Why did Joseph and Mary stay in Bethlehem for 2+ years after Jesus was born?
Curious...feel free to speculate....
Why did Joseph and Mary stay in Bethlehem for 2+ years after Jesus was born?
Comments
-
They could have felt like it would be a good place to start over without the small-town gossip of Nazareth about Mary being pregnant with another man's child (as the town gossips would have supposed).
Perhaps also they might have thought that Micah 5:2's prophecy about the Messiah being born in Bethlehem meant that he was supposed to live there.
0 -
Family commitments. Joseph and/or Mary are of Judean stock, perhaps the offspring of settlers with Hasmonean/Sadducean political sympathies. I remember reading references to research in a book by archeologist Jonathan Reed that indicated Galilee was a largely a depopulated territory at the time Hasmoneans like Alexander Janneaus started expanding into the area as part of a vision of a greater Israel as a contribution to God's great plan for a re-established Davidic empire. To do that they needed settlers who would see the hardships they might endure establishing northern settler communities as part of a divine plan for a reinvigorated greater Israel.
Joseph and Mary have a clear identity as proud Galileans, but they also have a heritage that involves stong and active kinsip obligations centred around the region of Bethlehem and the Judean hill country. They'll take their time to resestablish those links before heading north again to their Galilean home.
We were asked to specultate. Feel free to shoot me down. Logos has some good stuff from Sean Freyne about Galilean identity in the first century. It could do with more material from writers like Reed and other specialist on Galilee in the first century.
0 -
Sam Henderson said:
Feel free to shoot me down.
It's not my intent to shoot you down.... But ...I don't see that God had a great plan for a re-established Davidic empire. But rather a greater empire ... The Kingdom of God. Consider the fact that God cursed/condemned the Davidic lineage so that no further (earthly) kings could come from that line. (Jehoiakim and Jeconiah )Sam Henderson said:as part of a vision of a greater Israel as a contribution to God's great plan for a re-established Davidic empire.
0 -
Perhaps they stayed in Bethlehem a little over 41 days.
In Luke 2:21-38 details how Joseph & Mary fulfilled the requirements of the law. Then in Luke 2:39 it says after fulfilling the requirements of the law that they returned to Nazareth.
In Matt 2:1-8 we hear of the Magi and Herod. In Matt 2:9 the Magi went on their way probably headed toward Bethlehem. But in the same verse it says that the star appeared and lead them to the house where Jesus was. It doesn't say that was in Bethlehem. So it is possible that the house was in Nazareth.
Edit: Or that the Magi's visit was within the time that Joseph, Mary & Jesus were still in Bethlehem. And Herod used 2 year old children to be sure he was thorough.
0 -
JoshInRI said:
Why did Joseph and Mary stay in Bethlehem for 2+ years after Jesus was born?
How do you know they stayed there 2+ years?
Yes, I know that after the Magi snuck out, Herod had all the boys 2 years and younger killed, but he may have just wanted to be overly thorough (he was quite paranoid). The two year old mark may have simply been an edict to kill all nursing children, since children (at least in Old Testament times) may have nursed until they were about three years old.
Yes, the star appeared some time before they arrived, but we don't know how long before.
I'm not saying they didn't stay there that long, it's just that we can't know that they did.
I just reread the nativity stories in Matthew and Luke and see no reference to a length of time that Mary and Joseph stayed in Bethlehem. In fact Luke's account suggests they only stayed there not much more than 40 days (Luke 2:39, cf. Lev.12:1-8), though in his account they return to Galilee directly, not by way of Egypt.
(If I missed some other detail, please let me know.)
