Has Faithlife stated a policy on The Future, Discontinuing Books, Wokeness, Etc?

Hi Folks:
I'm not sure what sub forum this belongs on so I stuck it here. Tonight as I was getting ready to purchase some more Logos books to add to my collection that numbers thousands, I have a few things that bother me.
1. Am I correct that the books we have purchased are permanent, that is Logos or the publishers cannot break the license? The reason I ask is that if our country continues to slide downward, is it possible that some of the books I have in my collection could be 'banned' as hate speech and removed from my collections (as an example). Has Faithlife commented on that anywhere?
2. If a publisher decided to go in and revise its books to change things to what I would consider to be a less biblical position, I assume Logos would not have to update its books? Example: recently Eerdmans is a publisher that I have a lot of books with. They made some statements that seem to put traditional biblical beliefs on several issues in a bad light. If (just as an example) they decided to remove certain books from sale, we would get to keep our books right?
3. I purchased every new version of Bibleworks that came out for many years. I had hundreds of books also in my Wordsearch software and they are both gone now. Has Faithlife written or discussed anywhere what might happen to our licenses/software if they were ever to go out of business? (I've bought enough through them to keep them in business for a while lol but it is a worry).
I sometimes find myself purchasing a book I really like on Logos and also a hard copy that I can always have. I know we should never 'put all our eggs in one basket' but has Logos/Faithlife ever discussed any of these issues? I'm not interested in arguing politics. If you have any links or can point me to where I can find information on these questions (if available) I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks, Matthew
Comments
-
Stephen Friend said:
Am I correct that the books we have purchased are permanent, that is Logos or the publishers cannot break the license?
You are correct.
Stephen Friend said:some of the books I have in my collection could be 'banned' as hate speech and removed from my collections (as an example). Has Faithlife commented on that anywhere?
Aren't Christian books and hate speech mutually exclusive? No, Faithlife has not commented on that.
Stephen Friend said:If a publisher decided to go in and revise its books to change things to what I would consider to be a less biblical position, I assume Logos would not have to update its books?
What Logos sells is a particular edition in which they will not even correct typos that are in the printed edition without permission of the publisher. Changes in text are usually a new edition and have no effect on the previous edition(s),
Stephen Friend said:they decided to remove certain books from sale, we would get to keep our books right?
Just as you do with physical books - I've never heard of a publisher trying to get all copies of a book recalled although it would make a marvelous Monty Python skit.
Stephen Friend said:Has Faithlife written or discussed anywhere what might happen to our licenses/software if they were ever to go out of business? (I've bought enough through them to keep them in business for a while lol but it is a worry).
I have also never heard of a company issuing statements as to their plans should they go out of business - only the path forward when they are going out of business. Note that with WordSearch your resources were retained, being taken over by another company. With BibleWorks your resources were simply dropped. My parents had records that could only be played with a reed needle ... none of their children cared enough to maintain the old technology. On the other hand, I cared enough to maintain typewriter ribbons for typewriters from the 1920's. Its all a matter of your motivation and the market. I assume that Faithlife would be purchased by another company at least within my lifetime ... but then I've been retired for a decade.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Regarding 'hate speech': The definition is intentionally fluid. Tyrants typically hijack language first. We Yanks could be on the precipice of the 'Cole Porter' stage of Constitutional evolution ('anything goes').
Regarding stealth edits of electronic books: There is a recent precedent. While we know FaithLife isn't Amazon, some might remember when (now former) Baptist author Beth Moore decided to be Winston Smith For A Day and edit the Kindle version of a book she had written several years earlier. My understanding is the action was taken without any notification to current licensees.
macOS (Logos Pro - Beta) | Android 13 (Logos Stable)
0 -
Just to potentially throw gasoline on this fire, while it is normal for when the text changes in a work for there to be a new edition, there have been times where this practice has not been followed. The biggest example I can give in Logos is the text of the ESV bible. The publishers have updated/changed the base text over the decades and the Logos edition has made the same changes, which means that the text of my ESV bible now in Logos is not the same as it was about twenty years ago when I first got it in Libronix.
The Gospel is not ... a "new law," on the contrary, ... a "new life." - William Julius Mann
L8 Anglican, Lutheran and Orthodox Silver, Reformed Starter, Academic Essentials
L7 Lutheran Gold, Anglican Bronze
0 -
I have had many books edited and some books removed from my Amazon account. Amazon is supposed to offer a refund for the books removed, but that does not always happen. I purchase from Faithlife with the understanding that is likely to happen with them also at some point, and maybe that it already has happened.
One thing I have realized over time is that when a feared thing happens, that feared thing does not happen in isolation of other changes. Often the feared thing does occur, but I often don't care because so much else changed in my life at the same time. That feared thing is often irrelevant or no longer needed, and almost always insignificant in comparison to the other changes.
By the time Faithlife falls apart, basic access to wifi and control over our computers will likely be a bigger issue for us. Many of us will no longer have a way to access whatever is left in our Faithlife accounts. And we will be living different lives that revolve around a changed internet and different kinds of devices designed to connect to that changed internet.
God is in control. He does not burden us with knowledge of the future that we cannot bear, and we can trust our daddy to prepare us for that time without fully disclosing what is going to happen to us. The Bible warns us to live for today and not to hoard or worry about the future.
