Official: You Can Now Get Early Access to the Next Version of Logos
Comments
-
Jonas Weisse said:Graham Criddle said:
I don't quite understand this - could you expand a bit please?
AI within a chatbot produces at the moment, trying to put together "sensible" statements according to what it was programmed with. The tagging of Logos resources was maybe done with some algorithms but often by hand. Whenever you search Logos now, it doesn't produce something new; it reacts precisely to your input (search operators, etc.) and lets you access your books in an incredible way. But if you let AI produce some text, this text will be different every single time (hence its incomparability to the tagging and dataset approach so far). Searching Logos now relies on the intelligence of highly skilled people who created the datasets (e.g. in the original language resources) and tagged titles (which can be accessed via the Factbook). You can apply your theological knowledge to the vast intertwining of all your resources.
However, for AI to perform a proper run, we would only need "reader editions," not "logos editions," to get results. The quality is not the same; it is far worse because AI does not correct itself and you can never repeat the same outcome. Also, AI sometimes makes the most stupid mistakes while at the same time being able to solve highly complex problems. It is not reliable. However, the tagging and datasets are quite reliable.
Jonas - YES! Thank you for your well-stated and accurate remarks ... I was about to post to make this point, as well as reinforce your posts at 3:31 & 3:39 today.
There is a HUGE VALUE in the tagging, since it (I presume) it was done by believers, at least most of the time in fellowship with the indwelling HS, and with a solid understanding of the Bible. That is, Spirit-Directed Human Intelligence. Hurray for SDHI !!
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Lew Worthington said:
I know the other subscription tiers haven't been announced/determined, but I hope there is one aimed at people with academic interests. I would have little use for many of the new Pro features, but I might be interested in an AI tool optimized to do textual criticism or Greco Roman or Akkadian intertextuality and stuff like that.
There will be a tier focused more on academic use. I confess that Akkadian intertextuality isn't yet at the top of our list of possible features for that tier, though...
How will the subscription model work with the Academic Program and Academic Pricing? More than just tiers targeted at academic interests, which could include non-students/non-faculty, will there be pricing for academic users in the future?
0 -
Jim Dean said:
East TN:
My apologies for unintentionally "targeting" you. I was "ranting" about the topic in general, and just clicked the nearest Reply. My points were being made to inform folks and to hopefully shut down further comparisons.
No need to apologize! Your comments were on point. I just wanted to make sure that I hadn't inadvertently left the impression that I was opposing a one-time purchase option.
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Jon said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
Major improvements will certainly be delivered to subscribers only.
With the certainty that all new major improvements/features will be accessible to "subscribers only," it seems their decision has unfortunately been made.
My apologies. I expressed myself poorly there. What I was trying to say was that if we released a new feature, any improvements to that feature would be delivered to subscribers but would not be delivered to people who had bought the feature outright. I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
Mark
There seems to be confusion on the point as to whether the company may still consider new features for non subscribers.
Please clarify this for us.
0 -
Bede said:
Will the engine update be at the same time for everyone or, as now for those not upgrading, about 6 months later for those not subscribing?
It will be at the same time for everyone. Many improvements will be restricted to those who upgrade though.
Bede said:The current feature sets are slightly different for Verbum compared with Logos. Is this going to continue? If so, will there be dynamic pricing (as now) for someone subscribing to both feature sets?
It's very likely there will be some differences between the two feature sets. We haven't yet discussed whether there will be a combined option.
Bede said:The subscription for Logos Pro includes, presumably classed as features, several books that are currently available to purchase as books (e.g., Lexham Geographic Commentaries). Will these still be available separately?
Yes, they'll be available separately. We don't intend to withdraw books from individual sale just because they're also in a subscription.
Bede said:When the new model rolls out, will there be discounts applied for those who have already purchased most of the features included in 'Logos 11'?
Yes, discounts will continue.
The discounted price we're currently offering is not an early bird discount. It's a discount based on L10 ownership. There will continue to be a significant discount for L10 owners even after launch.
0 -
Jim Dean said:
And guess what ... the more that the AI tools infect the Logos experience, the LESS VALUE tagging and datasets will have. The AI doesn't understand the incredibly poweful syntax and keywords that are inherent in Logos searching. And it would be hugely, impractically expensive for Logos to reprogram ChatGPT to recognize those capabilities.
If I'm wrong in my logic, please explain why, and explain how subscriptions will change any of it.
Mark explained how smart search works earlier. First, they take your search and make it broader (looking for synonyms) and use traditional tagging to find the top 50 results. Then AI orders those results and figures out which portions to highlight as a match with your search. Beyond that, there is no reason that the tagging should not be visible to an AI. It can easily be trained to convert a search for Abraham to look for "Abram," "Abraham," and person:Abraham.
Using Logos as a pastor, seminary professor, and Tyndale author
0 -
Good question about Academic program/pricing with the subscription model. If the subscription model is what Logos is going to go with (still trying to process all that is written here), they can pay back all the thousands of dollars I paid and go their way.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:Jim Dean said:
However, at least in current forms, and likely in all future forms, SINCE the tagging is hidden, not part of the exposed readable text, the AI engine is oblivious to it. The AI searches don't need nor can they use it. The AI is trained on the world-wide-web ... why should it need tagging? (sarcasm intended ... like in Back to the Future ... where we're going, we don't NEED "roads").
You are making several assumptions here that we have no evidence of. We do not know what the access of the AI component to the tagging is, The AI component of search is not trained on the world-wide-web. Logos is not using one of the glitzy chat bots for its prioritization of results. I suspect that much of the tagging was done initially by AI or a NLP predecessor. Should Logos expand its AI in the search into the core search engine itself, I would expect it to still continue to be tied to tagging - physical or on the fly.
Jim Dean said:And it would be hugely, impractically expensive for Logos to reprogram ChatGPT to recognize those capabilities.
It is a matter of retraining rather than reprogramming. Should Logos ever choose to partner with ChatGPT or a similar product, I would expect significant retraining to match the corpus that it is intended to "know."
Jim Dean said:that as the AI grows, Logos will do significantly less tagging, on significantly fewer books ... since that's probably a big portion of their historical business expenses.
I assume the reverse. As AI becomes more adept at accurate tagging (I'm assuming somewhere 92-96% now) and there is less human cleanup of the data after the initial computerized process, I would expect more tagging and more complex tagging than we currently have.
MJ: I have participated in the R&D plus testing of another ChatGPT-driven Bible Study tool, so I do have some experience with the process, in addition to having been an active programmer since 1967. I've also been very extensively involved with R&D plus use of serious genetic algorithm (GA) and neural-net (NN) tools for high-end stock trading algorithms. So, none of this is new turf for me.