Help links: WIKI; Logos 6 FAQ. (Phil. 2:14, NIV)
0 -
Admittedly I am not a sophisticated user of Logos/Verbum. That said, I am curious about the technique a person would use to research this question. I've been working on this for a couple of hours haphazardly and don't have any satisfying results. Here is what I have done:
1. Opened my favorite bible translation plus some others
2. Found the relevant passages that have been mentioned here
3. Scrolled down through the Passage Guide to try and locate any relevant information, focusing on timelines or timing
4. Same with Passage Analysis, Factbook, and Timeline
5. Opened the commentaries/monographs I have to try and locate some specific analysis
Others have already noted several points regarding timing of circumcision and presentation .. some number of days. Herod and the massacre of the infants 2 yrs and younger seems to have some bearing.
Am I overlooking a research technique?
0 -
Steve said:
Am I overlooking a research technique?
I don't think so. That's basically what I did. I also did two other things: 1) I consulted the Faithlife Study Bible, but mostly to confirm what I already had concluded by reading the text. 2) I ran a Bible search on the phrase "two years," in case I had missed something.
A basic careful reading of the text, is the main thing though: What does it say? What doesn't it say?
Help links: WIKI; Logos 6 FAQ. (Phil. 2:14, NIV)
0 -
I'm with Rich on this. It's as likely that the 2 year old reference for Herod has to do with his question as to when the star appeared (Matthew 2:7). And assuming "the family" was staying with people they knew and in their home, the visit of the magi at the house where they were could easily have been very close to the shepherd's visit - a matter of a few days (likely after his presentation in the temple).
0 -
Thank you Rich and others. The question was mentioned in a Bible Study and I was curious for an answer and how Logos could be used to help answer it. You were all helpful and a blessing.
Peace,
Joshua
0 -
steve clark said:
In Matt 2:1-8 we hear of the Magi and Herod. In Matt 2:9 the Magi went on their way probably headed toward Bethlehem. But in the same verse it says that the star appeared and lead them to the house where Jesus was. It doesn't say that was in Bethlehem. So it is possible that the house was in Nazareth.
This seems unlikely. Go a little farther down and you will see they fled to Egypt because Herod was searching for Jesus in Bethlehem. If he were already in Nazareth, that would seem very odd.
Using Logos as a pastor, seminary professor, and Tyndale author
0 -
Ok here is how I interpret what the Bible says,
The wise men HAD LESS THAN FORTY DAYS (I'm Not yelling here) from Jesus’ birth to visit Him at Bethlehem, or He would have been gone from there.
Luke 2:21-22 says, “And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb. And when the days of her purification according to the law of moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord.”
The length of the days of purification is listed in Leviticus 12:1-8. Which basically adds up to 41 days. 8 days to circumcision and then another 33 days after.
So the wise men had LESS THAN FORTY DAYS to visit Jesus in Bethlehem, or He would have been gone to Jerusalem. After that, He would have been back in Nazareth for a short time, and then in Egypt for a period of time.
Luke 2:25-39 says, “And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him. And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ. And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law, Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said, Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word: For mine eyes have seen thy salvation, Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people; A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel. And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against; (Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity; And she was a widow of about fourscore and four years, which departed not from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day. And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem. And when they had performed all things according to the law of the lord, they returned into galilee, to their own city nazareth.”
Matthew 2:13-16 says, “And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into egypt, and be thou there until i bring thee word: for herod will seek the young child to destroy him. When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt: And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son. Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men.” After the above things took place, then they fled to Egypt for a time.
So the wise men brought their gifts to Jesus when He was less than forty days old, while He was still at Bethlehem.
EDIT: I also forgot this
Matthew 2:1-16 says, “Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews?
The passage says the wise men asked, “Where is he that is born King of the Jews?” They were looking for the King that was newly born. They were not looking for a two year old boy.
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Bryan, you might want to edit your 3rd quote source.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Unless we start quoting Logos resources that speak to this issue, we should go to christiandiscourse.com where the company has kindly set up space for theological discussion in general.
0 -
Lee said:
Unless we start quoting Logos resources that speak to this issue, we should go to christiandiscourse.com where the company has kindly set up space for theological discussion in general.