I have realized that I only need access to my Faithlife account when I am living a lifestyle that is like running on a hamster wheel. When I get thrown off my wheel and start living a less sheltered and caged life, I have all that I need for that time. God keeps me supplied with the tools for each task He assigns.
I just made another cross country move and my life is in upheaval and I am just watching God do what He does. He is setting me up for my next task. I have lost old tools and I am being gifted new ones. Nothing entrusted to us is ours. It all belongs to God and He will distribute those items and access and opportunities where He thinks they are most needed.
Pharaoh demanded that the Israelite slaves make bricks without supplying the needed straw. Jesus told us that His burden is light, and it is. His burden only feels heavy when we are trying to complete tasks that were never assigned to us. We can trust that the necessary tools will always be supplied for the tasks assigned.
0 -
Just for the (forum) record:
- The problem of digital books as been discussed, and discussed (and discussed). It's not a new issue for Logosians. Some have even died already, without having seen the Logos 'resurrection'.
- Bob (head of the company) has also commented multiple times (usually with lengthy writeups). His basic point: Faithlife is sufficiently large, that any unforeseen crash, would be covered by another interested party (the assets have significant value).
- The company itself is unbelievable reluctant to take many chances. They do try this and that. But they don't appear to risk too much. I think Bob learned the almost-went-bankrupt lesson decades back. I clearly remember the Christmas Eve masacre (financially unloaded employees quickly, to put it nicely).
- Now, book write-overs (re-issueing books by the publisher, and Faithlife writing over a customer's licensed book) ... that's an open issue (as far as I know). It's why, if this is a risk to a customer, 2 computers work great. One to download. The other off-line.
But my opinion, in terms of 'theological risk', a next-owner is the main risk. Bob and the other top leaders have been quite adept at theologically calming the waters (internal and external). But a new owner would be a new equation. It's like getting new neighbors ... that own your house.
0 -
Hello everyone,
I appreciate the insights shared in this discussion and wanted to bring attention to some recent developments at Faithlife that might further contextualize our concerns.
-
Leadership Change: As some of you might already know, there has been a significant leadership change at Faithlife. Co-founder Bob Pritchett has transitioned to the role of Executive Chairman, and Vik Rajagopal has been appointed as the new CEO. Moreover, the majority shares of Faithlife are now owned by Cove Hill Partners (Information source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithlife_Corporation, and https://www.glassdoor.com/Overview/Working-at-Faithlife-EI_IE888280.11,20.htmr).
-
Permanency of Licenses: This discussion has raised valid points regarding the permanency of our licenses, especially in light of the recent leadership change. It's comforting to know that our books are stored locally, as mentioned in a previous discussion on this forum3.
-
Contingency Plans: The concerns regarding what might happen to our libraries and licenses if Faithlife were to face operational challenges are indeed pertinent. It's a reality we've seen with other platforms in the past, and having a clear understanding of Faithlife's contingency plans would be reassuring.
-
Engagement with the User Community: The engagement and communication between Faithlife and the user community are crucial, especially during times of change. It would be beneficial to have more transparent and open communication regarding any strategic shifts that might impact us as users.
-
Diversifying Platforms: Given the evolving nature of digital platforms, it might be wise to consider diversifying our digital libraries across different platforms such as Kindle and Accordance. This could provide a level of security and flexibility, ensuring continuous access to our resources regardless of the changes in a single platform.
-
Future Direction: Understanding the strategic direction Faithlife and Logos will be taking under the new leadership would also help in alleviating some concerns. Open discussions and official communications from Faithlife on this would be much appreciated.
This is a time of change, and having clarity on these aspects can help us make informed decisions regarding our investments in digital resources. I am keen to hear your thoughts on these matters and any additional information or insights you might have come across.
Thank you for engaging in this important discussion.
0 -
-
Hello everyone,
I appreciate the insights shared in this discussion and wanted to bring attention to some recent developments at Faithlife that might further contextualize our concerns.
-
Leadership Change: As some of you might already know, there has been a significant leadership change at Faithlife. Co-founder Bob Pritchett has transitioned to the role of Executive Chairman, and Vik Rajagopal has been appointed as the new CEO. Moreover, the majority shares of Faithlife are now owned by Cove Hill Partners (Information source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithlife_Corporation, and https://www.glassdoor.com/Overview/Working-at-Faithlife-EI_IE888280.11,20.htmr).
-
Permanency of Licenses: This discussion has raised valid points regarding the permanency of our licenses, especially in light of the recent leadership change. It's comforting to know that our books are stored locally, as mentioned in a previous discussion on this forum3.
-
Contingency Plans: The concerns regarding what might happen to our libraries and licenses if Faithlife were to face operational challenges are indeed pertinent. It's a reality we've seen with other platforms in the past, and having a clear understanding of Faithlife's contingency plans would be reassuring.
-
Engagement with the User Community: The engagement and communication between Faithlife and the user community are crucial, especially during times of change. It would be beneficial to have more transparent and open communication regarding any strategic shifts that might impact us as users.