I can't speak to what's going on behind the curtain at Logos re AI, but I'm 95% sure that the things I spoke of are correct and will remain so for the foreseeable future. FYI, they have NOT trained ChatGPT on their huge library ... partly due to the expense, and partly since even those couple hundred thousand books would just be a drop in the bucket statistically, vs the zillions of MB of web-scraped content that makes ChatGPT & other robust AI engines function. Furthermore, I *am* certain that the tagging is hidden from the current Logos AI implementation, based on simple tests I've already done. And, even if it wasn't, those tags if made visible to ChatGPT are just "noise" ... meaningless gobbledegook that would not statistically correlate with other items in ChatGPT's huge dictionary of genes and neurons, nor would they contribute to the rules that it generates.
Also, I'm drawing some information from an email that Mark Barnes sent to me on March 11th ... it wasn't labelled as confidential, so I'll paste it here in its entirety (bold & underlines are mine):
Hi Jim,
Very few companies have the financial ability for an entirely homegrown AI engine, so we’re building on technology provided by several partners. We use a variety of large language models and other AI tools and choose each one based on its suitability for specific tasks. We monitor the effectiveness of these models and have the ability to quickly switch to better-performing or more reliable models if we discover frequent bias or other adverse issues.
No AI tool presently in existence could *only* be trained using Logos’ library. We have more than 200,000 books, but training an AI from scratch would likely need tens or hundreds of millions of books.
In a document I’m writing, I say that AI has human qualities, not divine ones: AI, and especially the large language models that power tools such as ChatGPT, are typically trained on billions of documents written by human beings. That’s how it’s able to mimic human responses. But that also means AI mirrors and sometimes amplifies the weaknesses found in all human authors. Like us, AI has limitations, fallibilities, and biases. Human beings are both fallen and made in the image of God. AI is neither of those things, but it reflects both of them because it is trained on us. Just as human-authored books can both help and hinder our study of God’s word, so too can AI.
We mitigate against those risks by using AI to illuminate the highest-quality biblical texts, datasets, and books. We don’t just use AI standalone, we use it with our own content. That content, and careful direction from us, guides the AI to product output that is very likely to be useful for biblical studies. It’s still imperfect, and needs to be used with discernment, but it’s generally higher quality and more accurate than you might expect.
–
Mark Barnes
Product Manager, Bible Study Tools
Logos
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
Steve Shelton said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Jon said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
Major improvements will certainly be delivered to subscribers only.
With the certainty that all new major improvements/features will be accessible to "subscribers only," it seems their decision has unfortunately been made.
My apologies. I expressed myself poorly there. What I was trying to say was that if we released a new feature, any improvements to that feature would be delivered to subscribers but would not be delivered to people who had bought the feature outright. I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
Mark
There seems to be confusion on the point as to whether the company may still consider new features for non subscribers.
Please clarify this for us.
I apologize for adding to that confusion. It's hard to keep up with this thread, and I didn't proofread my response carefully enough before I hit Post.
Yes, Logos is still considering new features for non-subscribers. That is not ruled out. That has been the situation since my first post where I asked for feedback on whether that would be important to you.
It's not surprising to hear many of you say that the ability to buy a feature set is important. We knew it would be important to some of you. What we wanted to understand was how important it was and how many of you felt that way.
This thread has been great for us in that regard. We hear, loud and clear, that – alongside our plans for subscription – many of you would value the option to purchase a feature set, even if it didn't come with regular updates or AI features. We're continuing to listen, and continue to value this feedback.
0 -
Mark Allison said:EastTN said:
It's far easier for me to make an investment now for something that I can continue to use in the future than it is for me to commit to an ongoing subscription fee that I may not be able to maintain through my retirement.
I'm not sure I'm understanding you. You'll still be able to upgrade to the latest version of Logos after retirement (for free), without paying a subscription fee.
Then let me try to express the core concern here in a different way. If Logos moves to this new model in October, what will my options be in December? Will I be able to purchase a new feature in December and carry it over into retirement? I would like for the answer to be "yes." The most recent post from Mark Barnes suggests that may be the case.
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Jon said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Major improvements will certainly be delivered to subscribers only.
With the certainty that all new major improvements/features will be accessible to "subscribers only," it seems their decision has unfortunately been made.
My apologies. I expressed myself poorly there. What I was trying to say was that if we released a new feature, any improvements to that feature would be delivered to subscribers but would not be delivered to people who had bought the feature outright. I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
If the answer is "no," then I would most likely forgo the new feature, because I'm not interested in picking up ongoing monthly fees as I approach retirement.
I believe most of the angst in this thread is because earlier posts from FaithLife staff seemed to imply that the answer would be "no." But I'm entirely comfortable with the arrangement Mark describes here:
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:...What I was trying to say was that if we released a new feature, any improvements to that feature would be delivered to subscribers but would not be delivered to people who had bought the feature outright. I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
I don't expect to get new features for free.
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
This is starting to sound much more hopeful. Now if only the language could be clarified and solidified, all the drama would die down quite quickly.
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) wrote the following post at Today 2:29 PM:
Steve Shelton said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Jon said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Major improvements will certainly be delivered to subscribers only.
With the certainty that all new major improvements/features will be accessible to "subscribers only," it seems their decision has unfortunately been made.
My apologies. I expressed myself poorly there. What I was trying to say was that if we released a new feature, any improvements to that feature would be delivered to subscribers but would not be delivered to people who had bought the feature outright. I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
Mark
There seems to be confusion on the point as to whether the company may still consider new features for non subscribers.
Please clarify this for us.
I apologize for adding to that confusion. It's hard to keep up with this thread, and I didn't proofread my response carefully enough before I hit Post.
Yes, Logos is still considering new features for non-subscribers. That is not ruled out. That has been the situation since my first post where I asked for feedback on whether that would be important to you.
It's not surprising to hear many of you say that the ability to buy a feature set is important. We knew it would be important to some of you. What we wanted to understand was how important it was and how many of you felt that way.
This thread has been great for us in that regard. We hear, loud and clear, that – alongside our plans for subscription – many of you would value the option to purchase a feature set, even if it didn't come with regular updates or AI features. We're continuing to listen, and continue to value this feedback.
QuoteMark, Thanks for the quick reply on this0 -
Justin Gatlin said:Jim Dean said:
And guess what ... the more that the AI tools infect the Logos experience, the LESS VALUE tagging and datasets will have. The AI doesn't understand the incredibly poweful syntax and keywords that are inherent in Logos searching. And it would be hugely, impractically expensive for Logos to reprogram ChatGPT to recognize those capabilities.
