FEEDBACK WANTED: New Resource Toolbar on Desktop
Comments
-
Lots of improvements in this tool bar. But for goodness sake, please restore the simple toggle for the interlinear. Frustration arises when one has to hunt for it, make it easily accessible by putting the toggle button back.
Thanks!
1 -
I completely agree with Dean here, PLEASE restore the simple toggle for the interlinear. It would make it so much easier and faster.
1 -
Hi Dean and Paul
Just checking if you know about the keyboard shortcuts to toggle the interlinears:
- Ctrl/Cmd-I for the inline interlinear
- Ctrl/Cmd-Shft-R for the reverse interlinear pane
0 -
Yes, I know the keyboard shortcuts, and they are great for keyboard users, but I am more of a mouse guy (lol). I find using it is much faster except looking for a button (even if you know where it is it's a minimum of 3 clicks) that was and could be much more convenient. But thanks for the comeback!
0 -
I'm sorry I haven't been as active in this thread as I intended. We've been reading all your posts, and we discuss this thread and other feedback we get on the dynamic toolbar frequently.
But, an update from me is overdue, so let me try and be as transparent as possible as to where our thinking is.
First, change is hard, especially when you've been used to the old way for years. Maybe you've built layouts that struggle to cope with the extra height of the dynamic toolbar. Maybe there are certain features on the toolbar that you use frequently that used to take one click and now take three or four. Maybe you memorized where your favorite visual filter was on the old toolbar, and now you can't even remember whether it's on View or Formatting. We get all that. And we're sorry for moving your cheese. We don't take those decisions lightly, especially on something as fundamental as this. We spent 18 months researching, designing, and building the dynamic toolbar — more, I think, than any other feature we launched last October. Much of that time was spent learning how people currently interacted with the toolbar because it mattered to us that our changes would be disruptive to some people's study, and we wanted to mitigate that as much as possible.
Second, the dynamic toolbar is here to stay. I know that will displease some of you who were happy with the old minimalistic toolbar. It certainly had some advantages, not least the amount of space it took up. But it had become hopelessly overwhelming for new users and even many experienced users. For their sake, we needed to change, and we aren't going back.
Third, the "old" toolbar will eventually disappear for all users, very likely this year. We can't maintain two entirely different systems indefinitely, and removing the old toolbar will ensure our entire focus will be on making the dynamic toolbar work for everyone.
Fourth, we've made around a dozen small improvements to the dynamic toolbar since it launched in version 37. Two are worth mentioning specifically. First, we added a keyboard shortcut to turn the interlinear on and off. That toggle was the one that had most extra clicks, and was also one which a small number of users used extremely frequently. Second, we made some improvements to inline search, so you didn't have to switch tabs to navigate.
Fifth, we're improving the accessibility of the dynamic toolbar, and those improvements should come in v40 and v41. This should make the dynamic toolbar much more usable than the old toolbar for blind and partially-sighted users.
Sixth, we're planning to add a prefer minimized Program Setting, hopefully in v41 (but it may be later). When this setting is toggled on, two things will happen. Whenever a panel is opened, the dynamic toolbar will be minimized. Whenever a panel is no longer active, the dynamic toolbar will automatically minimize. (By "minimized", I mean that you'll see the toolbar's tabs, but not the second row that contains all the buttons and menus.) You'll be able to unminimize any toolbar by clicking on a tab. It will stay in that state until manually minimized or until you select another panel. We hope this improvement will help users for whom vertical space is key.
But, you might say, even with those improvements, my Logos experience is still worse! Our experience has been that many people find the dynamic toolbar really helps them, some people find that its pros and cons roughly balance, but a small number (thankfully a decreasing one) find their experience is worse. If that's the category you're in, then I'm sorry. I wish that wasn't the case, and I wish that all change was positive for absolutely everyone.
Unfortunately, that isn't always possible, and I have to take responsibility and admit that we've made the dynamic toolbar a little bit worse for a small number of people in order to make it a lot better for a much larger number of people. I wish we didn't have to make that tradeoff. We tried very hard to minimize the trade-off so it could be a win-win. But the unfortunately reality is that it has been disruptive for some — and if you're in that small number, I'm sorry. This sort of thing will hopefully happen extremely rarely, but no software can guarantee that every change is always better for 100% of users.
I'll leave you with a chart, which might help you to better understand our position. The chart shows the behavior of a those people who used Logos throughout 2024 and are now subscribers, and have "Send Feeback" set to "All". (Thanks, it really helps!). It shows how many people in that group toggled the interlinear display on or off. I'm using this toggle as an example, because it's the one that we've had most complaints about, and therefore the one we've been most closely looking at.