-
Diversifying Platforms: Given the evolving nature of digital platforms, it might be wise to consider diversifying our digital libraries across different platforms such as Kindle and Accordance. This could provide a level of security and flexibility, ensuring continuous access to our resources regardless of the changes in a single platform.
-
Future Direction: Understanding the strategic direction Faithlife and Logos will be taking under the new leadership would also help in alleviating some concerns. Open discussions and official communications from Faithlife on this would be much appreciated.
This is a time of change, and having clarity on these aspects can help us make informed decisions regarding our investments in digital resources. I am keen to hear your thoughts on these matters and any additional information or insights you might have come across.
Thank you for engaging in this important discussion.
0 -
-
Paul said:
This is a time of change, and having clarity on these aspects can help us make informed decisions regarding our investments in digital resources. I am keen to hear your thoughts on these matters and any additional information or insights you might have come across.I've always maintained multiple platforms, with the assumption that digital typically has a short half-life, and small businesses, even shorter. Your wiki reference would be good to be confirmed; Cove Hill Partners doesn't show Faithlife. But common-sense would dictate that original owners would want some type of buyout, to include managerial influence.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
This why it is essential to have a non-internet backup source, i.e. 4-5 TB stand alone with no access except when you back it up. Trust no company to protect your rights or property, they are all subject to corruption.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:
This why it is essential to have a non-internet backup source,
In the days of Libronix, this was possible. All you needed was the code to unlock your resources. Libronix could be installed with no Internet connection. I don't remember exactly when this disappeared, but it was sometime after Logos 4 was released. Although you can run Logos without the Internet, you have to connect to their servers for verification (I guess). I don't fault Logos for this change. It was probably necessary to stop multiple people from accessing the same account, but it still creates a concern.
If Logos ever goes the way of multiple other bible study platforms (e.g. BibleWorks), then Logos will only work on computers where it is currently installed. Once that computer dies, so does the access to my library.
0 -
Whyndell Grizzard said:
they are all subject to corruption.
As are all backup devices as one learns when testing requirements to be up and running within 24 hours should your computer site be destroyed.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Paul said:
It's comforting to know that our books are stored locally,
The trend now is for all software to be sold as "services" rather than a product which you "own". You never have full control over any digitally encrypted content, whether it be music, video, or books. Whoever holds the encryption keys is in control. If and when the government decrees a book to be illegal, all companies will be required to comply or suffer the consequences.
It is a false comfort to have digitally encrypted resources stored locally, unless the ability to decrypt and use them is also controlled locally. With Logos it is not. Previous versions (Libronix 3, which I still use occasionally on Windows 7) had the ability to save an activation backup file, which could then be used to reinstall offline when necessary. That ability is now gone, so the end user does not truly "own" anything, but must request permission each time to access each resource.
Paul said:it might be wise to consider diversifying our digital libraries across different platforms such as Kindle and Accordance
I like my Kindle, but I do not trust Amazon at all to protect my legal rights should my books become decreed as "hate speech". Accordance might be around in the future. Who knows? But I certainly would not recommend anyone invest money into what appears to be a rapidly sinking ship.
0 -
The reviews on Glassdoor for Faithlife, spanning from November 2022 to October 2023, exhibit a mix of praise and criticism, with a notable lean towards negative feedback. Below is a summary of the reviews:
Positive Aspects:
- Mission Driven: Employees value the company’s mission of serving the church community and facilitating the study of religious texts.
- Flexible Work Environment: Mentioned frequently is the flexibility in working hours, with some also appreciating the permanent work-from-home option.
- Collegial Atmosphere: Several reviews cite good working relationships with colleagues and supervisors as a positive aspect.
- Software Quality: The quality and usefulness of Faithlife’s software, especially the Logos Bible Software, was acknowledged.
Negative Aspects:
- Change in Culture and Leadership: The transition in leadership, with the founder/CEO stepping down and a former Amazon executive stepping in, is seen as a catalyst for a decline in company culture and employee morale.
- Financial and Compensation Concerns: Many employees find the pay below market standards, with meager annual raises, no bonus structure, and a lack of transparency in salary structures.
- Human Resources and Management Issues: The HR department is criticized for being recently established and not addressing harassment or other workplace issues effectively. There's a call for better listening and responsiveness from management.
- Lack of Advancement Opportunities: Employees express frustration over limited career advancement opportunities, and when available, they come without significant pay increases.
- Product Sunsetting and Layoffs: The discontinuation of certain products and subsequent layoffs were seen as poorly communicated and executed, leading to further distrust in management.
- Diversity and Inclusion: There’s a strong sentiment about the lack of diversity and inclusion, with instances of harassment mentioned.
- Inter-departmental Relations: An adversarial relationship among different departments, favoritism, and lack of organizational cohesion were highlighted.
- Communications and Transparency: The lack of transparency from executive leadership, particularly around the financial health of the company and organizational changes, is a recurring complaint.
The concerns overshadow the positive aspects, and many reviewers express a desire for better management practices, improved communication, and a return to a more inclusive and employee-friendly culture.
-----
Subject: Request for Clarity and Assurance Regarding Faithlife's Commitment to Users and Long-Term Vision
Dear Faithlife Management,
I am writing as a long-term user and supporter of the Logos Bible Software, which has significantly aided my biblical studies and spiritual growth over the years. However, recent reviews and internal feedback shared on platforms like Glassdoor concerning changes within Faithlife have raised concerns among the user community, including myself.