If I'm wrong in my logic, please explain why, and explain how subscriptions will change any of it.
Mark explained how smart search works earlier. First, they take your search and make it broader (looking for synonyms) and use traditional tagging to find the top 50 results. Then AI orders those results and figures out which portions to highlight as a match with your search. Beyond that, there is no reason that the tagging should not be visible to an AI. It can easily be trained to convert a search for Abraham to look for "Abram," "Abraham," and person:Abraham.
Hi, Justin
I did pay the 9.99 to try out the the AI, after watching how it works from the examples that Josh Rowe helpfully posted in MP Seminars.
I tested the Search using carefully worded queries, to determine how well implemented it had been (thus far). It worked fine with simple queries ... I got many legit hits to the question "How old was Noah when the Flood came?". And I got many legit hits to the question: "How do young-earth creationists discuss the Flood?". HOWEVER, when I worded the question with an implicit "filter" ... this is a BASIC capability of a robust AI ... the Logos AI implementation utterly failed. If you're currently subscribing, try out these two AI queries:
"How old was Noah when the Flood came, according to young-earth creationists?"
"According to young-earth creationists, how old was Noah when the Flood came?"
If your library is at all similar to mine, you'll get a zillion hits to each question. However, NONE of the hits will take BOTH PARTS of the question into account.
Most of what I got, from both questions, was about YEC's ... since there is so much written about that POV, in my library.
A robust AI would have handled that two-part Q without dropping a beat ... I have posed far more complex questions to another Bible-lesson-prep ChatGPT4-driven app, and it's handled them just fine ... albeit with sometimes goofy or contradictory answers ... it's clear that it read and worked with the entire question.
I *did* like the summaries for the various articles ... but it was awkward to skim them since I had to click on each, and I got dozens or hundreds of hits to most questions. It would have been far better if the summaries were already gen'd in a second column ... but Logos doesn't (and, I'm sure won't) do that since every summary costs cloud CPU cycles.
The illustrations for the Sermon engine were a total disappointment. In my 14k+ titles, I have plenty of "sermon illustration" books. Logos COULD have designed that part of the AI to at least attempt to draw illustrations FROM those books. Instead, it made up simplistic stories much like you might tell a young child at bedtime.
So, after testing that and other things, I cancelled the subscription. Logos was nice and refunded my $9.99, btw.
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
My apologies. I expressed myself poorly there. What I was trying to say was that if we released a new feature, any improvements to that feature would be delivered to subscribers but would not be delivered to people who had bought the feature outright. I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
....
I apologize for adding to that confusion. It's hard to keep up with this thread, and I didn't proofread my response carefully enough before I hit Post.
Yes, Logos is still considering new features for non-subscribers. That is not ruled out. That has been the situation since my first post where I asked for feedback on whether that would be important to you.
It's not surprising to hear many of you say that the ability to buy a feature set is important. We knew it would be important to some of you. What we wanted to understand was how important it was and how many of you felt that way.
This thread has been great for us in that regard. We hear, loud and clear, that – alongside our plans for subscription – many of you would value the option to purchase a feature set, even if it didn't come with regular updates or AI features. We're continuing to listen, and continue to value this feedback.
Mark -
THANK YOU for qualifying the earlier exclusionary statement, which truly has, as another poster put it, "caused many of us a lot of angst". Understatement, that.
However, your phrasing still makes it clear that you ARE SURE you are going to start offering subscriptions of varying types, but the wording above "is still considering" means you ARE NOT YET SURE whether you will offer periodic "baskets" of accumulated non-AI features (along with necessary datasets) to be purchased on a "perpetual license" basis, as has been true for all prior history.
Please, if ... WHEN (I hope) ... y'all DO become SURE about offering those accumulated-feature+dataset packages every year or two, PLEASE let us know here in this thread, and please MODIFY your original post so that newcomers to the thread won't have to wade through everything to find it.
And I do join with others most sincerely in thanking God for leading you to open this up to feedback ... and thanking you for following that leading.
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
We’re still thinking through what that means for purchasable feature sets, and we’d value your feedback on whether the option to purchase would be important to you, knowing that you’d miss out on all the AI and cloud-backed features along with regular updates.
I'd like to add my voice to any encouragement to continue to bundle feature set upgrades as one-time purchases. I'm not very interested in the features that cost you additional compute on the server side (LLM integrations, etc.) and don't mind paying for the cost of new feature development but don't want to lose those features once I've paid for them.
It seems you already have ways to do "feature upgrades" with each new version of Logos, and I would hope for a bi/tri annual cycle of bundling new software features for those of us who do usually buy feature upgrades and/or new base packages with each cycle.
0 -
Jim Dean said:
If you're currently subscribing, try out these two AI queries:
"How old was Jonah when the Flood came, according to young-earth creationists?"
"According to young-earth creationists, how old was Jonah when the Flood came?"
If your library is at all similar to mine, you'll get a zillion hits to each question. However, NONE of the hits will take BOTH PARTS of the question into account.
Your tests were more appropriate for a chat-bot than for an ai prioritization of a search. And I would question whether or not Jonah was alive at the time of the flood. So my comparison of capabilities is:
I would not expect the search, AI assisted or not, to be able to correctly identify young earthers accurately.
Gemini did a decent job of not answering the question:
Gemini said:According to young-earth creationists (YECs), the concept of Noah's Flood and the story of Jonah typically aren't directly linked in terms of chronology. Here's why:
-
Separate Events: YECs believe the Flood was a singular, catastrophic global event that happened thousands of years ago. The book of Jonah tells a story of a prophet likely living much later.
-
Timescale: YECs estimate the Earth and all lifeforms to be around 6,000-10,000 years old. This timeframe is separate from the timeframe they propose for the Flood.
-
Focus on Jonah's Story: For YECs, the book of Jonah centers on his message of repentance and God's mercy, not necessarily his age during a specific point in history.
Therefore, young-earth creationists wouldn't necessarily assign a specific age to Jonah in relation to the Flood. They would focus on understanding the message of his book within its own context.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
-
Hi MJ
WOOPS ... my foolish mistake while typing fast. The queries I used definitely referenced NOAH, not Jonah. You're quite correct that Jonah was not alive at the time of the Flood!
As to the form of my question ... the Logos AI is BUILT ON various "chat" engines (see Mark Barnes' letter to me, that I posted). The queries that I raised which used the term "young-earth creationists" resulted in dozens or hundreds of hits ... I didn't count. There were a LOT. And they were for the most part, valid hits.