So the Bible is not a Logos resource? What? (shaking my head now)
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Lee said:
Bryan, I don't fault you for not knowing about this.
The Forums exist to support users, and to promote the company. Forum guidelines are here. General theological discussion fits better elsewhere.
Why are you Slamming me for this!!! I did not start this thread! and further more lee why where were you not saying this to the other 13 posters before me... Are you trying to pick a fight with me? I simply answered the mans question, your comments should be directed at everyone and not me!!!
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Bryan ... 'Luke 2:13-16 says, “And when they were departed, ...' I think you meant Matthew?
Regarding Lee, we have a gambling den installed in the forum next door, with the betting on how many replies to a Logos thread will occur, before the Logos police are called. On this one, quite a few of the betters lost big-time (most bets were 6). Yes, joking.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Denise said:
Bryan ... 'Luke 2:13-16 says, “And when they were departed, ...' I think you meant Matthew?
Regarding Lee, we have a gambling den installed in the forum next door, with the betting on how many replies to a Logos thread will occur, before the Logos police are called. On this one, quite a few of the betters lost big-time (most bets were 6). Yes, joking.
Yes that should Be Matthew, Thanks I'll change it.
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Denise said:
Regarding Lee, we have a gambling den installed in the forum next door, with the betting on how many replies to a Logos thread will occur, before the Logos police are called. On this one, quite a few of the betters lost big-time (most bets were 6). Yes, joking
Technically this is a discussion not directly related to how to use Logos, it's a discussion about something in the Bible itself (for which we can use Logos to research, I admit). It should go to the ChristianDiscourse discussion forum.
But short, non-controversial topics are often tolerated on these forums, especially if they illustrate how to use the software. This discussion does not seem controversial.
Help links: WIKI; Logos 6 FAQ. (Phil. 2:14, NIV)
0 -
Bryan S. said:
Why are you Slamming me for this!!! I did not start this thread! and further more lee why where were you not saying this to the other 13 posters before me... Are you trying to pick a fight with me? I simply answered the mans question, your comments should be directed at everyone and not me!!!
Oh, don't worry about all these self-appointed Logos police - most of them just don't have anything better to do. And they are usually the first ones to participate when the OT subject interest them.
Longtime Logos user (more than $30,000 in purchases) - now a second class user because I won't pay them more every month or year.
0 -
Bryan, I found your post helpful. Thank you.
0 -
Alex Scott said:
Oh, don't worry about all these self-appointed Logos police - most of them just don't have anything better to do. And they are usually the first ones to participate when the OT subject interest them.
Love the Lucy Pic, My 5 cents is on the way...[:D]
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Sam Henderson said:
Joseph and Mary have a clear identity as proud Galileans, but they also have a heritage that involves stong and active kinsip obligations centred around the region of Bethlehem and the Judean hill country. They'll take their time to resestablish those links before heading north again to their Galilean home.
We were asked to specultate. Feel free to shoot me down.
Why would I want to "shoot down" someone that is correct? I think that Joseph grew up in Bethlehem. Also note that Joseph wanted to return to Bethlehem after the stay in Egypt. Also note that the wise men visited a "child". So I also think that they were in Bethlehem for about 2 years staying with Joseph's friends and close family. Scripture only give us the details needed for our salvation.
0 -
David Ames said:
So I also think that they were in Bethlehem for about 2 years staying with Joseph's friends and close family
No couldn't be because of Luke 2:25-39 which clearly stated that after they left the temple in Jerusalem they went back to Nazareth. which is clearly stated in Verse 39.
So they stayed up to 40 days in Bethlehem then traved to Jerusalem because the days of purification were over. Dedicated Jesus in the temple then went back home to Nazareth.
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Bryan S. said:David Ames said:
So I also think that they were in Bethlehem for about 2 years staying with Joseph's friends and close family
No couldn't be because of Luke 2:25-39 which clearly stated that after they left the temple in Jerusalem they went back to Nazareth. which is clearly stated in Verse 39.