The transition in leadership and the apparent shift in company culture, especially with the involvement of private equity, has triggered worries about the future of Logos and other Faithlife products. There is a genuine concern about the potential focus pivoting solely towards financial performance, which might overlook the essence of customer relationships and loyalty that have been a hallmark of Faithlife.
The fear of being left unsupported in the event of a liquidity crisis, a scenario not uncommon in PE-run organizations, is real. As users who have invested time, resources, and trust in Logos, we seek assurance that our investment is secure and will continue to yield spiritual and educational benefits in the long term.
We believe that the long-term survival and success of Faithlife are intricately linked to a loyal customer base and a dedicated employee pool who truly understand the cultural and spiritual DNA encapsulated in the Logos software. Hence, it's imperative that the corporate vision remains aligned with the foundational values that have made Logos a cherished resource among the faith community.
We request clear communication from Faithlife management regarding the steps being taken to ensure the continuous support, development, and enhancement of Logos, even amidst organizational changes. We are hopeful that the core mission of serving the church community and fostering biblical studies will remain a priority, irrespective of the financial imperatives.
Your commitment to maintaining a balance between financial sustainability and unwavering support to the user community will not only instill confidence among us but will also contribute significantly to the long-term viability and success of Faithlife and its offerings.
We look forward to a reassuring response and a continued enriching relationship with Faithlife and the Logos software.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
SIncerely.
Paul
0 -
Paul said:
Subject: Request for Clarity and Assurance Regarding Faithlife's Commitment to Users and Long-Term Vision
Dear Faithlife Management,
I am writing as a long-term user and supporter of the Logos Bible Software, which has significantly aided my biblical studies and spiritual growth over the years. However, recent reviews and internal feedback shared on platforms like Glassdoor concerning changes within Faithlife have raised concerns among the user community, including myself.
The transition in leadership and the apparent shift in company culture, especially with the involvement of private equity, has triggered worries about the future of Logos and other Faithlife products. There is a genuine concern about the potential focus pivoting solely towards financial performance, which might overlook the essence of customer relationships and loyalty that have been a hallmark of Faithlife.
The fear of being left unsupported in the event of a liquidity crisis, a scenario not uncommon in PE-run organizations, is real. As users who have invested time, resources, and trust in Logos, we seek assurance that our investment is secure and will continue to yield spiritual and educational benefits in the long term.
We believe that the long-term survival and success of Faithlife are intricately linked to a loyal customer base and a dedicated employee pool who truly understand the cultural and spiritual DNA encapsulated in the Logos software. Hence, it's imperative that the corporate vision remains aligned with the foundational values that have made Logos a cherished resource among the faith community.
We request clear communication from Faithlife management regarding the steps being taken to ensure the continuous support, development, and enhancement of Logos, even amidst organizational changes. We are hopeful that the core mission of serving the church community and fostering biblical studies will remain a priority, irrespective of the financial imperatives.
Your commitment to maintaining a balance between financial sustainability and unwavering support to the user community will not only instill confidence among us but will also contribute significantly to the long-term viability and success of Faithlife and its offerings.
We look forward to a reassuring response and a continued enriching relationship with Faithlife and the Logos software.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
SIncerely.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I'm not sure if you have also sent that directly to Faithlife Management through email or snail mail, but if you want them to see it, I would recommend that you do.
They are not likely to notice a letter addressed to them embedded in a recently revived thread from 2022.
0 -
Rosie Perera said:
They are not likely to notice a letter addressed to them embedded in a recently revived thread from 2022.
Agree.
But the issues Paul brings up are concerning. I admit over the years, the reality of 'business' and 'digital' were there; just not up front. Bob was too dependable! I feel a lot like the time Home Depot lost their customer data (years back) ... we immediately wondered whether the place was still ok to shop there. Obviously, this isn't losing customer data; it's potentially losing everything purchased for almost 20 years. Smiling lopsided.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
DMB said:Paul said:
This is a time of change, and having clarity on these aspects can help us make informed decisions regarding our investments in digital resources. I am keen to hear your thoughts on these matters and any additional information or insights you might have come across.I've always maintained multiple platforms, with the assumption that digital typically has a short half-life, and small businesses, even shorter. Your wiki reference would be good to be confirmed; Cove Hill Partners doesn't show Faithlife. But common-sense would dictate that original owners would want some type of buyout, to include managerial influence.
As a former employee (who was around during the purchase and after), I can confirm the ownership/purchase statements on the Wikipedia page and the Glassdoor reviews are correct. The majority owner of Logos is Cove Hill, despite it not being listed on Cove Hills website.
0 -
So Logos/Faithlife has been quietly sold off to an investment firm? Looks like it is a nonreligious firm? Has the Pritchette family quietly exited the ownership?
How come there were no announcements on such big changes (even though as a privately-held company they're not obligated to tell customers anything)?
0 -
PL said:
How come there were no announcements on such big changes (even though as a privately-held company they're not obligated to tell customers anything)?
Maybe because I already altered my book investment strategy! Moved OL forward, and cut monographs and similar.