Try it yourself. But with Noah, not Jonah.
Your examples were reasonable for structural syntactical searching, which is what Logos currently offers, in its own format. AI engines do NOT require formalized syntax ... accurate grammar and spelling helps, but even that is not crucial.
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
I'm familiar with your search for Noah, I started the other thread about it. I think MJ did a good job of explaining that what you're looking for is not what Logos is trying to do. They're making a smart search, not a chatbot. Since no resource in your library is going to distinguish between the age of Noah from a YEC perspective versus other viewpoints, there isn't anything for it to surface.
In my book, that is a feature, not a bug. I don't want Logos generating an answer by combining different resources, where I have to guess where it came from. That is how other AIs make stuff up. I don't want answers that aren't explicitly in my library. But your mileage may vary.
If you run a search where the qualifier is relevant, you will get better results. Example: who is the Antichrist according to preterists?
Using Logos as a pastor, seminary professor, and Tyndale author
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
We’re still thinking through what that means for purchasable feature sets, and we’d value your feedback on whether the option to purchase would be important to you, knowing that you’d miss out on all the AI and cloud-backed features along with regular updates.
If you are asking for feedback, please know that I am unlikely to rent or subscribe to feature sets as one of your customers. I have no problem with you offering a subscription model for your customer base. I am sure some customers are pleased with that option. I have no qualms there. However, I am personally unlikely to go down this road. Therefore, eliminating the purchase option will likely have the effect of me spending less money on the software and books. I write this to simply appeal to you. Please keep the purchase option alive in tandem with the subscription option as you have done for so many years.
0 -
Justin Gatlin said:
I'm familiar with your search for Noah, I started the other thread about it. I think MJ did a good job of explaining that what you're looking for is not what Logos is trying to do. They're making a smart search, not a chatbot. Since no resource in your library is going to distinguish between the age of Noah from a YEC perspective versus other viewpoints, there isn't anything for it to surface.
In my book, that is a feature, not a bug. I don't want Logos generating an answer by combining different resources, where I have to guess where it came from. That is how other AIs make stuff up. I don't want answers that aren't explicitly in my library. But your mileage may vary.
If you run a search where the qualifier is relevant, you will get better results. Example: who is the Antichrist according to preterists?
Thanks for that early thread, Justin. Yours plus Josh's comments convinced me to spend the money and try it out.
I hear you re the value of using qualifiers that are keywords in Logos datasets ... I doubt that the Logos AI implementation actually USES those datasets at present, however (I explained why, earlier). It would be a very complicated and expensive undertaking.
The FACT is that Logos DID recognize "young-earth creationists" ... it found a lot of info about those teachings, and the debates with old-earth creationists, and evolutionists (I have a lot of titles in my library about this topic ... it's a favorite of mine, me being a science geek.)
So, until and unless Logos staff explicitly state that the keyword lists, tagging and dataset info is fully accessible to the AI Search engine, as someone who's done a lot of coding and testing of this kind of stuff before, I'd advise everyone to assume that info is NOT utilized, at least at present. I would be *happy* ... overjoyed, in fact ... if someone in charge of the Logos AI coding were to correct me on this.
In fact, IF those keywords, tags and datasets ARE fully intertwined with the Logos AI Search tools, I'd have a much higher opinion of their value.
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
Hi Jim
Jim Dean said:Justin Gatlin said:If you run a search where the qualifier is relevant, you will get better results. Example: who is the Antichrist according to preterists?
Thanks for that early thread, Justin. Yours plus Josh's comments convinced me to spend the money and try it out.
I hear you re the value of using qualifiers that are keywords in Logos datasets ... I doubt that the Logos AI implementation actually USES those datasets at present, however (I explained why, earlier). It would be a very complicated and expensive undertaking.
I didn’t take Justin’s comment to suggest that the smart search is making use of keywords in Logos datasets - more that he was suggesting a different simple-text qualifier.
Am I missing something?
0 -
Jim Dean said:
In fact, IF those keywords, tags and datasets ARE fully intertwined with the Logos AI Search tools, I'd have a much higher opinion of their value.
I'm still waiting for the AI to understand that "Nicea" and "Nicaea" are the same place.
0 -
Graham Criddle said:
Hi Jim
Jim Dean said:Justin Gatlin said:If you run a search where the qualifier is relevant, you will get better results. Example: who is the Antichrist according to preterists?
Thanks for that early thread, Justin. Yours plus Josh's comments convinced me to spend the money and try it out.
I hear you re the value of using qualifiers that are keywords in Logos datasets ... I doubt that the Logos AI implementation actually USES those datasets at present, however (I explained why, earlier). It would be a very complicated and expensive undertaking.
I didn’t take Justin’s comment to suggest that the smart search is making use of keywords in Logos datasets - more that he was suggesting a different simple-text qualifier.
Am I missing something?
Good point. I assumed that since "preterist" is almost certainly one of the keywords and/or tags, so I may have incorrectly assumed he was using it for that reason. My response was intended to point out that:
1. it DID recognize a less-likely-to-be-tagged term "young-earth-creationists" (in fact its a phrase ... more difficult)
2. there was nothing wrong with the syntax of my query ... AI queries are DESIGNED to be natural language ... they've been trained on the world of the web, after all. If however I had tried to use the exact syntax that a Logos query might require, I suspect it would have confused the AI search. Especially if I got into fancier queries that referenced datasets or morphology, etc.
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
Jim Dean said:
the Logos AI is BUILT ON various "chat" engines
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Smart Search doesn't use ChatGPT or Gemini.
In Smart Search, we perform a very loose search without AI. That finds 50 articles that roughly match your query. We then use AI to identify a snippet from each article that most closely matches your query. We don't rewrite any text; we only identify the most relevant existing text in the book. Once we have these snippets, we use AI to re-order them to put the most relevant ones at the top.
I think we have different readings of "built on" ...
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Jim Dean said:
1. it DID recognize a less-likely-to-be-tagged term "young-earth-creationists" (in fact its a phrase ... more difficult)
There is a huge difference between recognizing the phrase, recognizing a tag for that phrase, and recognizing the people to whom the phrase applies implicitly or explicitly. You need to show me that the Logos search identified people who are considered young earth creationists in resources not tagged with topics and where the person is not referred to as a young earth creationist for me to buy into your argument.
Jim Dean said:AI queries are DESIGNED to be natural language
True for the chat bot, less true (but still true) of the Logos AI-enhanced search, not true at all for some uses of AI
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
MJ. Smith said:Jim Dean said:
the Logos AI is BUILT ON various "chat" engines
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Smart Search doesn't use ChatGPT or Gemini.
