Dear Folk,
What are your favorite Revelation commentaries, and why?
Thanks,
Mike
Mine are Beale, G. K. (NIGTC), Mounce, R. (NICNT), and Schreiner, T. (BECNT). [Edit: Schreiner replaced Osborne in the BECNT, and I'd recommend Osborne as well, if you can get it.]
I like how they handle the text itself, esp. the Gk. ; Rev has a lot of variants and some of them are difficult…these do well in that area plus they deal with multiple views in a fair manner.
It would be important to note I have not used dozens of these so there may be better ones out there; these are the ones I've tried and found helpful.
My "go to" is Osborne BECNT 2002. I haven't read Schreiner's newer release in the same series. I find it intriguing that BECNT would release a 2nd Revelation volume when Osborne's is still in Best Commentaries top-3 of Revelation. I generally trust Schreiner, too bad Dr. Osborne passed so that we cannot get a dialogue between these 2 authors.
The Avenging of the Apostles and Prophets by Arthur Ogden. It lets Scripture interpret Scripture. Some label it preterist/early historical. It is not futuristic:
Yeah, Beale and Mounce are great.
@Michael A. Mnich it depends on the kind and level of commentary you are looking for. Aune is a mine of information about intertextuality and primary sources but hard to see the forest from the abundance of different leaves. One gets lost into the excess of secondary literature discussion. Beale is best for Jewish background, including the OT. Osborne (BECNT) is the clearest I have read in terms of "the forest." I have not used Schreiner's yet. Bauckham's Climax of Prophecy is also a solid, yet shorter, read.
» My "go to" is Osborne BECNT 2002. «
I agree…Osborne was excellent. I like Schreiner as well and referenced it since it is current. But I wouldn't hesitate to use Osborne alongside it.
If I may offer a historic—in many ways "foundational"—commentary on Revelation, let me suggest the Commentary on the Apocalypse by Andrew of Caesarea. This is a 6th-7th AD commentary that was the first fully accepted commentary on Revelation accepted in the Eastern churches. There was an earlier commentary by Oikoumenios, but this was seen as having heretical views. Andrew of Caesarea writes his commentary partly in response to Oikoumenios to correct what was seen as errant interpretation.
The commentary is significant because the book of Revelation was more slowly accepted in the East as opposed to the West. The writing of Andrew's commentary roughly coincides with the final universal acceptance of Revelation by the Eastern churches. Thus, for the East, Revelation becomes the only book in the canon that arrived with a commentary for interpretation at roughly the same time.
Thank you, Rick! I just finished up a book on this period, and the East.
Best of all, I own the commentary. Even better, ACT includes it, along with Oikoumenios. So, Logos-magic has a 3-way comparison!
Die Apokalypse des Johannes: Kommentar by Klaus Berger
1576 pages. Fruit of a lifetime of work. Simply reading the nearly 50 pages of Bibliography (containing also un-edited commentaries and non-catholic traditions) took my breath away.
BTW: Thanks to Logos/Verbum for carrying this resource!
I do recommend the translation of Andrew of Caesarea in the Fathers of the Church series over the one in the Ancient Christian Text series (though both series in general are excellent). But the translator in ACT misses some of the inherent liturgical language in the book of Revelation in his translation that is more accurately rendered by Dr. Constantinou in the Fathers of the Church volume.
do recommend the translation of Andrew of Caesarea in the Fathers of the Church series over the one in the Ancient Christian Text series (though both series in general are excellent). But the translator in ACT misses some of the inherent liturgical language in the book of Revelation in his translation that is more accurately rendered by Dr. Constantinou in the Fathers of the Church volume.
Yes, I noticed ACT was a bit laid back, though I can't speak to liturgical translation. I did want to see if the greek is available (I'm guessing not; likely Patrologia).
This is not my favorite at all, but it is was extremely helpful to me last time I preached through the book.
https://www.logos.com/product/2271/revelation-four-views?queryId=4b9bfb1bba67e24dbdb6baa30f885548
I had Osborne as a professor eons ago at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. I'll have to check out his commentary.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
I am still having issues with copying a bunch of verses. I understand that I go to Share —> Passage List, but then after that the passage list is blank and wants me to manually add verses. It also says I can drag and drop the verses, which I would love to if I could select the verses, but there again doesn't seem to be a…
Is the Logos for Mac designed and programed from the ground up to be a Mac program? Or is it Logos for windows with a program that allows it to run on Mac? If it is the latter, does Logos have plans for an excellent Logos designed and built for Mac?
A different kind of question. What diagonal screen size have you found to be adequate for running Logos Subscription Max under Windows 11 Pro? I currently have my 27" desktop and a Microsoft Surface Pro 8, but thinking of going for a regular laptop. There are a couple of Dell models that interest me, but primarily the…
How to I stockpile/purchase credits to use for future purchases?
MPS teaches that we should put a one volume commentary that covers the whole Bible in the short cuts bar. That way we can easily access the commentaries without opening a guide. We can then go from one to another. I have JFB in the short cuts bar. I have an English and a Greek text opened to I John 2:5. I clicked on JFB…