Regarding 'Christian', I don't get too wound up. Private equity means performance. Financial demands. Though the PE says they emphasize long term. We shall see.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
I knew I should’ve bought a house instead 😩
DAL
0 -
PL said:
So Logos/Faithlife has been quietly sold off to an investment firm?
Given how anxious some users on the forum are, I would suspect that Faithlife feared the reaction of their users reading more into the change than it necessarily deserved. There have been a number of signs that Logos needed a change in focus in on quality (bug squashing) and user-oriented design from a more first in the industry to try ... approach. I think that the change in management, management style, and (partial) ownership has gone remarkably smoothly. For myself, it eases any long-term concerns I may have had about an "after Bob" Faithlife.
PS. If Logos ever issues a statement on "wokeness" I promise to gag. The pop use of the term is totally meaningless - ask anyone exactly what they mean by "wokeness" and you'll find a disciple of the Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
PL said:
So Logos/Faithlife has been quietly sold off to an investment firm? Looks like it is a nonreligious firm? Has the Pritchette family quietly exited the ownership?
How come there were no announcements on such big changes (even though as a privately-held company they're not obligated to tell customers anything)?
Wow, I had not noticed this in Paul's earlier post:
Paul said:Moreover, the majority shares of Faithlife are now owned by Cove Hill Partners (Information source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithlife_Corporation, and https://www.glassdoor.com/Overview/Working-at-Faithlife-EI_IE888280.11,20.htmr).
That is sad. I used to be a shareholder, one of the first outside of Bob Pritchett's immediate family. I knew Bob and his co-founder Kiernon from Microsoft and was invited in as a shareholder at the ground floor, even before Bob & Kiernon left Microsoft. Was happy to have helped launch Logos into what it became under Bob's leadership. I sold my shares back to the company finally in 2014, since Logos seemed to be doing very well and didn't need my investment anymore, and I didn't have the time nor interest in following its decision making and future direction anymore. I used to go to shareholder meetings in person in Bellingham, and it was fun to hear about things from the inside. I didn't own enough shares to influence the direction of the company, though Bob did take my input seriously, at least he sounded interested. He never could keep up with all my bug reporting, though!
Anyway, all that to say, I'm sad that most of the shares are now owned by a private equity firm. None of the team members seem to be names I recognize as being Pritchett family members or other original Logos shareholders.
0 -
DAL said:
I knew I should’ve bought a house instead 😩
Yes, but then you have Jesus' warning about improper house building. All touch and go.
I wonder if (new) Expansion Libraries are out the window this year ... and what else.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
DMB said:DAL said:
I knew I should’ve bought a house instead 😩
Yes, but then you have Jesus' warning about improper house building. All touch and go.
I wonder if (new) Expansion Libraries are out the window this year ... and what else.
Yes, I won’t need Logos in heaven anyway. And yes, Expansions might not be offered this time around. The Spanish department stopped offering them in Logos 9.
Anyway, hopefully, Logos will continue until the day I die and beyond 🙏
DAL
0 -
The non-communication and secrecy around this monumental change in company ownership is a huge disappointment and a significant deviation from common courtesy and previous practice of the former management team.
CEO Vik ~ Do you care to comment, if you ever visit the forums?
0 -
PL said:
The non-communication and secrecy around this monumental change in company ownership
I think you're looking at crickets. And probably not by accident (though the old rule was 3-4 pages of the forum on fire, first).
And maybe the answer is indeed, FL (or Logos or whatever the company is named now; what a commentary) has changed. The irony is the 4 examples we have of recent ownership change in Bible platforms have all dribbled out poorly. Maybe the Bible software heyday is over, and it's just a matter of last-man-standing.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:PL said:
So Logos/Faithlife has been quietly sold off to an investment firm?
Given how anxious some users on the forum are, I would suspect that Faithlife feared the reaction of their users reading more into the change than it necessarily deserved. There have been a number of signs that Logos needed a change in focus in on quality (bug squashing) and user-oriented design from a more first in the industry to try ... approach. I think that the change in management, management style, and (partial) ownership has gone remarkably smoothly. For myself, it eases any long-term concerns I may have had about an "after Bob" Faithlife.
[Y] Logos has been around for about 32 years so a change was bound to happen sooner or later. So far I agree with MJ that it has gone remarkably smoothly.
0 -
I remember when Accordance accidentally sent an email saying something along these lines: “Jump before the ship sinks!” They were referring to Logos going out of business and they even offered “Crossover” specials 😂 The ironic part is that now both seem to be sinking and nobody in their leadership roles has the guts to step out and say anything about it! A strikingly similar conversation is going on at the Accordance forum also!
Borrowing a little from DMB, “Who will be the last man standing?” I sure hope is Logos!
DAL
0 -
Given the amount of money many users have invested in their library, some concern is understandable.
0 -
Kathleen Marie said:
I have had many books edited and some books removed from my Amazon account. Amazon is supposed to offer a refund for the books removed, but that does not always happen.
Since I had originally posted this question, I have been doing 2 things on a monthly basis.
1. With Amazon there are ways to make a backup of the books. Some may have an issue with the method used to decrypt and make the backups but since I paid for the books and i would never share them with others I don't personally have a problem with it. I can easily foresee a day when conservative Christian books get dropped on Amazon. (I back them up as pdf's and other formats).