In Smart Search, we perform a very loose search without AI. That finds 50 articles that roughly match your query. We then use AI to identify a snippet from each article that most closely matches your query. We don't rewrite any text; we only identify the most relevant existing text in the book. Once we have these snippets, we use AI to re-order them to put the most relevant ones at the top.
I think we have different readings of "built on" ...
Hi MJ:
I didn't recall seeing that quote you provided from Mark Barnes. I'm using Mark's term, from the email he sent me, when he said:
"we’re building on technology provided by several partners. We use a variety of large language models and other AI tools and choose each one based on its suitability for specific tasks."
I've been using the term ChatGPT as a simplistic way to talk about AI interface. Actually, ChatGPT is just a front end. Logos obviously is utilizing a deeper level API. He didn't tell me who those partners were.
I also missed the two-part search interpretation "hint" that you quoted. If that's how it's working, it's going to be hard to learn how to use. If the Logos AI first-pass REQUIRES some rough syntax rules, then presumably it rejects some other syntax. That's less powerful than other interfaces I've seen before.
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
The disadvantage of the AL feature is that the verses are not hovorable. It would be very handy if this were implemented.
Blessings in Christ.
0 -
Jim Dean said:
Let’s imagine that Logos staff finally decide to clean up all the awkwardnesses and documented limitations of the notes+highlighting feature(s).
Let’s imagine that a lot of users have previously created hundred of thousands of notes that use various features of the existing Notes+Highlighting. Finally, let’s imagine that your cleanup of Notes+Highlighting is so extensive that you need to replace a major portion of the existing code, and that the 2.0 version can do the same things as before, plus a lot more things, as well as fixing bugs.
You’ve said major new features will only be by subscription. I presume a wholesale rewrite to a 2.0 version (my example) would be in that subscription-only category.The Logos NOTES feature, as well as the highlighters, are really bad. Even though I created my own highlighters, it's still bad because I'm limited by the tool as it was built and it has a lot of inconsistencies, almost a kind of "bug".
I still dream that Logos will implement the markdown language and a note system inspired by the Obsidian software. Only then will I start using the Logos grading system. Today I only use it to mark and save errors I find in books. Nothing more.____________
"... And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." (Ne 8.10)
0 -
Jim Dean said:
the Logos AI is BUILT ON various "chat" engines (see Mark Barnes' letter to me, that I posted)
He didn't say that. You quoted him as writing:
Mark Barnes via Jim Dean said:so we’re building on technology provided by several partners. We use a variety of large language models and other AI tools and choose each one based on its suitability for specific tasks.
This quote is accurate.
FWIW, Smart Search is currently built with word embedding vector and vector-space techniques, not by using a RLHF LLM. This may change in the future as technologies advance and different approaches deliver better results.
Jim Dean said:I've been using the term ChatGPT as a simplistic way to talk about AI interface.
This feels unhelpfully simplistic to me (if you want to talk about technical details).
0 -
Bradley Grainger (Logos) said:Jim Dean said:
the Logos AI is BUILT ON various "chat" engines (see Mark Barnes' letter to me, that I posted)
He didn't say that. You quoted him as writing:
Mark Barnes via Jim Dean said:so we’re building on technology provided by several partners. We use a variety of large language models and other AI tools and choose each one based on its suitability for specific tasks.
This quote is accurate.
FWIW, Smart Search is currently built with word embedding vector and vector-space techniques, not by using a RLHF LLM. This may change in the future as technologies advance and different approaches deliver better results.
Jim Dean said:I've been using the term ChatGPT as a simplistic way to talk about AI interface.
This feels unhelpfully simplistic to me (if you want to talk about technical details).
Hey Bradley ... I'm surprised you contradicted my use of Mark's term. Here, again, is the full letter. Note the bold underline that I added, re "built on".
I'm going to try to stop responding to quibbles about just how Logos AI (or any other AI) works ... although I've had the opportunity to do a lot of related development coding, I don't know Logos' code.
I've been trying to share insights but it appears to be creating arguments that don't really impact the opinion I am sharing, which I am of course entitled to.
So, sayonara, folks!
Hi Jim,
Very few companies have the financial ability for an entirely homegrown AI engine, so we’re building on technology provided by several partners. We use a variety of large language models and other AI tools and choose each one based on its suitability for specific tasks. We monitor the effectiveness of these models and have the ability to quickly switch to better-performing or more reliable models if we discover frequent bias or other adverse issues.
No AI tool presently in existence could *only* be trained using Logos’ library. We have more than 200,000 books, but training an AI from scratch would likely need tens or hundreds of millions of books.
In a document I’m writing, I say that AI has human qualities, not divine ones: AI, and especially the large language models that power tools such as ChatGPT, are typically trained on billions of documents written by human beings. That’s how it’s able to mimic human responses. But that also means AI mirrors and sometimes amplifies the weaknesses found in all human authors. Like us, AI has limitations, fallibilities, and biases. Human beings are both fallen and made in the image of God. AI is neither of those things, but it reflects both of them because it is trained on us. Just as human-authored books can both help and hinder our study of God’s word, so too can AI.
We mitigate against those risks by using AI to illuminate the highest-quality biblical texts, datasets, and books. We don’t just use AI standalone, we use it with our own content. That content, and careful direction from us, guides the AI to product output that is very likely to be useful for biblical studies. It’s still imperfect, and needs to be used with discernment, but it’s generally higher quality and more accurate than you might expect.
–
Mark Barnes
Product Manager, Bible Study Tools
Logos
=============
Redeeming the time (Eph.5:16+Col.4:5) ... Win 10, iOS & iPadOS 16
Jim Dean0 -
Jim Dean said:
I've been using the term ChatGPT as a simplistic way to talk about AI interface.
Okay - we weren't talking about the same thing at all. GPT to me means Generative Pre-trained Transformer which has nothing to do with the AI techniques used by Logos. I would refer to this as an extreme example of synecdoche where I missed that it was a figure of speech.
Jim Dean said:it's going to be hard to learn how to use.
I find that simply listing the key terms of my search without any operators works well most of the time - no fixed syntax as shown in my Jonah example. [;)] In beta testing, I don't recall people have problems using it.
But I think I finally understand what you were saying as well as thinking you understand what I was saying. Thanks for sticking with it until we cut through the miscommunications.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Disappointment and disgust does not cover how I feel. If faithlife prohibits me from buying feature sets in the future, and sells new features exclusively in a subscription based model, then I will be done with Logos. I will then sell my library and they will never get another cent out of me.
0 -
Jim Dean said:
Hey Bradley ... I'm surprised you contradicted my use of Mark's term. Here, again, is the full letter. Note the bold underline that I added, re "built on".