So they stayed up to 40 days in Bethlehem then traved to Jerusalem because the days of purification were over. Dedicated Jesus in the temple then went back home to Nazareth.
Some Logos tools so we can keep playing in this sandbox: Using the reverse interlinear on Luke 2:39, I see the temporal term ("when" in the ESV) is the common hos. A word study on this shows that the word usually means like or as, but when used temporally implies that one event has come before another (or that they are contemporaneous), but it need not be immediately before. See: John 7:10, Acts 16:15, 19:21 for three instances where there was apparently a reasonable gap. Acts 16:10 includes the word
immediately," so that is not apparently implied.The LN number is 67.45: 67.45 ἐπειδήb; ὡςd: a point of time which is prior to another point of time, with the possible implication in some contexts of reason or cause—‘when.’
ἐπειδήb: ἐπειδὴ ἐπλήρωσεν πάντα τὰ ῥήματα αὐτοῦ … εἰσῆλθεν ‘and when he had finished saying all these things … he went’ Lk 7:1.
ὡςd: ὡς δὲ ἐγεύσατο ὁ ἀρχιτρίκλινος τὸ ὕδωρ οἶνον γεγενημένον … φωνεῖ ‘and when the man in charge of the feast tasted the water which had turned into wine … he called’ Jn 2:9; τὰ δὲ λοιπὰ ὡς ἂν ἔλθω διατάξομαι ‘as for the other matters, I will settle them when I come’ 1 Cor 11:34.
Johannes P. Louw and Eugene Albert Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (New York: United Bible Societies, 1996), 634.So, according to Luke, after they left the temple they went back to [edit: Nazareth], but this could be Luke telescoping details, since there is no need to understand this as "immediately went back to Jerusalem."
[<b>edited by:</b> Justin Gatlin at 3:50 PM (GMT -8) on Fri, Dec 26 2014]
Denise noted that the Temple is in Jerusalem. Oops.Using Logos as a pastor, seminary professor, and Tyndale author
0 -
Just thought you might like to see this. It's a video about a guy who used Astronomy to predict when the Magi arrived. It's pretty interesting. Not sure if it's correct, but it is food for thought. Takes about an hour to watch but worth the time. I showed it at my church a few years ago on a Wed night at Christmas time.
Dr. Kevin Purcell, Director of Missions
Brushy Mountain Baptist Association0 -
Uh, oh. Justin's got the Temple semantically located outside of Jerusalem. Absent a quick edit, that is.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Kevin A. Purcell said:
Just thought you might like to see this. It's a video about a guy who used Astronomy to predict when the Magi arrived. It's pretty interesting. Not sure if it's correct, but it is food for thought. Takes about an hour to watch but worth the time. I showed it at my church a few years ago on a Wed night at Christmas time.
Active link:
0 -
Bryan S. said:Lee said:
Bryan, I don't fault you for not knowing about this.
The Forums exist to support users, and to promote the company. Forum guidelines are here. General theological discussion fits better elsewhere.
Why are you Slamming me for this!!! I did not start this thread! and further more lee why where were you not saying this to the other 13 posters before me... Are you trying to pick a fight with me? I simply answered the mans question, your comments should be directed at everyone and not me!!!
No, Bryan, I wasn't slamming anyone, much less you. You wondered why talking about the contents of the bible (aren't they Logos resources?) would be frowned on, so I tried to explain the fuller context of what I meant.
As to "picking a fight etc. etc," really I don't deserve this. The sort of aggressive language you display, fueled in part by the conviction that others are interfering with the proper explanation of the holy writ, is precisely why FaithLife does not welcome theological debates per se on the company Forums.
Justin Gatlin said:Some Logos tools so we can keep playing in this sandbox:
Your analysis, using Logos tools, is quite relevant!
0 -
Lee said:
As to "picking a fight etc. etc," really I don't deserve this. The sort of aggressive language you display, fueled in part by the conviction that others are interfering with the proper explanation of the holy writ, is precisely why FaithLife does not welcome theological debates per se on the company Forums.