2. With Logos I have spent way, way to much on books. What I have been doing with Logos is I created a VM (Virtual Machine) in Windows (need the Pro version) with just Logos installed. Every month I update the books and software on it. It is very easy to make a backup/ copy of the VM. So in the event that Logos were to cease to exist, I can run the virtual machine in whatever version of Windows comes along. I can still run Windows 3.1 from the early 90's in a VM so I believe it is likely that I'll be able to run at least a VM for the remainder of my life (probably less than 20 years) if needed.
Matthew
0 -
Matthew Friend said:
I can run the virtual machine in whatever version of Windows comes along
That sounds good, but if the activation process is tied to hardware ID such as the processor, you will lose it if you ever need to get a new computer. Virtualization technology does not virtualize or hide processor ID or TPM as far as I know.
I do not know about Logos, but other software activation processes such as Microsofts use a combination of hardware ID's. Some, but not all can be virtualized.
Have you tested moving the VM to a different computer?
0 -
There's a lot going on in this thread, but I'll do my best to respond to what I see as the main points.
Firstly, I understand the concern. Like many of the staff at Logos, I'm a customer too. Sometimes, when I'm asked why I joined Logos, I say, "To protect my investment!". And it's only partly a joke!
Any company can go out of business, and in a digital world, that has more implications than it would otherwise. No one can predict the future, but Logos is in a good place. Bob Pritchett, while he was CEO, said:
Bob Pritchett said:I'm working hard to make sure we don't go out of business. :-)
But if we do, Mitchell is right: Another company/group would find our very large customer base to be worth maintaining / buying rights to the code / licenses / etc.
Worst case, some open-source project / team would probably emerge to hack the DRM and support the system moving forward -- as long as their was a substantial user base. Your biggest risk would be a product with a small customer base; large customer bases seem to survive and support themselves even if the entire business infrastructure disappears. It's hard to think of any 20th century brand / technology / platform that doesn't have a community collecting / supporting / documenting it.
That is even more true today, IMO.
Bob stepped down as CEO in 2022, and Vik, the new CEO, has been transparent about recent major strategy changes, which have basically been a refocusing on Logos Bible Software and withdrawing from church management and related areas. That's good news for Logos users, IMO.
With regard to content, we work very hard to do what's right for our customers. Often customers want us to provide free updates to books they purchased in the past. Occasionally, and maybe only hypothetically, it seems as though some may want the opposite. If so, it will be impossible to please everyone, although we will try!
As you might expect, the ownership of a company the size of Logos is not in the hands of any one individual (we have hundreds of employees). I don't know the details of exactly who owns how much, and I can honestly say it doesn't impact my day-to-day work – and it's my job to keep making our apps better and better.
One of the things that's always impressed me about Logos is that it feels both like a ministry AND a business. That is, the vast majority of the staff are motivated by our mission of growing the church in the light of the Bible. And yet, at the same time, Logos is run on a sound financial footing to ensure we can continue to invest in growing the platform and improving the way we can serve Christians around the world.
For what it's worth, as I moved from the "outside" to the "inside" 18 months ago, my opinion and confidence in the company has gone up, not down. I'm confident my investment is in good hands, and I'm confident yours is too.
0 -
Thank you Mark for this...I know you didn't have to say (write) anything. Which to me indicates how much Logos does care.
I am curious about one thing, just how big is the Logos customer base referred to in Bob's quote?
Peace and all good.
KSC
“Let us begin, brothers, to serve the Lord God, for up until now we have done little or nothing.” St. Francis of Assisi
0 -
Mark, thanks for weighing in here.
There are several questions/concerns raised in this thread and I’d like to briefly share my thoughts.
First of all, I appreciate how much you all care about Logos – the product as well as the company. As Mark noted, and as I have flagged here a few times, one of the changes I’ve made in my two years as CEO has been to reemphasize and reinvest in our core products – namely Logos Bible Software. We have gone so far as to rebrand ourselves in the market as Logos, signifying a singular focus on better, deeper Bible study. At the same time, we are a for-profit software company. That means we (and I) need to balance our desire to live into our mission while also maintaining a healthy business. And I am pleased by the manner in which we are doing just that. Logos 10 is shaping up to be our most successful release ever, and we are currently at all-time highs in terms of product usage, customer engagement, and other metrics we track. None of you should be concerned about our viability and/or the security of your digital libraries – we are in it for the long haul.
Along those lines, our team is hard at work in building the next version of Logos, portions of which we intend to share with our users in the first half of next year. There are several exciting things in the hopper, and I look forward to seeking your feedback on those new features as they are completed and shipped.
To clarify on Bob – when I stepped in as CEO two years ago, Bob transitioned to a full-time position on our Board of Directors. He continues to serve as a Board member, and I (virtually) saw him just last week at our most recent Board meeting. He remains involved in the business and is an ongoing advocate for our customers and the overall user experience with Logos.
Please note I read the forums frequently, but the best way to reach me is via email – vik@logos.com.
Vik
0 -
Dear Vik,
Thank you for your timely response, much appreciated!