I contradicted "chat engines", not "built on".
There are plenty of techniques in the broad "AI" space that have nothing to do with chat-based RLHF LLMs. In particular, Smart Search (which we seemed to be predominantly discussing) is not built on "chat engines".
Jim Dean said:I've been trying to share insights but it appears to be creating arguments that don't really impact the opinion I am sharing, which I am of course entitled to.
Sorry, I understood you to be wanting to discuss low-level details about the search, not just sharing feedback. I apologise for overstepping and chiming in with irrelevant technical details.
We do genuinely value user feedback about these new features. In particular, it has been very enlightening to see how you approach the Smart Search ("tell me about X according to authors who believe Y") and how that's not currently a good fit for the current implementation. I hope you return to this conversation with more valuable insights like that.
0 -
Rafe Andersen said:
Disappointment and disgust does not cover how I feel. If faithlife prohibits me from buying feature sets in the future, and sells new features exclusively in a subscription based model, then I will be done with Logos. I will then sell my library and they will never get another cent out of me.
I hear Blue Letter Bible is pretty good.
0 -
For myself, I have no interest in a subscription model of Logos. The uncertainty regarding the future of feature set availability outside of the subscription model is concerning.
I suggest keeping the current model as it now is for those like myself who do not prefer subscription. By that I mean resource, feature set, dataset, etc., are maintained on a regular basis as they are currently. Then add the four tier subscription plans which will include all the AI related features for those who wish to use Logos as a subscription option.
Business wise it is most beneficial to leave and maintain the current format as it has been implemented; while, then adding subscription as an option for those who want to go that route. Less confusion, less heartache, etc., and both sets of customers, even future customers, are better served in this way.
0 -
Anon said:
For myself, I have no interest in a subscription model of Logos. The uncertainty regarding the future of feature set availability outside of the subscription model is concerning.
I suggest keeping the current model as it now is for those like myself who do not prefer subscription. By that I mean resource, feature set, dataset, etc., are maintained on a regular basis as they are currently. Then add the four tier subscription plans which will include all the AI related features for those who wish to use Logos as a subscription option.
Business wise it is most beneficial to leave and maintain the current format as it has been implemented; while, then adding subscription as an option for those who want to go that route. Less confusion, less heartache, etc., and both sets of customers, even future customers, are better served in this way.
Well said! This is what I hope they'll end up doing as well.
I also have no interest in a subscription. It doesn't make sense to me. But perhaps it might to some. Let those who want to buy it, buy it. Let those who want to pay for a subscription pay for a subscription. There doesn't need to be just one way to do it.
0 -
Don, these are good thoughts--thanks for sharing. I'd like to add a few of my own, since Mark said he wants to hear them.
I'm generally not a fan of the subscription model, but I understand the reasoning behind this decision. For me, the decision to subscribe is based on value. With that in mind, I'd like to use Microsoft as my example. For many years, I only bought the perpetual license version of Office. When MS introduced the subscription model, I resisted, because I didn't want to "rent" my software and was happy with the features I had.
Over time, MS introduced new features that I wanted, so I would upgrade my copy, and that would keep me for a few years. At some point, MS added much more value by introducing web and mobile versions that were included, as well as tons of cloud storage and a super generous amount of accounts for the family plan. Suddenly it became a no-brainer to subscribe!
Even with the subscription model, however, they still sell retail perpetual license versions, and I think it would be wise for Logos to do the same. Yes, all the new features would only be available to subscribers, but those who buy a perpetual license might have a feature set that is a year or two behind at the time of its release. Due to the reasons you cited, I would not think it wise to allow ala cart purchases of feature sets, just sell bronze, silver, gold and platinum levels like they do today, but a step or two behind the subscription. When the features are old enough, they're probably already paid for anyway.
The moral in all of this is that people should buy a subscription because it offers a compelling value, not because they were forced to do it. If some are happy continuing to buy upgrades, that's still a revenue stream for Logos, it still keeps users "in the fold", and they can still buy into the subscription model if it ever interests them enough.
I'm looking forward to learning more about the new model.
0 -
Aaron Hamilton said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
This is starting to sound much more hopeful. Now if only the language could be clarified and solidified, all the drama would die down quite quickly.
Yes. This highlighted by Logos would be a great help if they can confirm it more clearly.
0 -
Thanks for the post, Mark. I was advised to post the contents of an email I sent to cs@logos.com yesterday in this thread to voice them in the forum.
Email read as follows:Dear Sir or Madam,I am writing to express my concern about Faithlife’s motion toward a subscription-based model for the next upgrade to Logos Bible Software. I stepped out in faith with L5/L6, choosing to invest in Logos over other competing programs because it was the best one out there and it did not require a subscription model for upgrades. I keep reading that Faithlife has not yet decided to go all-in on a subscription model for upgrades (to be clear, I am not confused regarding updates vs. upgrades), and I hope they do not. For the new user who has no investment, the subscription model makes sense from a business perspective. But when it comes to customers who have been loyal for years (and as stewards of the funds we have been given by God, invested thousands of dollars), this potential new upgrade requirement does not honor them. If this new model becomes the only option for upgrading, I can’t help but think that older, loyal users should be grandfathered in some way.Thank you for your time and consideration, and may God guide your team in the process.
In Christ,Keith Allan Moore
NRP, FP-C, EMT-T
Firefighter-Paramedic/Chaplain (Ret.)
Quantico Fire & Emergency Services
“We know love by this, that He laid down His life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.” 1 John 3:160 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Jon said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
Major improvements will certainly be delivered to subscribers only.
With the certainty that all new major improvements/features will be accessible to "subscribers only," it seems their decision has unfortunately been made.
My apologies. I expressed myself poorly there. What I was trying to say was that if we released a new feature, any improvements to that feature would be delivered to subscribers but would not be delivered to people who had bought the feature outright. I wasn't ruling out the possibility that in two years' time there might be a means to purchase those improvements outright.
Thanks for the clarification Mark, that is helpful.
0 -
Thank you for the transparency regarding the move to a primarily subscription-based model with respect to feature upgrades. Since you have solicited feedback, I would just say that I would greatly value being able to purchase individual features over a subscription. I understand that features pertaining to AI might require a subscription, but I strongly suggest that Logos provide an option for feature sets that can continue to be bought outright (perhaps excluding the AI features). There are many features in Logos that I find incredibly value to own, but I may only use them a few times a year. I couldn’t justify a monthly expense for those features unless I was using them regularly. I expect that future feature additions might be similar, and I’d love to just be able to buy the features that I actually want and will use.