Lee let me be quite frank,
This post was started on Dec 23 2014 6:20 AM why were you not complaining about it to the original poster then? or even the next day as you were posting things on this forum those days. all of the post up until your post were quite chordal I read them all. And I can't tell but I don't think anyone posting on this thread had any issues with the question at hand.
I quoted the bible numerous times in my post which you say is a logos resource. So it seemed there was no issue with you and this thread until I posted a response...So if you were not trying to pick a fight tell me why it took you so long to condemn this thread?????
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Let me also be quite frank, brother.
1. I'm not doing any condemnation. Stop the language cheap-shots.
2. This thread could go many ways, despite the invitation to "speculate". Even OT threads can go on track. I was suggesting that folks make it more relevant to the Forum's objective. If this offends you because that suggestion happens to come after your post, you're taking it personally when you shouldn't. I've explained myself with great care already, and if you insist this is a personal attack on you, even stooping to using aggressive language, then I'll let God be the judge.
0 -
Lee said:
I've explained myself and if you insist this is a personal attack on you, and even using aggressive language, then I'll let God be the judge.
Fine, If you were not attacking me I apologize, but you still have not answerd my question why so long? why not post something as soon as a thread is started and not wait 4-5 days?
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Cool off, wait a few days, come back and read it again, ask the question nicely, and I might answer.
0 -
steve clark said:
Perhaps they stayed in Bethlehem a little over 41 days.
In Luke 2:21-38 details how Joseph & Mary fulfilled the requirements of the law. Then in Luke 2:39 it says after fulfilling the requirements of the law that they returned to Nazareth.
In Matt 2:1-8 we hear of the Magi and Herod. In Matt 2:9 the Magi went on their way probably headed toward Bethlehem. But in the same verse it says that the star appeared and lead them to the house where Jesus was. It doesn't say that was in Bethlehem. So it is possible that the house was in Nazareth.
Edit: Or that the Magi's visit was within the time that Joseph, Mary & Jesus were still in Bethlehem. And Herod used 2 year old children to be sure he was thorough.
I think the Bible tells us in Luke 2:39-40,
39-40
When Joseph and Mary had done everything required by the Law of the Lord, they returned to Galilee to their own town of Nazareth. 40 And the child grew and became strong; he was filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was on him.
The shepherds, magi and trip to Egypt had to be within the 41 days, because of verse 39-40 says Messiah stayed in Nazareth after purification.
The star must have given them time to get to Bethlehem right after the birth.
0 -
Lee said:
Cool off, wait a few days, come back and read it again, ask the question nicely, and I might answer.
Lee, I have no intention of re-asking the question, the silence says it all.
Lots of love in the Lord Brother. Talk to you again later perhaps in another thread [:)]
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Silence in the face of arrogance and aggression does speak volumes. It could also mean, as someone hinted at, that I have better things to do.
0 -
Bryan S. said:David Ames said:
So I also think that they were in Bethlehem for about 2 years staying with Joseph's friends and close family
No couldn't be because of Luke 2:25-39 which clearly stated that after they left the temple in Jerusalem they went back to Nazareth. which is clearly stated in Verse 39.
So they stayed up to 40 days in Bethlehem then traved to Jerusalem because the days of purification were over. Dedicated Jesus in the temple then went back home to Nazareth.
Except that Matthew says that they fled to Egypt.
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
George Somsel said:
Except that Matthew says that they fled to Egypt.
Yes this is true, Perhaps what happened was that as they left Jerusalem to head back to Nazareth we know that an angel warned them and they went straight to Egypt.
Looking at a Logos interactive maps (sand box) Nazareth is way up north so it wouldn't make much since to travel that far north than to turn around and head straight back through Jerusalem to Egypt... Perhaps [:)]
EDIT: Posted Logos Pic
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Bryan S. said:George Somsel said:
Except that Matthew says that they fled to Egypt.
