Is Rich Tatum Acting Pentecostal/Charismatic product manager?

and who is Pentecostal/Charismatic manager?

We've created this forum space for you to request and discuss Pentecostal/Charismatic* products, and for discussions related to that theology.
* The Pentecostal/Charismatic label really doesn't do justice to either products, authors, audience, theology, movements, or ways of "doing church" that falls under this label. From classical Pentecostals to the "fourth-wave," to neo-charismatics, it's a very big tent. If there was any one distinguishing mark common to all of us, it would, essentially, be continuationist theology (as opposed to cessationist).

Welcome, and feel free to join in the conversation!

Regards,

Rich Tatum Acting Pentecostal/Charismatic product manager

I am confused now, is Rich Tatum Acting Pentecostal/Charismatic product manager? why we did not hear anything from previous post until now??? Why there was no activity since last December? See those posts:

The only difficulty with Pentecost/Charismatic is that most of their distinctive writings would be after 1923, and therefore not public domain.

I believe the Pentecostal Product Manager left. That sounds like another difficulty.

I don't think they have a Pentecostal/Charismatic product manager, so don't get your hopes up any time soon. They had an acting one, but he hasn't posted here since Dec, and I saw someone else posted elsewhere that whoever they had in that post had left. I guess they'll probably be searching for a new one. But don't expect a Pentecostal base package until they have hired someone who can put one together.

and here is my post:

just want to confirm that Rich Tatum doesnt work for Logos anymore. On his facebook profile he was "PR/Marketing Specialist · Bellingham, Washington · Apr 8, 2013 to Jan 9, 2014" Hope Logos will find soon somebody else to hire

if Rich is active manager, who is Scott E. Mahle that he is answering on his behalf? I am very confused now...

if Rich is active manager, who is Scott E. Mahle that he is answering on his behalf? I am very confused now...

After browsing around, I see that Scott copied Rich' old reply without citing him.