It’s possible that I may try out Logos Pro just to see how the AI features are, but I doubt I would keep a subscription just for AI features, and I would certainly not subscribe for other features. Based on review of many other comments and concerns, I think I am not alone in saying that I want the choice to buy non-AI features outright.
A secondary concern pertains to the long-term maintenance of features from previous Logos versions. I’m sure Logos has a plan in place to make sure that any previous features purchased will continue to be maintained and troubleshooted, but it would be better if Logos would make that explicitly clear for the comfort of users.
Thank you for all you do to make Bible study easier and more accessible, and may God provide wisdom as the Logos team navigates the path forward!
0 -
I’ve read most of the thread here, which is mainly speculative.
As a german user who became more invested (also financially) in Logos recently, I’d like to ask a few questions future plans concerning concrete resources whatever the future holds regarding subscription models. Will already existing / sold / bought resources curated? E.g.:
Lexikon der Kirchengeschichte (Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche – kompakt)
- Will it be linked to the Timeline?
- Will it be linked to the Timeline?
- The introduction is full of typos. I flagged some of them. Will there be a thorough review?
Das Evangelium des Markus (Wuppertaler Studienbibel)
- The introduction is full of typos. Will there be a thorough review?
Thanks in advance for answering these questions.
0 -
One way to look at this is that for years users have asked to be able to perform more loosely worded google type of searches. I remember a thread years ago when Bob Pritchett talked about this and discussed some of the technical challenges of bringing that into the desktop experience.
I think for some, Smart Search is a huge step in that direction and SHOULD BE CELEBRATED!
Whether I would ever use 'AI' much in other things, even this very first implementation of enhanced search on its own has some has some significant benefits for digging around in a large library. The good news you can still stick with traditional searches if that is all that you want. Going forward, I will be using both and I can already see how it will save me time and highlight resources that I might not find as quickly. The exciting thing is, this is just the dawn of a new type of searching and it will only get better.
The point to make on this is that AI is here to stay, but it is a very, very broad topic (it is not just a chatbot) and will enhance a number of features. I also agree AI can be abused. We already use a lot of tech that assists us in ways that we have come to just accept as life. For example, my kids will use Apple Maps to drive to a store, but will never look at a map to check whether it is the best route or not. I have challenged them to think. Blind use of technology will be a danger for all of us and we need to be wise and discerning at all times. If a person doesn't want to use the elements connected to sermon prep, then don't do it. That is critical thinking that is required in this day and age, regardless of whether you use specific implementations of 'AI' or not. And to be fair, if Logos was not doing this, there would be some on these forums rightfully raising alarms that the platform is falling behind in how computer assisted Bible study could be advanced.
I applaud Logos for pushing the boundary into new things and exploring ways to invest in the platform. The apps could use huge investment in existing features (i.e. notes) and the Bible software market in general has lost a lot of its innovative edge. In recent years we have lost Bible Works and WordSearch. In the premium Bible software that mostly leaves Olive Tree and Accordance. Accordance has had its own issues in the last couple of years and have not indicated even the slightest capacity to innovate on this kind of stuff as they try to deliver on a multi-year promise to have a web app and advanced syncing. To Logosians, these are age old technologies that we have come to accept on this platform as status quo.
Even this type of dialogue with users, can also be assumed as status quo. I have seen threads like this locked on another Bible software forum when management did not really want to listen to their most active users. I think Logos has been very wise to engage in a prelaunch phase with its user base as it charts new territory. It's not an easy task - we have users that have spent 10's of thousands on the platform over the years, and then those that are joining now that might take years to catch up in building a library that advanced features need. I would have done the same thing by having this consultation and rolling out a prelaunch preview. I think this positions Logos for success for whatever they ultimately launch this autumn.
There has been a number of comments made by management on the ongoing free base software, continuation of perpetual licenses, possible opportunities to buy older feature sets out right and perhaps even graceful exit paths for loyal users that subscribe for many years. I personally trust and believe they will find the right combination of things to drive innovation and sustainability. No company is infallible and I have made my critiques to Bob on more than one occasion, but this thread indicates that they are endeavouring to do the right thing, and are listening. Again, management engagement like this is not seen everywhere.
I for one am very happy to pay for a subscription to invest and receive early access to enhancements and new innovations. Waiting for two years for significant improvements is an eternity in this age of software, and if we can work through the change management of this to give Logos the investment money it needs to drive the product forward, whilst protecting our long term investments in perpetual licenses and residual value, we just might have the best of the past, while we adapt into the future.
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
This thread has been great for us in that regard. We hear, loud and clear, that – alongside our plans for subscription – many of you would value the option to purchase a feature set, even if it didn't come with regular updates or AI features. We're continuing to listen, and continue to value this feedback.
Is it really going to be as firm as 'buy once, no upgrade'?
I'm thinking of the case where my wish for some more anglicised reverse interlinears is granted. Since these get classified as features, it sounds like you're saying that I might be able to purchase them in a feature pack, but that you wouldn't give any later updates to correct typos, etc. Surely, this sort of update should be reflected in the one-off purchase price as it is for books?
0 -
I have been a Logos user for well over a decade. Most of my experience has been pleasant; however, there has been plenty of disappointment. I have continue to remain faithful to Logos because it has provided me with a powerful resource when it comes to my preparation and growth. I've used other programs over the years of ministry that have not come close to the power of Logos.
Like many that have already voiced their concerns about the subscription model, I don't like them, never have, never will. I signed up for the Faithlife Now subscription because my sales contact at Logos sold me on all of the benefits of having it. The paint dried and the new wore off and Logos moved on to something else. A while later when other Faithlife projects were falling apart, they came back to those of us who were Now members and told us that they were going to slap some new paint on the Faithlife Now subscription add some bells and whistles and call it Faithlife Connect. Many of us didn't like the new model then because it lacked value for many who had spent so much in building our libraries. There target was layman and churches. Great idea... but the only appeal for many of us was the added features being rolled out and not having to wait for major updates. In my mind it was in some way a paid beta program. I remained through the transition of Faithlife Now to Connect. The value for me over the past couple of years hasn't been great and I've considered cancelling my subscription. Logos hasn't added any value to convince me that it was worth the money that I spend. The free book every month... They really don't appeal to me and I sift through the pages looking for books that maybe one day will end up providing something in a search query for research. I doubt it but it's my hope.