You'll see that before version 37 was released in October, typically about 16% of those users toggled the interlinear on or off each month. But since version 37 was released, that's risen by nearly half, to around 24%. So, although this toggle can feel much less accessible to some of you, it's much more discoverable, which means it's being enjoyed and being useful to so many more people. That was always our goal, and that's why the dynamic toolbar is here to stay — and hopefully, to keep on improving.
4 -
Excellent explanation, Mark. Thank you!
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
@Mark Barnes (Logos) Thank you for the detailed explanation. One quick suggestion for a possible improvement that would possibly help. Microsoft Word has a Quick Access toolbar where you can add icons for quick access to to frequently used commands. Why not add the equivalent to Logos?
2 -
Prefer Minimized Setting in v 41 sounds very good to me.
That will make life in Logos much better, so far as I'm concerned.
1 -
I'm in the camp of those who prefer the new toolbar. And I really appreciate your post, Mark. Excellent.
I'm also excited about the positive changes set to come to the dynamic toolbar. The prefer minimized setting sounds like a fantastic solution to a commonly expressed complaint. I can't wait! (Though I'm not even sure if I'll use it sometimes/always/never, but so glad to hear it's coming nonetheless.)
I'm still one to push for change, because why not make good, better? It was expressed by a Logos team member in this thread that eliminating words from the toolbar and just having icons was "doable." This is another setting I would love to see, because I dread the "More" tab (in an all-icon setting, "More" could be represented by a double-down arrow like in the 2nd row) and like to push it as far away as possible as my panels multiply and shrink in size. I also like uniformity vs having some icons in the second row with words and some without. I think both rows of the dynamic toolbar could function perfectly well with icons, and I would love to have this option.
Thx for the update. Much appreciated!
Edit: I like how features on the toolbar are easier to turn on and off in v40 Beta (no more aiming for that tiny oval - YES!!). I think this also will be a very positive change and makes me miss the on/off buttons of the old toolbar a little (ok…a lot) less.
1 -
I appreciate finally having an update. It is disappointing to see some of it but I am too invested to not use the software. As one dead set against the way the new toolbar works, I will put up with my dislike if it is actually being used by more people to dig deeper into the word. I may even cheer that fact a bit, although quietly and in secret as I lament the days of the old easy toolbar. 🤣
The "prefer minimized" is going to be helpful and the sooner the better on its release. I also like Steven MacDonold's suggestion above for the quick access. That might keep those of us who are clicking much more than we like to decrease that a bit for the vast majority of our needs.
Thanks again for the update.
Justin Walker
1 -
Yes, icons that show the text of what they represent would be best of both.
0 -
Agree👍(v 38 would have been better)
0 -
This would be great. I love customizability for quick access.
0 -
Another in the list of minor improvements for the dynamic toolbar can be found in today's v40 Beta 1: For toggle menus like Interlinear and Reformat, clicking anywhere in the header will toggle the feature - you don't need to get your cursor on the exact spot of the toggle. I know it's small change, but we hope that can make it even a little bit easier to toggle features like interlinears.
2 -
For me, this is no small change. Going from a nice fat toggle button to a tiny oval buried in the corner of a dropdown menu was the #1 thing I disliked about the toolbar change. This change feels to me like a glimmer of sunshine cresting over the hill at the break of dawn. The future is bright!
1 -
Do you mean having the text of what the icon represents show in a pop-up as one hovers over the icon? I could see how that would be useful.
0 -
If you narrow the panel so there is no room for the labels, the text labels will disappear, but the hover tips will remain. Steven and others suggest there should be a setting whereby the labels will disappear even when there would be room to show them.
3 -
Yes :-)
0 -
Yes! That would work :-)
0 -
People complain about almost everything. How about we stop using the program, go back 25 years, and see the difficulty of getting a Surman together? You can find everything in books. I think Logos is fantastic.
0 -
@Steven MacDonald I think there may be a bit of confusion here (at least on my end). After checking (interesting, the details one misses when one doesn't look closely), the pop-up text already exists, so I don't see that anything would need to change except for having an icon-only setting. I think this would be a great feature!
1 -
No … people complain about what bothers them. It doesn't bother you. So, it shouldn't bother anyone, right?
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
1 -
These are discussion forums. We discuss what works and what doesn't work as well as what we like and don't like all the while trying to be respectful to one another. This is feedback for Logos and has been valuable in moving it forward. We all have different ways of working and finding something that can come close to satisfying and providing flexibility for different workflows is one of those goals.
1 -
Or go back 25 years and hang out in the Newsgroups by himself, if he doesn't want to read "complaints" LOL
Logos 10 - OpenSuse Tumbleweed, Windows 11, Android 16 & Android 14
0