Yes this is true, Perhaps what happened was that as they left Jerusalem to head back to Nazareth we know that an angel warned them and they went straight to Egypt.
Looking at a Logos interactive maps (sand box) Nazareth is way up north so it wouldn't make much since to travel that far north than to turn around and head straight back through Jerusalem to Egypt... Perhaps
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. Perhaps anything is possible. It is best to simply read what the text states and not attempt to make acommodations for what any other text may say. The clear implication is that the kings visited them in Bethlehem and they straightway went to Egypt. Does Luke's account agree with this? Absolutely not, but they aren't writing history. The religious implications of each story is to be understood by itself.
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
George Somsel said:
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. Perhaps anything is possible. It is best to simply read what the text states and not attempt to make acommodations for what any other text may say. The clear implication is that the kings visited them in Bethlehem and they straightway went to Egypt. Does Luke's account agree with this? Absolutely not, but they aren't writing history. The religious implications of each story is to be understood by itself.
Yes, I agree which I said the same as you in a earlier post, did you see it? except below
George Somsel said:The clear implication is that the kings visited them in Bethlehem and they straightway went to Egypt.
No, They went to Jerusalem first.
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Bryan S. said:George Somsel said:
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. Perhaps anything is possible. It is best to simply read what the text states and not attempt to make acommodations for what any other text may say. The clear implication is that the kings visited them in Bethlehem and they straightway went to Egypt. Does Luke's account agree with this? Absolutely not, but they aren't writing history. The religious implications of each story is to be understood by itself.
Yes, I agree which I said the same as you in a earlier post, did you see it? except below
George Somsel said:The clear implication is that the kings visited them in Bethlehem and they straightway went to Egypt.
No, They went to Jerusalem first.
Not according to Matthew. You are conflating Matthew and Luke and attempting to reconcile them. It can't be done.
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
George Somsel said:
You are conflating Matthew and Luke and attempting to reconcile them.
Not likely to reconcile George and Bryan either.
--All in fun [;)]
Help links: WIKI; Logos 6 FAQ. (Phil. 2:14, NIV)
0 -
George Somsel said:
Not according to Matthew. You are conflating Matthew and Luke and attempting to reconcile them
They must be reconciled
Just because Matthew didn't say it doesn't mean it didn't happen, fact is it had to happen according to scripture remember Jesus kept all the law, I say again all the Law of which being dedicated in the temple was part of the Law and if that didn't happen he is not Savior for all the law was not kept.
I preach the harmony of the Gospels, not the separate or disunity of them, one complements the other, all God breathed by the Holy Ghost...
Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it's been found difficult and not tried.
0 -
Totally OT, but I've been stuck on Herod's tomb (BAR Jun 83) where the professor thought he found the tomb, slipped and fell and died, and now his students say not so. Poor guy!
Anyhow, Bethlehem's right on the road to Herodium (back then). I'd bet Herod was quite familiar with Bethlehem, since likely he passed through several times during the Matthew/Luke account. We could ask him.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Riddle: How many Logosians does it take to move a topic to the correct forum?
Answers: The same indeterminate number of Logosians it takes to continue a topic in an inappropriate forums.
Statements re: reconciliation/non-reconciliation are clearly theological and since we have already had some sharp words in this thread, I'm getting very uncomfortable. And thanks Rich for trying to stamp out hot spots. (Yes, Rich has special knowledge of fire fighting).
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
George Somsel said: Except that Matthew says that they fled to Egypt.
Question: In first century middle east would you want to travel with a new baby [40 days old or so] or with a 2 year old?
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
Riddle: How many Logosians does it take to move a topic to the correct forum?
When moved please drop a link here so we can find it and continue. [Hopefully with out the need of fire fighting] Thanks
0 -
George, aren't we supposed to use scripture to interpret scripture?
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPHKg0M3mEo