Now... We are hearing of new paint and things changing again... I get it... AI is the new hype and every business under the sun is getting in on it. Can it be helpful in providing more power to the already powerful Logos experience. I think it will. I'm sure many of us have already been dabbling in the AI fields and have seen some good and some bad things coming from this new fruit. I have my own opinion as I'm sure many of you do. We are creating too many "Easy Buttons" and it's taking more and more people away from growing deeper in the Word of God. Don't get me wrong... I like the ease of being able to open Logos and using the rich features that have been developed to save us time. I value my digital library because of the time it saves me each week in study and preparation. But... It has not taken me away from my meditation and chewing on the Word of God...
The AI model that is being plated for us in the new rendition of a Subscription model from Faithlife doesn't sound appealing to me. Just like the other models that have come before, it doesn't really add that much value for me, and with the reduced features in the proposal it seems like a past meal that many of us have eaten already.
I am disappointed with Faithlife on several levels and the this disappointment has grown more and more over the past couple of years.My inside sales guy of about 8-9 years who kept me up to date on new things coming out and helped me flesh out my library moved to another department before L10 came out. I was passed on to someone else. When L10 launched I tried emailing and calling the person that I was passed on to about upgrading to the new version. That person eventually called about 6 to 8 weeks later and stated that they had been busy helping other people. I understood it was a busy time but I also felt like my years of patronage had been thrown out the window. I'm sure many of you have spent a lot of money over the years with Faithlife just like I have. They have provided us with a premium resource at a premium price. They have a business model to make money... I've helped support this model for a long time but my eagerness to subscribe to another business adventure by Faithlife has waned, especially since I've been through a few cycles with them. They've spread themselves so thin with so many different programs for this and that... Websites, Online Tithing, and the list goes on and on... Good ideas that went nowhere excepted being scraped.
So what have I done... I once subbed to Proclaim and the pro media for many years... I reported bugs and asked for changes to be made in development only to fall of deaf ears. Proclaim was a great resource but because it wasn't being developed and fixed... I found another presentation software that was being developed and was much more robust than Proclaim. Have I missed using Proclaim... Yes... but I can't continue to support a business model that doesn't want to develop and give value to those who are using and subscribing to something that's not getting any attention because the company is going down a different rabbit hole. Faithlife has spread itself across too many projects for too many years instead of focusing on the core development of their core products. This is just my observation... and I could be wrong... but look at all the misses over the years... I ended my subscription to Proclaim a year ago... I didn't receive a call or email to ask why I was leaving or a survey or anything. I guess my voice didn't matter.I've also reduced the amount of books that I purchase for my library as well. I might buy a couple of hundred dollars worth of books a year where I was once buying a few thousand dollars a year on books. There are more resources that I would like to add to my library, but I have lost a lot of motivation to buy more into Faithlife because of my years of walking beside them. Do I still think Logos is the best of the best... Yes... Will I continue to use Logos... Yes... I just don't think I can walk as close to them as I once did until they do something to really pull me back in as a valued customer/ partner.
This is my two cents for those who took time to read what I've had to say. I'm sure it's not going to make much difference, but I just wanted to share some of my frustration that has been building for several years...
0 -
I don't like the sounds of this, though I am a Connect subscriber, and have been for years, I really like the idea of just fully owning the full feature set. Having access to books is one thing, but the whole point of buying with logos is because of the feature, and data sets you offer. Moving to subscription plans permanently will be an end for me. I don't care much about AI, since I have taken endless hours with MP seminars and "Learn Logos" to actually learn how to use logos and since I've sub'd to logos pro, I haven't used it much because we are only allotted a certain amount of "credits" to use the AI with and once that is used up we wont be able to even use the feature, not only that but the AI in logos is trash, rightly said..
I sub to faithlife connect essentials because I get the full feature set, the 17 LRC, and 4 free courses a year discounts on Lexham press items and the 2% cashback in credit at the end of the year. I would never want to change that for AI features I would hardly use. The books offered in the Logos pro are not useful, every one already has enough commentaries for a lifetime with the base packages, and trust me when I say I own enough base packages for a lifetime out dated magazines that report on current events such as world news in a biblical sense? ..... I'll pass on the bible study magazine, even though I am reformed and this is a product by Ligonier.
More useful things would be dictionaries such as AYBD or IVP Black or the Pocket series, which I already own all these items. The only thing I would really like are rentals of VERY expensive commentaries that cost like $1500 - but then we have March Match up every year to get these at a huge discounted rate. If accordance didn't look like Windows 95 I would have switched along time ago. Specially after the selling of logos to a secular owner. I know you guys use the "times are changing" excuse but the true reason is ownership greed. Sad.0 -
BriM said:
Is it really going to be as firm as 'buy once, no upgrade'?
We're saying that if we offer a perpetual license, it wouldn't come with regular updates, whereas a subscription would.
BriM said:I'm thinking of the case where my wish for some more anglicised reverse interlinears is granted. Since these get classified as features, it sounds like you're saying that I might be able to purchase them in a feature pack, but that you wouldn't give any later updates to correct typos, etc. Surely, this sort of update should be reflected in the one-off purchase price as it is for books?
There is a grey area between software and content, as you point out. We've committed to continuing to ship bug fixes to the software, even to non-subscribers. I don't imagine that would be different for reverse-interlinears, where we'd consider a typo to be equivalent to a bug.
We also offer many reverse-interlinears for sale individually, and I think that's very likely to continue.
0 -
I haven't got time to go through this entire thread, but have seen the main gist of where things are headed, and hopefully, understand most of what you and your team are trying to reassure us with.
I appreciate that subscription models help software companies, but they don't always help customers. May I add my voice to those who say please don't make it subscription only for new features: split the AI features off, if you need to have a subscription for them.
I have always avoided subscriptions and will continue to do so, because I think it's a better way to steward my limited resources and I prefer to own things rather than rent them.
Your team have said a lot about those who own Logos 10 full feature sets, but very little about those who have only partial feature sets.
I'm not a pastor but preach regularly in my church and also run a small independent ministry. I therefore recently purchased the Preaching Suite Essentials package to help me with my preaching and teaching.
Please tell me that the promised ability to edit sermons on mobile will still be made available to those who don't subscribe but have bought the feature on desktop.
Also, I got the preaching suite feature set without already having the Starter/Bronze/Silver feature upgrade (I have used Logos since L4, but couldn't afford to upgrade each time), but would love to be able to get the other features in L10 without having to get a subscription.
Would you please make it possible to at least be able to get the other feature upgrades that are currently offered for Logos 10, in an ongoing way? (Again, I couldn't afford a full feature upgrade in one go, but would be grateful for the opportunity to be able to step up gradually over the next few years)
0 -
James Johnson said:
Specially after the selling of logos to a secular owner.
When did this happen? Who owns it now?
0