In Ancient Literature, add additional section - Nag Hammadi and Islamica

MJ. Smith · 2025-02-04T09:17:01+00:00

There was an error rendering this rich post.

Ancient literature has a section for Judaica but not a similar section for "Islamica" … I would like to see it also include other minor Abrahamic religions but just adding Islam is probably an easier sell. And if we have a Dead Sea Scrolls Sectarian Material section, surely we can get an equivalent Nag Hammadi section.

Find more posts tagged with

Features

Status: Submitted

Comments

DMB

DSS > Nag Hammadi logically makes sense. But then (I'm mentally still based early 1900s), the Cairo Geniza and earlier. Maybe document groupings like that do make sense. Of course, Logos would need the documents, I suppose!

Quick Links

Product Feedback

Recent Ideas

Missing Author Datatype / Wiki Article
I really want to have Dantes "Divina Comedia" in the Italian original in Logos/Verbum, but no one voted for it. So I tried to make a PB, but as other users affirm, there are no Milestones for "Dante" or the "Divina Comedia" present. Today, I wanted to check on the Author Datatype list coming from the Logos Wiki: Which…
Bible Study Builder notebook
can we please get the notebook function so that our notes for the questions could be stored in a notebook.
Notes: More Robust Indenting
When typing in Word, or even in the Notes Feature on the Logos Desktop App, when you start an indented number list, and you go to the next line then tab out, it goes from 1. to an a. indented from the position of the 1. (I hope this makes sense). I would love it if there was a way to add this to the Mobile/iPadOS version…
Addition to iOS app
In the iOS app there is a “back button” that will take you to the previous passage that you were at. It would be nice to also have a “forward” button so that you could go back to where you were before you hit the back button.
Missing/dead links interim improvement
On a frequent basis there is a forum thread on the issue of links resulting in a debate on links to different editions of the work. I suggest the following to minimize this reoccurring debate. Exclude milestone references and bibliographic references. If the user owns the edition referred to in the link, links as usual. If…