Anything you could share about this change in ownership to the investment firm? e.g. when did it happen, do they have other religious holdings in their portfolio, or anything else you're at liberty to share?
0 -
Vik Rajagopal said:
There are several questions/concerns raised in this thread and I’d like to briefly share my thoughts.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. That has gone a long way in helping many jittery customers in the past. It is concerning when you invest so much. But I also know that no company lasts forever. I keep reminding myself that the investment I have made has transformed my study and Christian life. And there can be no value put on that.
0 -
Matthew Friend said:
2. With Logos I have spent way, way to much on books. What I have been doing with Logos is I created a VM....
An easier way to backup Logos books is this one: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/124007.aspx . Using calibre you can convert the Word file to any ebook format. Obviously, this way you only keep the text of the book, no tagging etc.
(As this was originally posted by Mark, it's probably okay for me to remind people of this [:P] )
0 -
I appreciate the personal response, and the level of accessibility posting your email address provides. It's very reminiscent of something Bob might do. Which I respect, and appreciate. It's a warm comforting blanket in a thread that was a bit alarming.Vik Rajagopal said:Mark, thanks for weighing in here.
There are several questions/concerns raised in this thread and I’d like to briefly share my thoughts.
First of all, I appreciate how much you all care about Logos – the product as well as the company. As Mark noted, and as I have flagged here a few times, one of the changes I’ve made in my two years as CEO has been to reemphasize and reinvest in our core products – namely Logos Bible Software. We have gone so far as to rebrand ourselves in the market as Logos, signifying a singular focus on better, deeper Bible study. At the same time, we are a for-profit software company. That means we (and I) need to balance our desire to live into our mission while also maintaining a healthy business. And I am pleased by the manner in which we are doing just that. Logos 10 is shaping up to be our most successful release ever, and we are currently at all-time highs in terms of product usage, customer engagement, and other metrics we track. None of you should be concerned about our viability and/or the security of your digital libraries – we are in it for the long haul.
Along those lines, our team is hard at work in building the next version of Logos, portions of which we intend to share with our users in the first half of next year. There are several exciting things in the hopper, and I look forward to seeking your feedback on those new features as they are completed and shipped.
To clarify on Bob – when I stepped in as CEO two years ago, Bob transitioned to a full-time position on our Board of Directors. He continues to serve as a Board member, and I (virtually) saw him just last week at our most recent Board meeting. He remains involved in the business and is an ongoing advocate for our customers and the overall user experience with Logos.
Please note I read the forums frequently, but the best way to reach me is via email – vik@logos.com.
Vik
Honestly, my biggest concern was your time at Symantec - Norton Antivirus was the bane of my existence in the 90s [:P]. It tried to do too much, and maybe should have had higher minimum system requirements. It pushed me thoroughly into the McAfee camp (for whom I eventually beta tested, and had my review published in the 2000s RE the college I worked for changing direction RE their antiviral product).
But it seems that won't be the issue here as evidenced by the recent refocusing.
I initially wasn't a fan of that. Because of the inconvenience related to rebuilding the church website, and transitioning the giving platform. But I'm happy with what we have now, and I think it's a healthy move for Logos overall. I've been with Logos for a long long time. I hope to continue with Logos for the duration of my life and ministry.L2 lvl4 (...) WORDsearch, all the way through L10,
0 -
When I first started reading this thread.. welll..... it was not fun. But then Mark Barnes said what he did. I feel better.
Thanks Mark.
I just wonder if Faithlife is looking for a "white horse"?
xn = Christan man=man -- Acts 11:26 "....and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch".
Barney Fife is my hero! He only uses an abacus with 14 rows!
0 -
DAL said:
Yep! It sure brings a little bit of relief
And that's good.
But actually, nothing was said that was anything new ... the private equity folks have majority ownership, Mark and Vik need to produce the goods, and the board looks on. Given the PE is 'long-term' but reports high-end results, basically we're looking at whether FL (Logos?) can pull off industry consolidation in the next 5 years or so. Else. I'd have to assume the universities are the market to do that. Churches are catch as catch can.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
I am reassured by statements from Vik and Mark. Thanks.
0 -
Vik Rajagopal said:
To clarify on Bob – when I stepped in as CEO two years ago, Bob transitioned to a full-time position on our Board of Directors. He continues to serve as a Board member, and I (virtually) saw him just last week at our most recent Board meeting. He remains involved in the business and is an ongoing advocate for our customers and the overall user experience with Logos.
Please note I read the forums frequently, but the best way to reach me is via email – vik@logos.com.
Bravo! One of the things that has made me feel like a stockholder of Logos over the years is the approachability and transparency of the leadership. I exchanged emails with Bob on more than one occasion, which gave me not only excitement about the future strategy of the company, but the culture.
Sadly, as productive as this is, not all Bible software platforms are operating this way. One in particular has recently chosen to depart from this level of transparency by having a single agent as the face of the company and has even restructured their forums, which deliberate or not, provides no clear place for ‘general’ discussions about the platform. This has created a perfect storm of concern as they have suffered a number of quality assurance issues and missed multiple development goals.
Time will tell, but this is archaic and certainly not in keeping with the enthusiastic support that was present years ago when technology began to allow us to do things we had never been able to do before in study of the texts and research.
