nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

KJV VERSION OF THE HOLY BIBLE

Kenute P. Curry

I have two copies of the KJV version. The authorized version has the Reverse Interlinear and the other one doesn't. Shouldn't the other KJV version also have the Reverse Interlinear? Can someone please explain this to me?????

@Kyle G. Anderson @Bradley Grainger (Logos)

Find more posts tagged with

Files

Resources

Features

Desktop App

Comments

Kyle G. Anderson

The short answer is they're slightly different and we'd need to generate and sell new RVI data. I can't speak to why we initially made the decision to choose one over the other but it's not a simple matter of adding simply including the RVI with the 1769 edition.

Simon’s Brother

Just it muddy the waters further there is also a KJV resource supplied by WordSearch that some may have and it also does not have a RVI.
(Id: LLS: WS_0_1)

Kenute P. Curry

Thank you @Kyle G. Anderson. I just thought it was strange.

I do have the Wordsearch Edition @Simon’s Brother as well.