings for resource panels to open by default with the secondary toolbar hidden.  I request this because I use custom layouts with various opened resource panels.  In order to comfortably read text, I will need to keep the secondary toolbar hidden within each resource panel and “show” it only when needed.  It would be annoying if I have to hide the secondary toolbar of each resource panel every time I open a custom layout or new resource.

    (5)  Regarding the up/down arrow button on the right side of the top toolbar used to temporarily show/hide the secondary toolbar, please mute or soften its grey color shade, or add an option to do this, so I may read the text below it with less distraction. 

    Grey is an excellent toolbar color and this button’s minimal design is fine, but my eyes see its bolded shade as slightly overpowering most of the other top toolbar elements (except for the much more overpowering extreme bright blue active category tab).  An alternative idea would be an option to remove this button and simply click in the empty space to temporarily show/hide the secondary toolbar.

    (6)  When the locator bar is open, it is currently hidden by clicking on the X tab on the right side of the bar.  In order to reduce clutter, please add an option to hide the X tab and close the locator bar by clicking anywhere in the open space within the bar.

     

     

  • Fabian
    Fabian Member Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭

    Hello

    Visually not bad. But I want you to remind a much more important thing. Inline Search. Still a complete mess!

    For example this recourse. 

    LLS:BBLSCHSNMNLXKN
    2023-07-26T19:37:53Z
    BBLSCHSNMNLXKN.logos4

    As you can see it has Indizes as follows.

    (I don't talk about the unfinished translation, this is mentioned in another thread).

    If I go to the Inline Search all comes up except the Headword (Eintrag) for it. 

    If I use the headword (Eintrag) I get at leas it is there.

    If I set the : colon, there is then no alphabetical list of the entries (to the letters I have written). No space after the colon.

    But the search would work.

    Now if I do a space after the colon: 

    I get a list but 100'000 miles away. There is no  with Abi to the Headword in the resource.

    It is fine to search from here to there, but make it only as a second option. First of all it should find what is in the resource and it fails completely. 

    In Accordance you have right away the list. 

    If you type more the non matching words disappear. 

    The same should work in a more complex search too. For example I type "Headword:" then the list comes up. I type the second argument, and again the list for the second argument comes up.

     

    In Logos I get autocomplete in German resouces for French. Unfortunately I have not made a screenshot. At least I typed a word and I got English Autocomplete suggestions and in French.

    Χριστὸς ἐν ὑμῖν, ἡ ἐλπὶς τῆς δόξης· 

  • Jack Caviness
    Jack Caviness MVP Posts: 13,583

    Ali Pope said:

    We will still reinstate the Cmd-G/Ctrl-G functionality,

    When?

  • Ali Pope
    Ali Pope Member, Logos Employee Posts: 1,821

    When?

    This will be included in the next beta that should be released later this week.

    Ali Pope | Logos Desktop and Mobile Program Manager

  • Mark Barnes (Logos)
    Mark Barnes (Logos) Administrator, Logos Employee Posts: 1,991

    Fabian said:

    Visually not bad. But I want you to remind a much more important thing. Inline Search. Still a complete mess!

    Search is designed to help you find terms that could occur anywhere in a resource. If you want to navigate to a particular article or headword, you're much better off using the reference box in the top left of the book. (In your screenshot, the reference box currently says "Abiel".)

  • John Goodman
    John Goodman Member Posts: 1,738 ✭✭✭

    Read aloud is broken. When I click it, it goes rapidly through to the end of the book flashing up the animations with no sound. This is on mac. I tried with 2 books.

    גַּם־חֹשֶׁךְ֮ לֹֽא־יַחְשִׁ֪יךְ מִ֫מֶּ֥ךָ וְ֭לַיְלָה כַּיּ֣וֹם יָאִ֑יר כַּ֝חֲשֵׁיכָ֗ה כָּאוֹרָֽה

  • John Goodman
    John Goodman Member Posts: 1,738 ✭✭✭

    Seems to be fixed in 37 beta 1 which only just installed. If its mentioned in the release notes I didn't see it.

    גַּם־חֹשֶׁךְ֮ לֹֽא־יַחְשִׁ֪יךְ מִ֫מֶּ֥ךָ וְ֭לַיְלָה כַּיּ֣וֹם יָאִ֑יר כַּ֝חֲשֵׁיכָ֗ה כָּאוֹרָֽה

  • Mark Barnes (Logos)
    Mark Barnes (Logos) Administrator, Logos Employee Posts: 1,991

    Read aloud is broken. When I click it, it goes rapidly through to the end of the book flashing up the animations with no sound. This is on mac. I tried with 2 books.

    We haven't fixed it yet, I'm afraid. It's an intermittent problem so it might return for you.

  • John Fidel
    John Fidel MVP Posts: 3,450

    If I collapse the resource toolbar, save layout, close Logos and reopen, the resource toolbar is no longer collapsed. I think it should stay how it was when last closed.

  • Paul
    Paul Member Posts: 44 ✭✭

    If I collapse the resource toolbar, save layout, close Logos and reopen, the resource toolbar is no longer collapsed. I think it should stay how it was when last closed.

    I second this. [Y]

    Also, clicking on the image of the book should give the contents of that current book and not a list of similar books. That's kind of like opening a physical book to look at the bibliography. There are times you want to do that, but it takes a back seat to seeing what the book in your hands contains. It should take extra clicks to get to the "change books" navigation instead of extra clicks to get to contents of current book.

    With the subscription toolbar collapsed, by default I want to see the contents of my current book. If I want similar books, that's what left/right arrow keys are for or I could do the multiple click route.

  • Jamie Ray
    Jamie Ray Member Posts: 16 ✭✭
  • Ali Pope
    Ali Pope Member, Logos Employee Posts: 1,821

    Jamie Ray said:

    My toolbar does not show on the NIV.

    Are you on Intel or Apple Silicon (M1, M2, M3, etc.) Mac?

    Ali Pope | Logos Desktop and Mobile Program Manager

  • Anderson Abreu
    Anderson Abreu Member Posts: 559 ✭✭✭

    Thank you for including in v.37.0 beta 2 the count of the number of hits in the inline search, as well as the graphs.
    _______
    However, what I notice is that this now requires more clicks than in the old inline search.

    To see the inline search count, I have to click once on the “Search” tab

    To send the result to the chart, I now have to click twice: once on the “Send to” tab and once on the “Charts” option.

    I can get used to it, but I don't like the extra difficulty that's been imposed.

    ____________

    "... And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." (Ne 8.10)