Stay the course Logos. We need this platform more than ever!
0 -
Donovan R. Palmer said:Vik Rajagopal said:
To clarify on Bob – when I stepped in as CEO two years ago, Bob transitioned to a full-time position on our Board of Directors. He continues to serve as a Board member, and I (virtually) saw him just last week at our most recent Board meeting. He remains involved in the business and is an ongoing advocate for our customers and the overall user experience with Logos.
Please note I read the forums frequently, but the best way to reach me is via email – vik@logos.com.
Bravo! One of the things that has made me feel like a stockholder of Logos over the years is the approachability and transparency of the leadership. I exchanged emails with Bob on more than one occasion, which gave me not only excitement about the future strategy of the company, but the culture.
Sadly, as productive as this is, not all Bible software platforms are operating this way. One in particular has recently chosen to depart from this level of transparency by having a single agent as the face of the company and has even restructured their forums, which deliberate or not, provides no clear place for ‘general’ discussions about the platform. This has created a perfect storm of concern as they have suffered a number of quality assurance issues and missed multiple development goals.
Time will tell, but this is archaic and certainly not in keeping with the enthusiastic support that was present years ago when technology began to allow us to do things we had never been able to do before in study of the texts and research.
Stay the course Logos. We need this platform more than ever!
Unfortunately, the forum user who is now “the face“ of the other company has adopted a ”Cancel culture” approach to anything! If he doesn’t like your posts he “hides” them, even if you are posting genuine concerns! That just shows the lack of ethical transparency they now have or lack. No more purchasing from Accordance for me.
I’m glad I have invested in Logos and if Logos ends up being the only software in the planet, I’d rather invest on it than the other guys who seems to be running on an empty gas tank lately.
DAL
0 -
"Unfortunately, the forum user who is now “the face“ of the other company has adopted a ”Cancel culture” approach to anything! If he doesn’t like your posts he “hides” them, even if you are posting genuine concerns! That just shows the lack of ethical transparency they now have or lack. No more purchasing from Accordance for me.
I’m glad I have invested in Logos and if Logos ends up being the only software in the planet, I’d rather invest on it than the other guys who seems to be running on an empty gas tank lately."
I was a dual Logos/Accordance guy for years. But I officially stopped building a bigger library in Accordance for good in 2022 for reasons mentioned here. I'm exclusively investing in Logos since 2022. Well said.
_If I can add a practical exhortation for some people (mainly for those who can benefit from a change of perspective):
There's probably not a resource in my Logos Library in which I've read in total. For those of you who are really, really worried about all this, just buy physical copies of your dearest texts (which is much smaller than you probably realize). Second, in my studies and notes, I am constantly adding footnotes, quotations, etc. outside of logos (google docs (google cloud) --> word, txt.file, and pdf stored into harddrive). And if you aren't backing up your study notes (which includes your footnotes, quotations, etc.), that's your problem, not Logos. I believe Logos gives us an incredible tool to study the Bible more efficiently. I am a huge fan of what Logos in doing. And from personal experience being involved in the tech world, tech has taught me to always adapt to change. Your paranoia is only good with what you do with it (Andrew Grove's definition of paranoia).
Logos is a tool, and I (and should you) always treat it as such.
What do I prize more than Logos? The studies I developed with the help of Logos.
It's those studies I'm passionate about preserving in various online and physical databases. It's those studies that I get very protective over. Again, Logos is only a tool. Logos should not be the database of everything precious to you. I think remembering that Logos is a tool puts everything into perspective. So for those who want to be a good steward (to summarize):(1). Start storing your study notes (sermon notes, biblical discoveries, word studies, favorite quotations) on hard-drives; print them out and create a reference library of your hard work.
(2). Buy physical copies of your dearest text(s).
(3). Always remember that Logos is a tool. Which by the way, if you are only using Logos for commentaries, I encourage you take the time to explore some of their tools. I've been thoroughly enjoying their word study tools. I may be biased, but I think I spend most of my time in Logos not in commentaries but in word studies. The tools in Logos are like no other software. You can get online commentaries and books from many places. I find that Logos truly shines in their tools.
To Logos: I am so thankful for your company. Your software has been such a blessing to my bible studies. I hope for more decades of success in your endeavor to help Christians dig deeper into God's eternal word. Looking forward to meeting y'all in heaven.0 -
I have used Logos since about 1991, when they bought the rights to the old Dallas Theological Seminary CDWORD program. So, that is over 30 years. I can honestly say that I have never lost a book that I bought from Logos Bible Software. I realize that there are changes in management and ownership. But I will trust them unless I find a strong reason not to do so. They have proven trustworthy.
"In all cases, the Church is to be judged by the Scripture, not the Scripture by the Church," John Wesley0 -
I could give a number of examples where FL had done some of these things.
But I will continue to invest in Logos resource. I do have a lot to loose in terms of earthly things when it comes to my Logos Library but as a Christian I lift my eyes up to my God where i put my faith in full confidence of the outcome.
0 -
I recently lost an entire box of hardcover books to termites. While it's true that there are legitimate concerns about the longevity of electronic resources, there are also a lot of ways you can lose physical books. That does give some perspective.
0